6.1 Dietary breadth among Auquimarca camelids
δ13C values from the Auquimarca camelid enamel carbonates samples (n = 235) ranged from – 15.10‰ (− 2.2% C4 plants) to – 0.94‰ (74.1% C4 plants), with an average of – 8.35‰. If all of the camelids at Auquimarca had been raised and rangestock grazed in the puna, like many modern camelids in the MRV and other highland Andean regions, δ13C values would have been more negative, likely between – 17.9‰ and – 8.5‰ (Szpak et al. 2013; Dufour et al. 2014). These lower values would reflect a primarily C3 diet consistent with the puna grasslands and ecosystem (Mayer 1979; Flannery et al. 1989; Dransart 2002; Thornton et al. 2011; Dufour et al. 2014). Conversely, if the camelids had been primarily given maize fodder and allowed to graze on maize stubble after the harvest, similar to the feeding practices for camelids from Middle Horizon coastal sites, the camelids would have had an overall higher δ13C average, likely between – 1.6‰ to + 2.5‰ (Dufour et al., 2014; Finucane et al., 2006; Noe et al., 2024; Szpak et al., 2013; Thornton et al., 2011; Tomczyk et al., 2019). But the broad range of δ13C values observed in the Auquimarca samples suggests that camelids at Auquimarca had access to both C3 and C4 plants, with some variation in the proportions of these kinds of plants in their diets.
There was major variation in the diets of the 32 individual camelids at Auquimarca. When the δ13C values of the samples associated with a particular individual were averaged, there were significant differences between the means of the individuals from each other and from the population mean, suggesting that multiple husbandry strategies were utilized by those managing the Auquimarca camelid herds. Three individuals (AM-124, AM-142, AM-146) had mean δ13C values greater than 25% of other individuals. They consumed, on average, approximately 58.3% C4 plants in their diets. This is similar to the δ13C enriched group of camelids observed at Conchopata, the urban Wari heartland site where camelids were likely kept in canchas and fed primarily maize (Finucane et al., 2006). Eleven additional camelids in the study sample consumed between 30% to 75% C4 plants (average = 46.4%). These δ13C values are more consistent with Central Andean coastal sites with greater incorporation of maize into camelid diets (average range of 40–70% C4 plants in diet) (Szpak et al. 2019). Auquimarca’s MRV location provides a more suitable location for maize agriculture on wide fields, much like those seen in some coastal areas and lowland areas. Therefore, where other highland kichwa sites have more limited maize influence on human and camelid diets, it appears that many of the camelids at Auquimarca had diets influenced by this environment and possibly by the maize subsistence priorities of the Wari Empire.
In contrast, two individuals (AM-123, AM-144) had mean δ13C values lower than 25% of the study population. They consumed virtually no C4 plants based on Dufour et al’s (2014) method, with an average of – 1.45% C4 plants in their diets. This is more on par with the very low δ13C values of camelids in modern pastoral communities who tend to rangestock graze their livestock in the puna almost exclusively. For comparison, modern camelids from highland areas on the northern and southern Peruvian coasts, analyzed by Thornton et al. (2011) and Dufour et al. (2014), had an average of 8.69% C4 plants in their diets (Table 6). Sixteen (16) additional individuals (18/32) also had low levels of maize consumption, consuming approximately less than 30% C4 plants in their diets (average = 14.3%). This is consistent with other studies of camelids in the Andean highlands, where closer proximity to the puna grasslands and desire to diversify subsistence strategies often led to large levels of rangestock grazing (Browman, 1974; Finucane et al., 2006). At sites such as Beringa and Quilcapampa, camelids were likely primarily pastured on C3 grasses. The minimal incorporation of maize in the diet may reflect Wari imperial influence (ibid; Alaica et al., 2022; Melton et al., 2023).
