The issue of brass
Brass holds a special significance in the history of metallurgy, at least for China. The large-scale smelting and use of copper alloy began in the Ming Dynasty. Before that, copper products were mostly discovered randomly and in small quantities. The earliest Chinese bronze artifacts date back to the copper knives unearthed from the Majiayao Culture, which were made of tin bronze. Throughout the entire Chinese bronze age, the alloy materials of bronze artifacts were mainly tin bronze and lead-tin bronze. However, However, the Jiangzhai Culture (4700-4000bc) predating the Majiayao Culture, discovered bronze artifacts(Table3). which has sparked considerable academic discussions both at home and abroad. There has been ongoing debate over whether Chinese metallurgy history began in prehistoric times(Fan, et al. 2012).
Ma Yue et al. conducted a statistical analysis on the discovery of Ming Dynasty brass products in China before 2010, totaling 17 pieces. Since then, some brass utensils have appeared successively. This article collected data on 22 pieces (groups) of brass products before the Ming Dynasty(Ling, et al. 2018), which are listed in Table 3 in chronological order.
Table 3 Statistical table of brass products unearthed in China before the Ming Dynasty (Up to the end of 2025)
|
No.
|
Object
|
Find-spot
|
Period
|
alloy composition(wt%)
|
Technology
|
sources
|
|
Cu
|
Zn
|
|
1
|
sheet
|
Jiangzhai Site in Xi'an
|
4700-4000bc
|
66.5
|
25.7
|
Casting
|
①
|
|
2
|
Hairpin
|
site in Weinan, Shaanxi
|
3000bc
|
—
|
32.0
|
Forging
|
|
3
|
sheet
|
site in Shanxi Province
|
2500-2100bc
|
79.46
|
14.01
|
Forging
|
②
|
|
4
|
awl
|
sanlihe site, Jiaoxian, Shandong
|
2300-1800bc
|
—
|
20.2-26.4
|
Casting
|
①
|
|
5
|
awl
|
—
|
20.2-26.4
|
Casting
|
|
6
|
fragment
|
xiaotangshan site in Chifeng, Inner Mongolia
|
2000-1500bc
|
61.2
|
18.4
|
—
|
③
|
|
7
|
sheet
|
59.58
|
38.3
|
—
|
|
8
|
arrow
|
Changdao, Shandong
|
1046-771bc
|
84.4
|
10.9
|
—
|
①
|
|
9
|
arrow
|
82.1
|
11.8
|
—
|
|
10
|
Hairpin
|
Huailin Village,Hebei(东汉)
|
0-2ce
|
78.9
|
18.8
|
Hot working
|
④
|
|
11
|
Hairpin
|
Foyemiaowan-Xindiantai cemetery in Dunhuang(曹魏)
|
2-4ce
|
81.1
|
14.8
|
Forging
|
⑤
|
|
12
|
Hairpin
|
80.6
|
15.0
|
|
13
|
Hairpin
|
73.2
|
22.3
|
|
14
|
ring
|
Yingpan Cemetery in Xinjiang(汉晋)
|
4ce
|
—
|
>20
|
—
|
①
|
|
15
|
earring
|
—
|
>20
|
—
|
|
16
|
bracelet
|
—
|
>20
|
—
|
|
17
|
ring
|
Qilangshan cemetery, Inner Mongolia(北魏)
|
4ce
|
92.0
|
7.3
|
Forging
|
|
18
|
ornament
|
72.8
|
18.3
|
|
19
|
nail
|
M1 in Yihenao'er, Inner Mongolia(北魏)
|
3-5ce
|
79.5
|
20.5
|
Forging
|
⑥
|
|
20
|
nail
|
80.2
|
19.7
|
|
21
|
hairpin
|
Zhaojia Xuyao tomb in Linzi, Shandong(北朝)
|
4-5ce
|
67.2
|
