3.2 Hardened test results
3.2.1 Density
Figure 5 displays the density values for concrete mixes that contain both untreated and treated Phragmites australis fibres (PAF). As expected, the reference mix without fibres (PA0) exhibited the highest density, measuring 2420 kg/m³. The thick packing of typical concrete without the impact of fibres is reflected in these data, which serve as the baseline for comparison.
Both untreated and treated mixtures show a distinct declining trend in density as the fibre content rises with the addition of PAF. Densities decreased to 2370 kg/m³ (untreated) and 2340 kg/m³ (treated) at 0.5% fibre content. They then continued to decline at 1% fibre content, reaching 2240 kg/m³ and 2235 kg/m³, respectively. The natural fibres lower specific gravity in comparison to the concrete matrix and the additional air content they add are the main causes of this density decrease.
Interestingly, the treated fibre mixes typically maintained somewhat greater densities than their untreated counterparts at higher fibre contents, despite the general trend showing a decrease in density with increasing fibre volume. For instance, at 2% PAF, the treated mix's density (2130 kg/m³) was slightly greater than the untreated mix's (2105 kg/m³). According to this, alkali treatment may strengthen the link between the fibres and the cement matrix, lowering the possibility of air entrapment or fibre clustering and preserving the mix's integrity and compaction.
This indicates that because of the fiber’s small weight and the disruption they cause to the mix, adding more PAF gradually lowers the density of the concrete. Nonetheless, alkali-treated fibres have a little edge in preserving greater densities, suggesting enhanced mix homogeneity and fibre-matrix interaction.
3.2.1 Compressive strength
The compressive strength of concrete mixtures incorporating Phragmites australis fibres (PAF) was evaluated at 7, 14, and 28 days of curing as shown in Fig. 6. Nine mixes were used in the study: one control mix, four with untreated PAF, and four with fibres treated with sodium hydroxide (NaOH). The findings showed that the mixes compressive strengths varied significantly, emphasising the impact of fibres dosage and treatment on performance.
After seven days, the unfibred control mix (PA0) achieved a compressive strength of 23 MPa. The strength of the untreated and treated mixtures decreased to 11 MPa and 13 MPa, respectively, as the fibre content rose to 2%. At 14 days, this decreasing tendency persisted, with the 2% PA fibre mixes only reaching 15 MPa and 17 MPa, whereas the control mix achieved a compressive strength of 31 MPa. While the compressive strength of the control mix increased significantly to 43 MPa after 28 days, the mixes containing 2% PAF achieved only 19 MPa (untreated) and 25 MPa (treated), respectively.
The reduction in compressive strength with increasing fibre content can be attributed to several factors. The addition of PAF mostly results in weak zones and increased porosity at the fibre-matrix contact. The concrete's capacity to effectively support compressive stresses is hampered by the more noticeable discontinuity in the cement matrix at greater volumes. Furthermore, because untreated fibres are hydrophilic, they may absorb some of the mixing water, which would decrease the amount of water available for cement hydration and have a detrimental effect on strength development.
However, the findings also show that, at all curing ages, the NaOH treatment considerably raises the compressive strength of PA fibre-reinforced concretes. The strength values of the treated fibres were consistently greater than those of the untreated fibres. For example, the compressive strength of concrete containing 1% PA fibres rose from 32 MPa (untreated) to 34 MPa (treated) after 28 days, and from 19 MPa to 25 MPa for the 2% fibre mix. The removal of surface contaminants, waxes, and hemicellulose by the alkali treatment is probably what caused this improvement. A rougher surface texture encourages greater mechanical interlocking and bonding with the cement paste. Furthermore, treated fibres could absorb less water, leaving more free water in the mixture to promote cement hydration.
All mixtures showed a noticeable increase in strength over time, which was indicative of continuous matrix densification and hydration. Despite the fact that all mixtures demonstrated increased strength over extended curing times, the percentage gain peaked early on (between 7 and 14 days) and then dropped down after 28 days. High-fibre content mixes displayed reduced gains because of poor matrix integrity, whereas the control and low-fibre mixes retained comparatively higher strength growth. These results align with the trend reported by (Machaka et al., 2022)
The findings imply that although large amounts of PAF lower compressive strength, alkali treatment can somewhat offset these drawbacks. The treated fibre blends showed respectable compressive strength values, particularly at lower doses (0.5–1%), and might be a good choice for applications that also benefit from natural fibres toughness and crack-bridging properties. Therefore, it is advised to utilise low to moderate doses of NaOH-treated PA fibres in structural concrete for best results.
3.2.2 Splitting Tensile strength
The splitting tensile strength of the concrete mixes, including the control mix, untreated PA fibre mix, and NaOH-treated fibre mix, was evaluated at 7, 14, and 28 days of curing (see Fig. 7). At all curing ages, the data showed a steady trend of fibre-reinforced mixtures outperforming the control, with the most notable improvement coming from fibres treated with NaOH.
