In this study, we deciphered the biological impact of disrupting PRG4-CD44 interaction on synovial homeostasis and discovered that PRG4 loss upregulated CD44 in synovial tissues with an associated infiltration of CCR2 + pro-inflammatory immune cells and diminution of claudin-5 expressing barrier CX3CR1 + TREM2 + anti-inflammatory SM localization in the synovium [24, 33]. In addition to CD44 upregulation, we also observed XO and HIF-1α upregulation, both of which constitute the effector signaling pathway that triggers SM pro-inflammatory activation due to PRG4 loss [24]. In our model, CD44 was permissive for the innate immune response in synovial tissues of Prg4 null mice (supplementary Fig. 3). CD44 served as an on/off switch where in the absence of PRG4, it is in the “on” position which resulted in inducing XO and HIF-1α, and the latter orchestrated SM pro-inflammatory activation [24, 27]. CD44 loss (in its null state) ameliorated synovial hyperplasia and overall synovial pathology seen in the Prg4 null state and re-populated the synovium with claudin-5 expressing CX3CR1 + TREM2 + anti-inflammatory SMs. In addition, CD44 loss reduced the CCR2 + pro-inflammatory cell infiltrates, which likely contributed to amelioration of synovitis since the infiltration of Ly6Chigh CX3CR1low CCR2high classical monocytes promotes joint inflammation [37]. The mechanistic link of CD44 loss and amelioration of chronic synovitis is possibly related to the role that CD44 plays in macrophage activation. The chronic synovial hyperplasia and associated inflammation seen in Prg4 null animals was driven by pro-inflammatory macrophage accumulation since macrophage depletion protected against development of synovitis [22, 23, 30]. In SMs isolated from Prg4 conditionally inactivated mice, CD44, XO and HIF-1α expressions were elevated which resulted in stronger pro-inflammatory activation [24]. CD44 genetic ablation in these SMs protected against pro-inflammatory activation, as PER values did not significantly increase in response to TLR4 stimulation. This protection was mediated by reduced XO suppression and hence ROS generation and reduced HIF-1α accumulation. CD44 loss also protected against systemic inflammation, as defined by numbers of circulating immune cells. Of note, CD44 ablation didn’t completely protect against synovial pathology in the setting of Prg4 inactivation. A plausible explanation for this observation is the potential role of TLR2 and TLR4 signaling in the pathogenesis of synovitis [38]. PRG4 also binds TLR2 and TLR4, and since PRG4 binds CD44 with higher affinity vis-à-vis TLR receptors [25, 28], the TLR pathway may still be activated in the mice with Prg4 inactivation and CD44 knockout state.
CD44 is a single pass non-kinase transmembrane receptor that plays an important role in inflammation and shedding or internalization of the CD44 extracellular domain, as in the case with PRG4, induces a conformational change in its intracellular domain that activates protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A), which is anti-inflammatory via inhibition of NFκB nuclear translocation [21, 39]. CD44 responds to multiple stimuli in the cell microenvironment including mechanical, immune and metabolic signals. In monocytes and macrophages, CD44 is important for trafficking of inflammatory monocytes to the site of inflammation as well as pro-inflammatory activation of tissue-resident macrophages [40]. CD44 deficient murine macrophages released less IL-1β in response to TLR2 or TLR4 agonists, indicating protection against pro-inflammatory activation [40, 41]. In macrophages, CD44 ablation may prevent pro-inflammatory activation via promoting glycolysis-to-oxidative phosphorylation shift [24, 42]. CD44 upregulation transduces its intracellular signal via XO induction and PP2A inactivation, which promotes NFκB translocation and NLRP3 inflammasome activation [43]. ROS derived from XO promote NLRP3 inflammasome activation and stabilization and increase the half-life of HIF-1α [27]. In our conditionally inactivated Prg4 and Cd44 knockout mice, SMs failed to respond to LPS, and no glycolytic shift was observed. The CD44 loss represented the “turn-off” switch that prevented ROS generation and HIF-1α stabilization. An interesting finding in our study was the increase in CD44 expression in synovial tissues from OA patients compared to normal subjects. Interestingly, the enhancement in CD44 expression was directly related to synovitis grade, where high-grade synovitis tissues exhibited higher CD44 expression compared to tissues with low or no inflammation. This finding supports that CD44 is potentially implicated in the development of chronic synovitis, and thus a driver of OA disease. Supporting this involvement is that the expression of XO and HIF-1α trended in the same direction as CD44, where in tissues with high-grade synovitis, we observed stronger XO and HIF-1α staining, while absent in normal tissues (Supplementary Fig. 4).
PRG4 turnover dynamics is altered in inflammatory joint conditions, due to a combination of reduced expression and enhanced proteolytic degradation. PRG4 expression from synovial fibroblasts is reduced by IL-1β and increased by TGF-β, and is proteolytically degraded by elastases and cathepsins [44–46]. Protein level investigations have shown a reduction in PRG4 levels [47] and elevated friction measured in vitro by catabolic synovial fluid [48]. Not much is known about how PRG4 content in the synovial tissues is altered as OA progresses. Some reports conclude that PRG4 levels are high in osteoarthritic joints [49] but have not excluded that the PRG4 is partially digested or fragmented. Synovial tissue PRG4 content is arguably more biologically influential in the progression of synovitis compared to synovial fluid PRG4 content since the former is more bioavailable to interact with SMs and other innate immune cells exert its immunomodulatory role. In our study, we identified that PRG4 synovial content had an inverse relationship with synovitis grade. The reduction in PRG4 synovial content is potentially due to a reduction in its synovial expression by the inflammatory milieu in the synovium, as restoring PRG4 signaling in the synovium, via XO inhibition, was anti-inflammatory [24]. To test whether restoring PRG4 signaling in human OA synovium is anti-inflammatory, we isolated CD14 + cells from OA synovial tissues and stimulated these cells with a TLR4 agonist to simulate acute synovitis. Using febuxostat as a prototypical XO inhibitor, we were able to demonstrate that inhibiting the effector signaling pathway due to PRG4 loss is anti-inflammatory. The efficacy of febuxostat was more pronounced in CD14 + cells isolated from high-grade synovitis, and this correlated with the stronger XO staining observed in these specimens. These findings support a potential new role for febuxostat as an anti-inflammatory treatment for chronic synovitis in OA. This new role extends the therapeutic utility of febuxostat, which also reduces synovitis in patients with gouty arthritis [50].
In summary, we have generated a CD44 null and Prg4 conditional knockout mouse to delineate the contribution of PRG4-CD44 interaction to synovial homeostasis and identified that CD44 loss protected against synovitis in Prg4 conditionally inactivated mice. Furthermore, CD44 loss suppressed XO-HIF-1α signaling in SMs and restored the homeostatic equilibrium between anti-inflammatory TREM2 + CX3CR1 + SMs and pro-inflammatory CCR2 + SMs. In OA synovial tissues, a reduction in PRG4 content was associated with CD44 upregulation and induction of XO-HIF1α. CD14 + immune cells from high-grade synovitis tissues were activated by LPS and an XO inhibitor prevented this activation, indicating a potential role for XO inhibition in treatment of synovitis in OA.
Limitations:
We examined the role of Prg4-CD44 in model mice focusing on the synovium using one end point at 6 weeks following Prg4 inactivation. We didn’t assess long-term impact of disrupting PRG4-CD44 interaction on synovial reactivity, and we did not study the impact of synovitis modulation on cartilage health. We also focused our human tissue study on end-stage OA disease and did not assess synovial PRG4 signaling dysfunction following an acute knee injury or in early-stage OA.