31.0
|
Forging
|
⑦
|
|
22
|
hairpin
|
80.6
|
15.7
|
|
23
|
earpick
|
Emperor Wu's tomb(北周)
|
5ce
|
66.7
|
8.04
|
Casting
|
⑧
|
|
24
|
Temples
|
Tomb No. 2 of Xi'an Kunlun Company(隋代)
|
5-7ce
|
79.25
|
6.65
|
Forging
|
⑨
|
|
25
|
ornament
|
82.97
|
5.6
|
|
26
|
strip
|
Tubo tombs in Dulan, Qinghai(唐代)
|
9ce
|
63.2
|
29.2
|
hot working
|
①
|
|
27
|
hook
|
71.5
|
21.6
|
|
28
|
nose ring
|
71.0
|
19.5
|
|
29
|
buckle
|
70.1
|
22.0
|
Casting
|
|
30
|
buckle
|
75.1
|
17.8
|
|
31
|
drawer pull
|
Liao Mausoleum(辽代)
|
9-11ce
|
79.5
|
12.1
|
Casting
|
⑩
|
|
32
|
sheet
|
xinli site in Beizhen, Liaoning(辽代)
|
9-11ce
|
78.96
|
18.91
|
Forging
|
11
|
|
33
|
table corner protector
|
74.74
|
20.0
|
Heating after casting
|
|
34
|
ornament
|
76.3
|
22.2
|
Forging
|
|
35
|
sheet
|
75.17
|
23.27
|
|
36
|
smoke pot
|
Yuanshangdu site, Inner Mongolia(元代)
|
13ce
|
65.2
|
33.0
|
Casting
|
①
|
|
37
|
Hairpin
|
M8 in Dongxianpo, Zhuozhou, Hebei(元代)
|
12-13ce
|
80.2
|
16.2
|
Casting、hot working
|
④
|
|
38
|
7 Sheets
|
changbai mountain temple site in Jilin (金代)
|
12-13ce
|
76.01-
84.13
|
11.64-
17.13
|
Casting、hot-cold work
|
12
|
|
39
|
21 objects
|
taizicheng site in Zhangjiakou, Hebei(金代)
|
12-13ce
|
82.8-94.4
|
3.5-17.2
|
Casting、hot forging
|
13
|
①Ma Yue, Li Xiuhui(2010). Analysis of the Research Status of Ancient Chinese Brass Products and Smelting Technology [in Chinese]. Journal of Chinese History of Science and Technology.
②Wang Jianping, Wang Lizhi(2013). Preliminary Study on Copper Slices from the Longshan Period Unearthed at the Zhoujiazhuang Site in Shanxi Province [in Chinese]. Journal of the National Museum of China.
③Li Minghua, Lian Jilin, Ge Riletu, et al(2022). Research on Metal Artifacts Excavated from Xiaotangshan Site in Ningcheng County, Chifeng City [in Chinese]. Grassland Cultural Relics .
④Yao Zhihui, Yuan Meng, Ge Long(2025). Technological Analysis and Exploration of Several Brass Pieces in the Collection of Zhuozhou Museum [in Chinese]. Cultural Relics Protection and Archaeological Science.
⑤Qiangbing Wei, Yanxiang Li, Thilo Rehren, et al(2022). Early brass from the Foyemiaowan-Xindiantai cemetery, 265–439 ce: the origin and diffusion of brass in ancient China. Heritage Science. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-022-00784-5
⑥Xie Xinrui, Li Yanxiang, Jing Yongjie, Wang Xiaokun(2020): Preliminary Study on Some Metal Artifacts Excavated from Yihenao'er M1 in Zhengxiangbai Banner, Inner Mongolia [in Chinese]. Grassland Cultural Relics.
⑦Dai Quanlong, Zhao Yichao, Pang Shuo, Zhang Ji(2024). Scientific Analysis and Research on Metal Artifacts Excavated from the Northern Dynasties Tomb of Zhao Family Xu Yao in Linzi [in Chinese]. Haidai Archaeology.