At seven days of curing, the results showed that adding PAF up to 1% content significantly increased the material's tensile strength. The splitting tensile strength of the fibre-free (control) mix was 1.95 MPa. Tensile strength improved as fibre content rose, reaching a high of 2.21 MPa (untreated) and 2.30 MPa (treated) for the 1% fibre mixtures. After this, the strength started to somewhat decrease, but the numbers were still higher than the control. Strength decreased to 2.05 MPa (untreated) and 2.10 MPa (treated) at 2% fibre content, suggesting that extremely large fibre quantities may start to impair tensile performance because of inadequate dispersion or fibre clumping.
At 14 days, the tendency stayed mostly the same. The control mix achieved a tensile strength of 2.13 MPa. The treated 0.5% mix achieved the maximum strength at 2.62 MPa, whereas the 0.5% and 1% fibre mixes once again demonstrated improved tensile performance. However, additional increases in fibre content led to a progressive drop, much like the 7-day results. This implies that there is an ideal fibre concentration, between 0.5% and 1%, where the benefits of fibre reinforcement are maximised without sacrificing the integrity of the matrix.
At 28 days, the tensile strengths of all mixtures continued to improve due to sustained hydration and fibre-matrix bond formation. The control mix exhibited a tensile strength of 2.81 MPa. The treated 0.5% mix had the greatest overall strength value, measuring 3.14 MPa. This suggests that a minor amount of treated PAF greatly increases tensile capability. The 2% fibre mixes displayed the lowest strengths across both series, at 2.03 MPa (untreated) and 2.23 MPa (treated), whereas the untreated mixes peaked at 2.94 MPa for 0.5% fibre content. The same mechanisms previously noted fibre agglomeration, increased void content, and reduced interfacial bonding at higher dose levels which are probably responsible for this ongoing performance deterioration at higher dosage levels. This finding supports the observations made by(Ramadan, Jahami et al., 2023)
The treated fibre mixtures performed better than their untreated counterparts in every curing phase. By enhancing surface roughness and eliminating undesirable surface chemicals, the NaOH treatment seems to have been essential in strengthening the link between the fibres and the cementitious matrix. The fibres can absorb tensile loads, postpone fracture propagation, and bridge cracks more successfully thanks to this improved connection.
The splitting tensile strength test findings show that adding PAF enhances the tensile performance of concrete, especially when the fibres are used in modest quantities and are alkali-treated. It seems that a fibre concentration of 0.5–1% is ideal for maximising tensile strength. The mechanical advantages start to wane beyond this range. These results demonstrate the potential of treated PAF as environmentally friendly reinforcement that may enhance concrete's tensile qualities while also promoting waste reduction and the creation of sustainable materials.
3.2.3 Flexural strength
The flexural tensile strength test results further confirmed the positive influence of PAF on concrete performance as shown in Fig. 8. The control mix exhibited slight strength development over time, increasing from 6.29 MPa at 7 days to 7.85 MPa at 28 days. In contrast, the inclusion of PAF especially in treated form led to significant strength gains throughout the curing period.
The results showed that, up to a particular fibre percentage, adding PAF to concrete increased its flexural strength after seven days of curing. This significant difference highlights how NaOH treatment improves fibre-matrix interaction at an early age. The addition of 0.5% and 1% PAF led to an increase in flexural strength. The untreated mixes achieved 7.39 MPa and 7.89 MPa, while the treated mixes reached 7.65 MPa and 7.96 MPa, respectively. However, the flexural strength started to decrease around 1.5% and especially at 2% fibre content. For example, the treated mix decreased to 4.78 MPa while being greater than the untreated 2% mix, which fell precipitously to 3.52 MPa. According to this pattern, an excessive amount of fibre may make it more difficult to distribute stress effectively because of poor dispersion, fibre clumping, or more voids in the matrix. This is consistent with the trend observed by (Shon et al., 2019)
At 14 days, the upward trend in strength continued as hydration progressed. The flexural strength of the control mix improved slightly to 7.08 MPa. Notably, the treated 0.5% fibre mix achieved the highest flexural strength at this age, recording 10.25 MPa. The untreated mix also performed well at this fibre dosage (9.23 MPa. Notably, the 1% fibre mixes achieved commendable flexural strengths of 8.73 MPa (untreated) and 9.23 MPa (treated), though the improvements were less significant than those recorded at 0.5% fibre content. Mixes with 1.5% and 2% fibre contents again exhibited reduced strength values, further supporting the observation that fibre reinforcement beyond a certain limit becomes detrimental rather than beneficial to flexural behavior.
By 28 days, all mixes showed further improvements in flexural strength as a result of continued hydration and the development of stronger fibre-matrix bonds. The control mixes reached 7.85 MPa, demonstrating the maturity of the plain concrete matrix. The treated 0.5% fibre mix retained the highest flexural strength overall at 10.35 MPa, indicating that moderate fibre inclusion combined with NaOH treatment has a sustained positive impact on flexural performance. The 1% fibre mixes also remained relatively strong at 8.92 MPa (untreated) and 9.95 MPa (treated), while the 2% fibre mixes again recorded the lowest values 5.2 MPa and 6.23 MPa, respectively.