Visual analysis of the δ13C boxplots for each individual (Fig. 8) supports the existence of camelid groups with varying proportions of C3 to C4 plants in their diets. In these boxplots, the interquartile ranges scarcely overlap with the population mean δ13C value, showing that some of the camelids were eating diets more heavily maize-based while others consumed primarily C3 plants. The variety of diets suggests that those managing the camelids at Auquimarca were not engaged in purely maize foddering or purely rangestock grazing. More likely, separate or flexible pastoral strategies were used that allowed the agropastoralists to lean more heavily on maize foddering or rangestock grazing, while oftentimes incorporating elements of both (Alaica et al., 2022; Eerkens et al., 2014; Finucane et al., 2006; Thornton et al., 2011; Tomczyk et al., 2019). This kind of dimorphic husbandry model, as has been described by Tomczyk et al. (2019), has been observed at Wari-affiliated sites like Conchopata, Castillo de Huarmey, and Cerro Baúl to varying degrees (ibid; Finucane et al., 2006; Thornton et al., 2011).
To compare the flexible husbandry model observed at Auquimarca to subsistence practiced in the MRV, we turn to Browman’s (1970; 1974; 1976) work in the region. He argued that prior to the Middle Horizon, people in this region were primarily engaged in rangestock grazing practices in the puna, with limited horticulture at lower elevations close to the river. With the onset of the Middle Horizon and influence by the Wari Empire, people in the MRV relied more heavily on maize agriculture in the kichwa and camelid meat for protein. Combined with other archaeological evidence from this site, like stone hoes for tilling and butchery marks on camelid remains, the camelids with higher δ13C values seem to support this hypothesis. This suggests that maize was a significant part of livelihoods during the Middle Horizon in the MRV. The lower %C4 in camelid diets from Auquimarca suggest that rangestock grazing methods likely used during earlier periods in the MRV did not disappear during the Middle Horizon. Other studies have suggested that dimorphic and flexible husbandry models like this were used as risk management strategies to withstand maize crop failures (Finucane et al., 2006; Noe et al., 2024; Tomczyk et al., 2019). Furthermore, maintaining some level of rangestock grazing could also have been a cultural practice to keep connections to the mountain spirits, as seen in modern herding communities (Flannery et al. 1989; Dransart 2002; Duche-Pérez and Mamani-Daza 2024).
Analysis of δ13C values within the individual camelids at Auquimarca revealed additional variation in their diets on a smaller time scale. The mean δ13C values of dP3 and dP4 teeth (n = 7 teeth, mean = – 6.6‰) were significantly higher than those of M2 and M3 teeth (n = 22 teeth, mean = – 8.4‰) (Wheeler 1982; Takigami et al. 2020). This reinforces ethnohistoric accounts of camelids staying in the same place for up to two years for training before joining caravans (Flannery et al. 1989). Likewise, visual analysis of the sequential line graphs for dP3/dP4 teeth and M2/M3 teeth (Fig. 10) reveals stark differences in the diets between individual teeth. This supports the idea that multiple flexible pastoral strategies were being practiced by those at Auquimarca. Some pregnant and adult camelids had a fairly constant, primarily C3 diets while others seemed to have a more constant source of C4 plants, like maize, in their diets.
The dP3/dP4 and M1, M2, and M3 teeth differ in the amount of δ13C change within the development of those teeth. δ13C values remain fairly constant from the OCC to the CEJ in dP3 and dP4 teeth, whereas many of the molars exhibited steep increases (AM-123 [M1], AM-125 [M2]), decreases (AM-123 [M2]), or more cyclical patterns (AM-129 [M2], AM-146 [M2], AM-151 [M2], and AM-138 [M3]) of δ13C values between sequential samples (Fig. 10). Although we did not observe significant differences between the intra-tooth samples associated with the earliest and latest periods of development in the molars analyzed, visual analysis of the line plots for these teeth reveals the entire extent of δ13C change across the development of those teeth. Increases or decreases in δ13C values within the molars could reflect movement across the Andean environment throughout life as part of trade networks that connected hinterland communities to each other and to the Wari heartlands: an aspect of the vertical archipelago (Murra 1972; Alaica and González La Rosa 2019; Tomczyk et al. 2019; Alaica et al. 2022; Melton et al. 2023). Camelids then would have had access to different kinds of plants more readily available in different ecological zones. The camelids with more cyclical δ13C change within their teeth could have traveled across microclimates at different elevations, rotating between rangestock grazing in the puna to grazing on the stubble of maize fields after a harvest in the kichwa as part of a seasonal migration, as has been suggested at Castillo de Huarmey and other Andean sites (Dransart 2002; Tomczyk et al. 2019). Alternatively, these patterns could reflect movement of the camelids between ecological zones as part of camelid caravans, consuming different amounts of C3 and C4 plants based on their availability in that environment (Takigami et al. 2020).