⑧Wang He, Mei Jianjun, Pan Lu, Yang Junchang, Zhang Jianlin(2013). Preliminary scientific analysis of some gold and gilded bronze artifacts unearthed from the Xiaoling Mausoleum of Emperor Wu of Northern Zhou [in Chinese]. Journal of the National Museum of China.
⑨Yanbing Shao, Fengrui Jiang, Jingnan Du et al(2021). Brass products in the coronet excavated from an M2-numbered Sui-Tang-dynasty tomb situated in Kun Lun Company in Xi’an, Shaanxi. Heritage Science. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-021-00625-x
⑩Xiao Hongyan, Dong Xinlin, Cui Jianfeng(2022). Technological Analysis of Copper Artifacts Excavated from the No.1 Accompanying Tomb and No.4 Building Site of Liaozu Mausoleum [in Chinese]. Northern Cultural Relics .
11Wang He, Wan Xiongfei(2024). Preliminary Scientific Analysis of Copper Artifacts Excavated from Xinli Site No.1 in Beizhen City, Liaoning Province [in Chinese]. Northern Cultural Relics .
12Zhao, JJ; Xiao, HY and Cui, JF (2025). Metallurgical analyses reveal brass production in the Northeast China. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences . https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-024-02108-z
13Xiao, HY; Huang, X and Cui, JF (2020) . Local cementation brass production during 12th-13th century CE, North China: Evidences from a royal summer palace of Jin Dynasty. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102657
From Table 3, it can be seen that brass objects before the Han Dynasty in China (No. 1-9) had varying levels of zinc content and were believed to have been accidentally refined. The zinc content of artifacts (No. 10-30) from the Han to Tang dynasties was relatively stable. Some scholars believe that after the Eastern Han Dynasty, with the introduction of Buddhism to China, “toushi(鍮石)” was also introduced from the Western Regions, on par with gold and silver. According to literature records and archaeological discoveries, ancient Romans and Persians refined brass before China. The earliest brass should have come from the West and flowed into China with the Silk Road trade, becoming an important commodity on the Silk Road(Yao, et al. 2025). During the Liao, Yuan, and Jin dynasties, the zinc content of artifacts (No. 31-39) tended to stabilize except for a few. The brass products discovered in China from the Han Dynasty to the Jin Dynasty, from their excavation sites and historical backgrounds, are all located in northern China and are related to grassland ethnic groups and regimes. The brass spoon from the Northern Song Dynasty analyzed in this article is currently the only brass product discovered in the Han ethnic region of southern China, which has the significance of filling the gap in terms of geography, age, and types of objects.
Regarding ancient Chinese brass and its comparison with foreign countries, Cui Jianfeng's team has developed a systematic understanding, believing that there were mainly two methods for smelting brass in ancient China: galvanizing and mineral refining. Spelling refers to the direct preparation of brass using metallic copper and metallic zinc, while cementation involves smelting brass by directly mixing zinc ore with metallic copper. However, due to the highly reactive chemical properties of zinc and its low boiling point (around 907 ℃), it is highly volatile during the smelting process, which led to the late emergence of zinc as a metallic element. As a result, the zinc mineralization method also emerged very late. Before the emergence of zinc smelting technology, cementation was the most important method for producing brass in ancient times, and the brass produced was called "mineralized brass". The history of brass smelting and casting in China can be summarized into four periods based on the characteristics of smelting technology: early prehistoric brass, foreign brass from the Han and Tang dynasties, locally mined brass from the Song to Ming dynasties, and locally zinc plated brass from the Ming and Qing dynasties. This is the basic understanding in the current research field of brass(Cui, 2025). His research also suggests that after the Northern Song Dynasty, driven by economic interests, brass smelting technology rapidly spread among the people, forming a multi center production pattern. As the political and economic center of the Southern Song Dynasty, the Hangzhou area discovered brass tableware such as chopsticks and spoons, indicating that brass may have been mainly used as tableware during the Southern Song Dynasty.
