4.1 Strain Evolution around the Joint Hole
During tensile loading, the strain curves at different positions around the hole are shown in Fig. 5, and the locations of the strain gauges are indicated in Fig. 2(a). The significant differences depending on locations can be observed. At position #1, strain initially decreases (indicating compression) as the load increases, showing that the material in this region primarily undergoes compressive loading. As the load approaches the ultimate value, the compressive strain at #1 suddenly decreases, and with further loading, it increases again. In contrast, strains at positions #2 and #4 remain relatively unchanged throughout the loading process, indicating no significant deformation at these positions (i.e., no pronounced lateral deformation around those parts of the hole boundary). At position #3, the strain curve shows compressive strain initially, but as the load increases, it gradually transitions to tensile strain. Notably, when the load reaches 6,124 N, the compressive strain at #3 reaches its limit and reduces to zero at 12,102 N, after which tensile strain rises rapidly with further loading. Overall, the composite around the hole experiences much greater compressive deformation than tensile, suggesting that the hole boundary mainly bears compressive loading during tensile testing, likely leading to a crushing failure at the bore.
Figure 6 shows the strain–load curves for the joints under different aging conditions. In Fig. 6 (a), the curve at gauge #1 displays both linear and nonlinear stages. Under low loads, strain and load are linearly related; however, with higher aging temperatures, the slope of the curve increases markedly, indicating that aging exacerbates matrix damage and causes more severe plastic deformation. As the load further increases, the curve becomes noticeably nonlinear and exhibits a sudden drop in strain. This sudden drop is caused by severe damage at that location (such as matrix crushing, fiber–matrix debonding, and other failure modes), which rapidly reduces the compressive stress and causes the strain gauge to recover, resulting in a sharp drop. With further temperature increase, the composite shows damage under lower loads, shifting this strain-drop point leftward; after that, the compressive strain grows again.
In Fig. 6 (b) and 6 (d), positions #2 and #4 show little effect from aging temperature, indicating that under all aging conditions, these regions undergo no significant lateral deformation. However, their strain curves fluctuate more as load increases, with the amplitude of fluctuation also increasing with aging temperature. This suggests that although these positions do not deform laterally appreciably, the applied longitudinal load still induces some lateral strain fluctuations, which become more pronounced as internal damage intensifies with aging. In Fig. 6 (c), position #3 is significantly affected by aging. The strain–load curves at #3 initially decrease and then increase. For the unaged and 50°C aged specimens, the tensile strength (the load at which tensile strain appears) is relatively high (approximately 14,152 N and 12,547 N, respectively). With aging temperatures of 100°C and 150°C, the tensile strength decreases, so tensile strain appears at lower loads (around 10,578 N and 9,152 N, respectively). This is because higher aging temperatures cause more severe internal damage; as the aging-induced damage accumulates, obvious matrix crushing and interface debonding occur even at the initial loading stage.
4.2 Load-Carrying Performance of Bolted Joints
The load–displacement curves of the composite interference-fit joints under various aging conditions are shown in Fig. 7. The results show a clear linear region in the initial loading stage, indicating that early in loading the joint’s load capacity is primarily governed by friction between the mating surfaces. However, as aging temperature increases, the slope of the load–displacement curve decreases and the bearing stiffness drops significantly. In this study, the bearing stiffness decreased from 11.2 kN/mm at room temperature to 7.3 kN/mm at 150°C, a reduction of 34.8%. As the external load increases further, the load–displacement curve becomes nonlinear. When displacement reaches a certain critical value (due to a large tilt angle of the bolt), the bolt bends and fractures, causing a sudden drop in the load.