Although camelid remains analyzed in this study were found at activity level either within the tombs or in the sediment layer above them, we do not have specific AMS dates from the camelids themselves. The AMS dates from the human burials indicate that Auquimarca was occupied during the Middle Horizon; however, the AMS dates are not entirely homogenous (Krause and Tung 2025). Therefore, it is possible (and likely) that the camelids in this sample were deposited at Auquimarca at different times throughout the Middle Horizon and potentially at periods with varying impacts from imperial Wari hegemony. As such, the multiple pastoral strategies that we have suggested could have been used at differing times during the Middle Horizon rather than occurring concurrently. However, no significant differences were observed between the camelids recovered from inside tombs versus those in the sediment layer at activity level, so if different time periods were represented in the layers, they likely did not have a significant impact on the pastoral activities of those at Auquimarca. Further analysis of these camelid remains, including AMS dates and strontium isotope analysis (87Sr/86Sr), is needed to get a better sense of the depositional timeline and local environment of these camelids.
6.2 Andean mobility among Auquimarca camelids
δ18O values from the enamel carbonate samples (n = 235) ranged from – 12.24‰ to + 0.66‰ VPDB. Dufour et al’s (2014) approximations for δ18Oenamel carb by Andean ecological zone, which account for evaporative and meteoric water sources, are the following: lowland and coastal regions range from – 5.8‰ to + 0.5‰, kichwa regions range from – 6.2‰ to – 2.3‰, and puna regions range from – 15.0‰ to – 5.5‰. Under this model, the camelids at Auquimarca, when looked at collectively, likely inhabited a variety of environments ranging from the coast to the puna, with the average δ18O value (– 6.50‰) falling in the lower puna region. Additionally, the broad range of δ18O values in the sample and the intra-population and intra-individual variation in these values suggests that there was human management of the camelids at Auquimarca, helping determine the kinds of water and plants they had access to and their movement across the Andean landscape (Tomczyk et al. 2019; Carrasco et al. 2022). However, other factors tied to seasonality, like temperature and humidity levels, and the kinds of plants consumed can impact δ18Oenamel carb values, since weaned camelids obtain most of their water from vegetal sources post-weaning and little water from evaporative water sources, so caution must be taken when directly comparing the δ18Oenamel carb values of Auquimarca camelids to general environmental estimations (Kohn et al. 1996; Wright and Schwarcz 1998; Katzenberg 2008; Yann et al. 2016; Carrasco et al. 2022; Enke et al. 2022).
There was less variation between the mean δ18O values of the 32 individual camelids than of those seen in the δ13C dataset. This can be observed in the higher overlap of interquartile ranges with the entire δ18O sample mean among the Auquimarca δ18O boxplots, an indicator that many of the camelids were local to Auquimarca (Fig. 9). However, there were still significant differences between the means of certain camelids and others and many of the individuals have large ranges of δ18O values. This can suggest that a large proportion of the camelids samples from Auquimarca were traversing the Andean landscape throughout their lives, exposing them to a variety of δ18O values in their foods and thus water sources (Weber 2019; Takigami et al. 2020; Melton et al. 2023).
The individual camelids at Auquimarca exhibited significantly lower δ18O values than the camelids sampled at Quilcapampa and Castillo de Huarmey. This is to be expected because these sites are located at lower elevations closer to the coast (Quilcapampa = 800 masl, Castillo de Huarmey = 50 masl) compared to Auquimarca, which is located in the high kichwa region (3220 masl) (Katzenberg 2008; Knudson 2009; Dufour et al. 2014; Tomczyk et al. 2019; Alaica et al. 2022; Noe et al. 2024). Within the full camelid populations at these three sites, there is a much broader range of δ18O values at Auquimarca (n = 235, range = 12.9‰) than at Quilcapampa (n = 10, range = 8.43‰) or Castillo de Huarmey (n = 18, range = 7.32‰). The larger range of δ18O in the population suggests that the camelids at Auquimarca had varied diets and varied migration histories (ibid). It also attests to the lengths people went to - to bring their camelids to this site to engage in mortuary activities and to offer their animals in feasts and as burial offerings in tombs. This is supported by the previously discussed differences in the proportions of C3 and C4 plants between the camelids at Auquimarca. But the sample size at Auquimarca is much larger than those of Quilcapampa or Castillo de Huarmey, so these range values alone do not necessarily represent the entire extent of diet and mobility variation at Quilcapampa or Castillo de Huarmey.