The brass spoon analyzed in this article, as indicated by the “Purchase land certificate” (买地券) unearthed from the tomb, was made no later than 1033 AD. This period belongs to the early Northern Song Dynasty, with rapid economic development. Chengdu, as a developed inland city during the Northern Song Dynasty, should have brass smelting and product consumption. Ancient literature clearly records the activity of smelting local cassiterite during the Song Dynasty, which is related to the use of calamine in Taoist alchemy and medicine. In Cui Fang's "Wai Dan Ben Cao(外丹本草)" during the Song Dynasty, it is recorded that "one pound of copper and one pound of furnace dried sweet stone can be refined into one and a half pounds of cassia stone. In the third year of Jingde (1006 AD), the casting department was established to oversee the production of copper tools. In the fourth year of Jingde (1007AD ), private copper smelting was prohibited. In the second year of Dazhong Xiangfu (1009AD ), the Dianhe Copper Smelting Institute was established to begin official smelting of copper. In the first year of Tianxi (1017 AD), the Dianhe Copper Smelting Institute was merged into the casting department(Gao, 2024). From the perspective of shape and decoration, the brass analyzed in this article is a typical Chinese tableware, which is highly likely to be locally made, adding a new species to ancient Chinese brass products and providing physical evidence for the smelting of local “toushi(鍮石)” in the Song Dynasty.
The issue of coins minting and circulation
Kaiyuan Tongbao was the main circulating currency of the Tang Dynasty, with special significance and an important turning point in the history of Chinese currency, replacing the previously chaotic Five Zhu(五铢钱) system. Kaiyuan Tongbao was first cast in the fourth year of Emperor Gaozu's Wude reign (621 AD) of the Tang Dynasty. It has been in circulation for nearly three hundred years during the Tang Dynasty, and was still in circulation during the Five Dynasties and early Song Dynasty. These two Kaiyuan Tongbao tombs date back to the late Tang and Five Dynasties, and are still within the circulation time range of coins. It is known that practical currency was used in burials during this period.
Qianyuan Zhongbao began to be cast and used in the first year of Qianyuan reign of Emperor Suzong of Tang Dynasty (758 AD), and was withdrawn from circulation in the first year of Baoying reign of Emperor Zongzong of Tang Dynasty (762 AD), lasting for five years. Qianyuan Zhongbao is the first type of copper coin in Chinese history named after "Zhongbao", which opened up a coin writing system that combines "Tongbao, Yuanbao, and Zhongbao", and has epoch-making significance. One Qianyuan Treasure is equivalent to the value of ten Kaiyuan Tongbao. These two Qianyuan treasures, one from a tomb of the late Tang and Five Dynasties, although they have passed their circulation time, are still used as ancient coins in funerals; The other one is from the early Southern Song Dynasty tomb M34, which has already passed its circulation time, indicating that during the Southern Song Dynasty, the coins used for burial in tombs were still from the old dynasty, or from the Tang and Northern Song dynasties were still circulating in Sichuan during the Southern Song Dynasty and used for burial in tombs.
The other three Northern Song coins of M34, Chongning Zhongbao, were one of the important coins of the late Northern Song Dynasty and had the most plate types. They were the second reign title coins of Emperor Huizong of Song, Zhao Ji, and were minted during the Chongning period (1102-1106 AD). Qian Wen Li Shu, with its ancient simplicity and square shape, symmetrical layout, and rigorous structure, can be regarded as a model of ancient Chinese Qian Wen calligraphy. Chongning Tongbao was also the second reign title of Emperor Huizong of Song, Zhao Ji. It was an imperial calligraphy coin, and the Qian script was created by Emperor Huizong of Song in the form of thin gold. The Qian script is thick and orderly, and can be regarded as the pinnacle of Qian calligraphy. The tin content of this Tongbao coin is lower than that of the Zhongbao coin, while the lead content is similar. The Zhongbao coin contains a certain amount of iron, reflecting a significant difference in the alloy composition of the two types of coins issued simultaneously. Xining Yuanbao was the first reign title coin of Emperor Shenzong of Song, Zhao Xu. It was minted during the Xining period (1068-1077 AD) and has two types of inscriptions: seal script and regular script. The coin analyzed in this article is in regular script.