Overall, the bearing capacity of the composite joint changes significantly in a thermo-oxidative environment. After 40 days of aging at 50°C, 100°C, and 150°C, the maximum bearing capacities of the joints decrease to 17,124 N, 14,416 N, and 13,317 N, which correspond to 98.8%, 83.2%, and 76.9% of the unaged specimen’s capacity, respectively. At 50°C, thermo-oxidative aging slightly degrades the matrix mechanical properties, causing only a minor reduction in load capacity. When the aging temperature reaches 100°C and 150°C (near the glass transition temperature of the composite), the resin matrix undergoes significant chemical changes and the material’s plasticity increases markedly. In particular, under 150°C aging the load–displacement curve exhibits much more pronounced nonlinearity, indicating significant plastic deformation at the hole periphery and shear failure at the fiber–matrix interface; consequently, the curve is smoother under this condition.
4.3 Failure Modes of Bolted Joints
Figure 8 compares cross-sections of the composite interference-fit joints after tensile failure under different aging conditions: (a) unaged, (b) 50°C, (c) 100°C, and (d) 150°C aging for 40 days. In all cases, there is severe damage at the bolt/composite interface, and the bolt tilt angle differs among the conditions. For the unaged specimen, its mechanical properties remain intact. In the quasi-static tensile test, the composite undergoes a series of damage modes including matrix crushing, fiber breakage, and delamination, which propagate horizontally along the hole. For the specimens aged 40 days at 50°C, 100°C, and 150°C, the bolt axis tilt angles after failure increase to 6.4°, 11.6°, and 11.0°, respectively. Compared to the unaged sample, these final tilt angles are significantly larger, indicating that the composite’s mechanical properties have degraded substantially under the thermo-oxidative environment. Moreover, as the aging temperature rises, the composite’s internal chemical structure softens, further increasing the tilt and damage.
Figure 9 shows the microscopic morphology of the compression (bearing) failure under different aging conditions: (a) unaged, (b) 50°C, (c) 100°C, and (d) 150°C after 40 days of aging. In all cases, both the upper and lower composite plates in the bearing region exhibit clear damage, characterized by shear and compression failure patterns. Under tensile load, the upper plate hole wall is continuously compressed by the bolt shank, causing fiber buckling. At the edge of the washer, as the clamp-up restraint in the thickness direction weakens under compression, the composite experiences shear and delamination damage at the fiber–matrix interface. For the unaged specimen, since its structure and properties remain as originally, quasi-static loading induces matrix crushing, fiber buckling, and delamination that propagate horizontally around the hole, resulting in a compression failure angle of about 31.7°.
In contrast, for specimens aged 40 days at 50°C, 100°C, and 150°C, the compression failure direction angles increase to approximately 39.3°, 45.2°, and 52.3°, respectively. In addition, the gap between the hole wall and bolt is larger in the aged specimens than in the unaged specimen, indicating significant bending deformation of the surface material under compression, with some material displaced into the gap. This is due to pronounced mechanical degradation of the composite under thermo-oxidative aging. At high temperature, in particular, the matrix and fiber–matrix interface strength drop substantially, leading to more severe fiber damage, matrix damage, delamination, and shear failure at the load-bearing surface. Furthermore, high temperatures induce chemical changes in the composite that soften the material, thereby increasing the compression failure angle and exacerbating damage.
Under all aging conditions, the lower plate hole wall is dominated by compression damage, with some material migrating along the thickness direction under compressive stress, causing material buildup. Gaps also appear between the hole wall and bolt, indicating the hole diameter has enlarged under the tensile load. For the unaged specimen, the bolt preload strongly constrains the lower plate in the thickness direction, effectively suppressing shear and delamination damage. Nevertheless, even in this case the joint still exhibits matrix crushing, fiber buckling, and delamination that propagate horizontally from the hole. After 40 days of aging at 50°C, 100°C, and 150°C, the composite’s matrix and interface strengths are significantly weakened by thermo-oxidation, accelerating the aging process. This causes severe degradation of interface bonding strength and matrix properties, resulting in more material buildup on the upper side of the lower plate. In addition, preload relaxation reduces the constraint on the lower plate, leading to a wider area and more severe shear damage and widespread delamination.