When the δ18O distribution of the entire sample population and the individual camelids are considered alongside intra-individual changes in δ18O values, the extent of movement and dietary diversity within the population is revealed. The mean values of dP3 and dP4 teeth (n = 7 teeth, mean = – 7.8‰) and M2 and M3 teeth (n = 22 teeth, mean = – 6.2‰) significantly differed from each other. But as seen in our carbon data, looking at the line graphs of these teeth show differences in δ18O between teeth in these categories. dP3/dP4 teeth have relatively linear δ18O trends throughout the development of those teeth that range between – 10.8‰ and – 3.08‰ (Fig. 11). From this, the pregnant camelids included in the sample were probably kept in the same region with similar diets for at least the later part of their pregnancy when these teeth would have mineralized (Takigami et al. 2020). But the region and diet in question varied, suggesting that there was no one setting where camelids were kept during pregnancy.
Differences between the M2/M3 teeth are similar to those of the dP3/dP4 teeth. Some individuals had consistently and significantly high δ18O values throughout their enamel development while others had consistently low δ18O values; the range of δ18O from M2 and M3 teeth are – 12.24 to + 0.66‰. So even in later life, the camelids at Auquimarca likely inhabited different environments, further supporting the idea of multiple flexible pastoral strategies at the site (Tomczyk et al. 2019; Takigami et al. 2020; Melton et al. 2023). Some camelids likely inhabited the puna region while others might have been kept closer to human settlements in the kichwa where they consumed greater proportions of C4 plants that could further enrich δ18O values (Kohn et al. 1996; Wright and Schwarcz 1998; Katzenberg 2008; Yann et al. 2016; Carrasco et al. 2022; Enke et al. 2022). Finucane et al. (2006)and others have suggested that differences like this may represent alpacas versus llamas, where alpacas were kept in the puna and llamas were kept closer to human settlements for easier access to be used in trading (Alaica and González La Rosa 2019). However, this assumption has been disputed because llamas and alpacas can live in a single herd and can crossbreed (Shimada and Shimada 1985; Tomczyk et al. 2019). Regardless, this cannot be assessed here because of the fragmented nature of the Auquimarca camelid samples and our inability to tell whether the camelids were alpacas or llamas.
Among the camelid molars sampled, we also see many individuals with large differences in δ18O values between the sequential samples. Once again, there was no significant difference between the δ18O values of the samples associated with earlier and later periods of enamel development, but we do see other patterns between those samples. Visual analysis of the line graphs for δ18O (Fig. 11) shows steady δ18O value increases, decreases, or cyclical patterns of movement across the vertical archipelago in many of the molars studied. Variation in soil water δ18O within an ecological zone due to seasonal changes in humidity, temperature, and precipitation could have also contributed to the observed cyclical patterns of δ18O increase and decrease among the camelids’ sequential δ18O values (Yann et al. 2016). But because of the range of δ18O values between the sequential samples, these camelids were likely moving between coastal/lowland and kichwa or kichwa and puna ecological zones. It is possible that the movement between these regions were the result of the agropastoralists negotiating with their Andean vertical landscape, preventing overgrazing while still having the resources available to produce agricultural products by moving the camelids between ecological zones to protect puna grasslands and provide access to maize stubble after harvests (Tomczyk et al. 2019). This model fits in well with the mixed C3/C4 plant diets observed in many of the individuals. Or, these increases and decreases in δ18O values between the sequential samples could be the result of the camelids moving between ecological zones in order to trade products with other parts of the Wari Empire, as seen among camelids at Castillo de Huarmey and Cerro Baúl (ibid; Thornton et al. 2011). The MRV is such a suitable environment for maize cultivation. It could be that some of the camelids were used as pack animals in caravans to transport this important crop to other parts of the empire in exchange for other goods; unfortunately, this cannot be shown from these isotope analyses alone. Further work must be done to untangle the trade relationships between those at Auquimarca and the rest of the Wari world.