M121 is a tomb from the middle and late Southern Song Dynasty, but three early Northern Song Dynasty gold coins were unearthed. Among them, Chunhua gold coins were the earliest, and were the fourth year name coins of Emperor Taizong Zhao Guangyi. They were minted in May of the first year of Chunhua (990 AD) and personally inscribed with inscriptions by Emperor Taizong, making them the earliest "imperial inscriptions coins". The inscriptions were written in cursive script. Jingde Yuanbao was the second reign title of Emperor Zhenzong of Song, Zhao Heng. It was minted during the Jingde period (1004-1007 AD) and was personally inscribed by Emperor Zhenzong of Song, Zhao Heng. The character "de" was omitted from the horizontal line, continuing the calligraphy tradition before the Tang Dynasty and implying the governance philosophy of "saving virtue to ensure the safety of the world". Xiangfu Yuanbao was the third reign title coin of Emperor Zhenzong of Song, Zhao Heng. It was minted during the Dazhong Xiangfu period (1008-1016 AD) and was personally written by Emperor Zhenzong of Song, Zhao Heng, using cursive script. 'Xiangfu' is a symbol of auspiciousness, representing the meaning of happiness, wealth, and longevity, and is full of auspicious energy.
M188 is a tomb from the middle and late Southern Song Dynasty. Shaoxi Yuanbao was the only year name coin of Emperor Guangzong Zhao Dun of Song Dynasty. It was minted during the Shaoxi period (1190-1194) and was made of copper and iron materials. The copper coins were often engraved with chronological numbers such as "yuan", "two", "three", "four", and "five" on the back. The Shaoxi Yuanbao analyzed in this article is made of bronze material with the character "Er" on the back, which means it was cast in the second year of Emperor Guangzong of Song Dynasty (1191).
In the Chengdu area of the Song Dynasty, only iron coins were minted. Copper coins were produced in the southeastern regions of China, and the Song government strictly prohibited the circulation of copper coins in the region([Song] Li, 2004). The "History of the Song Dynasty: Food and Commodity Annals(《宋史·食货志》)" records: "At that time, there were four monitoring stations for copper coins: Raozhou Yongping, Chizhou Yongfeng, Jiangzhou Guangning, and Jianzhou Fengguo. There were monitoring stations in the capital, Sheng'e Hangzhou, and Nan'an armies, but they were later abolished. For casting coins, three catties and ten taels of copper, one catty and eight taels of lead, and eight taels of tin were used, resulting in a thousand coins weighing five catties. Only Jianzhou increased copper by five taels and reduced lead by the same amount." From literature records and archaeological discoveries, it can be seen that the Song Dynasty's monitoring stations were all established in the mineral rich middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River and southern China, and there was no monitoring station in Sichuan, so the coins in Sichuan came from other regions. Research has shown that the biggest characteristic of the composition of Northern Song Dynasty bronze coins is that the copper, tin, and lead contents are very consistent, or in other words, the distribution of copper, tin, and lead contents is highly concentrated, ranging from 62% to 68% for copper, 6% to 10% for tin, and 22% to 28% for lead(Zhao, et al. 2009). The coins analyzed in this article possess this characteristic. Therefore, based on the records in the literature and the analysis of the coin composition, the copper coins unearthed from the Song Dynasty tombs in Chengdu all came from outside the region. It is speculated that they were brought here through trade. This is because compared to the iron coins used locally, the copper coins were more precious and were buried in the tombs to represent the possession of wealth in the afterlife.