The findings indicate that NaOH-treated fibres performed better than untreated ones in almost every combination during all curing times. By removing non-cellulosic substances that prevent adhesion and increasing surface roughness, the alkali treatment clearly strengthened the connection between the PAF and the cement matrix. The modified fibres were therefore better able to resist flexural loads and bridge fractures. The findings also show that the ideal fibre content range for flexural performance is between 0.5% and 1%. The reinforcing fibres improve load transmission and fracture resistance within this range without sacrificing the matrix's structural integrity. However, the mechanical interlock between the fibres and matrix may become ineffective at greater doses, resulting in decreased performance.
In Fig. 9a, the concrete sample with 1% untreated PAF shows clear evidence of fibre pull-out as well as some instances of fibre rupture. The prevalence of fibre pull-out signifies a diminished interfacial connection between the untreated fibres and the cementitious matrix. This inadequate bonding leads to fibre slippage under load, diminishing the fibres efficacy in bridging fractures and absorbing tensile stress. The existence of ruptured fibres indicates some interaction with the matrix, nonetheless, the overall performance demonstrates a restricted load-transfer capability resulting from inadequate fibre-matrix adhesion.
Conversely, Fig. 9b illustrates the concrete sample reinforced with 1% treated PAF, which largely demonstrates fibre breakage with scant evidence of fibre pull-out. This behaviour indicates that the alkali treatment (e.g., NaOH) markedly enhanced the fibre-matrix adhesion by augmenting the surface roughness of the fibres and eliminating contaminants such as waxes and lignin. The enhanced bond strength allows the fibres to develop higher tensile stress, leading to fibre breakage instead of pull-out. This failure mode is desirable, as it indicates better stress transfer and effective reinforcement, contributing to improved flexural performance of the composite. These observations confirm that alkali-treated PAF contribute to enhanced mechanical interaction with the matrix, thereby improving the post-cracking behaviour and ductility of the fibre-reinforced concrete.
3.2.4 Ultra-Pulse Velocity
Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV) testing was conducted to assess the internal quality and homogeneity of concrete specimens containing untreated and treated Phragmites australis fibres (PAF) at different curing ages (7, 14, and 28 days). The UPV values serve as a non-destructive measure of concrete integrity, where higher velocities typically indicate improved density and continuity of the matrix, while reductions may be associated with internal defects or increased porosity.
At 7 days of curing, the control mix (PA0) exhibited identical UPV values of 4.48 km/s, serving as a benchmark for comparison (see Fig. 10a). As fibre content increased from 0.5–2%, a general decline in UPV was observed for both untreated and treated PAF mixes. This reduction is expected due to the disruptive effect of fibres on the concrete matrix, which can lead to increased air voids and hindered compaction. However, it is notable that the decline was consistently less pronounced in the treated fibre mixes. For instance, at 1% fibre content, the UPV increased from 4.24 km/s (untreated) to 4.38 km/s (treated), while at 2%, the treated mix reached 4.10 km/s compared to 4.02 km/s in the untreated mix. These results suggest that alkali treatment of PAF improves fibre dispersion and interfacial bonding, thereby enhancing the early-age matrix continuity and reducing internal flaws.
The trend continued at 14 days of curing, where an overall increase in UPV values was observed across all mixes, attributed to the progression of cement hydration and densification of the microstructure. The control mix (PA0) maintained a constant value of 4.50 km/s (see Fig. 10b). The most significant improvements due to fibre treatment were again observed at higher fibre contents. For example, at 1.5% fibre inclusion, the treated mix demonstrated a UPV of 4.30 km/s compared to 4.25 km/s in the untreated counterpart. These results indicate that the benefits of PAF treatment extend beyond the initial stages of hydration and contribute to continued improvements in the internal quality of the concrete.
By 28 days, UPV values reached their peak across all mixes, reflecting the maturity and densification of the concrete matrix (see Fig. 10c). The control mix registered the highest velocity of 4.65 km/s, reaffirming its compact structure free of fibre-induced defects. Among the reinforced mixes, those incorporating treated fibres consistently showed higher UPV values than their untreated equivalents, especially at elevated fibre contents. Notably, at 2% fibre content, the UPV increased from 4.10 km/s (untreated) to 4.22 km/s (treated), a clear indication of improved structural integrity due to surface modification of fibres. The results at this age strongly support the efficacy of the alkali treatment in mitigating the negative effects typically associated with high fibre content, such as poor dispersion and increased porosity. This trend is consistent with the findings reported by (Machaka et al., 2022).
The UPV results demonstrate that while the inclusion of PAF can reduce pulse velocity due to potential microstructural disruptions, proper fibre treatment significantly offsets these drawbacks. Treated fibres contribute to enhanced bonding at the fibre-matrix interface, reduce air voids, and promote a denser, more uniform internal structure. The findings also suggest that the optimal fibre content lies between 0.5% and 1%, where improvements in internal quality are most pronounced without significant compromise to workability or matrix compactness. These conclusions are consistent with previous literature (Khalid et al., 2021; Thyavihalli Girijappa et al., 2019) on natural fibre-reinforced concrete, reinforcing the importance of fibre pre-treatment in sustainable concrete development.