The third volume of the Composite Materials Handbook [2] provides methodologies and lessons learned for the design, analysis, manufacture and field support of fibre-reinforced, polymeric-matrix composite structures. It notes that the assessment of cyclic fatigue crack growth in such composite structures, with special relevance to airframes, can be based on either a ‘no-growth’ or a ‘slow-growth’ design philosophy. Whilst the most widely used approach is to adopt a ‘no-growth’ approach, it is accepted that this can result in an overly conservative design. Furthermore, it is now known [3,4] that, even for such ‘no-growth’ designs, delamination growth arising from cyclic fatigue loads can still arise in-service. As such two of the immediate challenges facing the composites community are:
To extend the ‘no-growth’ design philosophy to allow for the nucleation and growth of small naturally-occurring delaminations in composite structures.
To develop the tools needed to provide a conservative estimate for the remaining life, and hence the inspection intervals, for delamination damage found in an operational airframe. (These the tools are needed for aircraft sustainment.)
The principle of ‘slow-growth’ in fibre-reinforced polymeric-matrix composites is applicable to delamination growth under cyclic fatigue loads which is slow and stable. It is recommended [5, 6] that this be analysed using linear-elastic fracture-mechanics (LEFM). This requires a knowledge of the da/dN versus \(\:\varDelta\:\sqrt{G}\:\)curves, where da/dN is the fatigue crack (i.e. delamination) growth (FCG) per cycle and \(\:\varDelta\:\sqrt{G}\) is the\(\:\:\)range of the applied energy release-rate in the fatigue cycle, as defined by\(\:\:\sqrt{{G}_{max}}-\:\sqrt{{G}_{min}}\); where \(\:{G}_{max}\:\)and \(\:{G}_{min}\:\)are the maximum and minimum values of the applied energy release-rate in the fatigue cycle, respectively [7, 8]. Furthermore, the NASA Fracture Design Handbook NASA-HDBK-5010 [6] mandates the use of a ‘worst-case upper-bound’ FCG curve for material selection, design and service-life (sustainment) studies.
This worst-case upper-bound FCG curve for a carbon-fibre reinforced-plastic (CFRP) should:
Exhibit no, or only minimal, retardation, arising from fibre bridging. Since the fastest growing, i.e. lead, delaminations that arise under cyclic-fatigue loading of real composite structures or components from mis-drilled holes, ply drop-offs and impact damage show no, or only little, retardation from fibre-bridging developing across the faces of the delamination as the fatigue crack advances [8].
Allow for scatter in the test data [9, 10].
Encompass, and bound, all the experimental results.
Be representative of, and applicable to, small, naturally-occurring delaminations [11, 12]
However, the experimental determination of valid and relevant da/dN versus \(\:\varDelta\:\sqrt{G}\:\)FCG curves is where major problems have been encountered, which have only relatively recently been identified and resolved. These problems arise from the use of the double-cantilever beam (DCB) test specimen, see Fig. 1, to experimentally measure the Mode I (i.e. opening tensile) da/dN versus \(\:\varDelta\:\sqrt{G}\:\)FCG curves [13]. This test specimen contains a through-thickness crack and has an inserted polymer film to act as a starter crack of length, ao, for the crack from which the FCG measurements will be subsequently taken. However, this polymer film, although typically only about 10 to 13 µm in thickness, acts as relatively blunt crack and must be extended to a length ap so as to give a naturally-sharp crack tip for the subsequent actual measurements. Unfortunately, this requirement for some pre-test crack extension leads to fibre bridging developing across the crack faces, prior to the start of the fatigue test, which subsequently retards the propagation of the delamination under the cyclic fatigue loads. Indeed, the experimental data reveals that such retardation effects cannot be avoided. The experimental data also reveals that the DCB fatigue test results may show a great deal of scatter [9, 10], which in-part arises from fibre-bridging developing during the test. It is, therefore, very difficult to experimentally determine a worst-case upper-bound FCG curve. The same comments are true with respect to determining a valid value of the fatigue threshold, \(\:\varDelta\:\sqrt{{G}_{thr}}\), below which no significant FCG occurs. Finally, in the FCG of metallic structures it is well established that small, embedded, naturally-occurring defects do not behave in the same manner as relatively large through-thickness cracks as used in a typical test specimen [11, 12]. The problem being that such small, naturally-occurring, cracks grow faster than expected from observations of the latter type of through-thickness cracks. In the DCB test only though-thickness cracks can be employed. Consequently, the FCG curves developed using DCB tests are not applicable to a sustainment assessment.
To examine in detail these problems of measuring the FCG rate curves from DCB tests using CFRPs, the European Structural Integrity Society (ESIS), Technical Committee (TC) 4 (on Polymers, Composites and Adhesives) has launched a round-robin study, using Mode I DCB tests, into (a) the effect of the pre-crack length, ap-ao, prior to the start of the measurements from the laboratory cyclic-fatigue test, on the measured FCG rate, da/dN, data and (b) the reproducibility of the FCG rate curves under cyclic-fatigue loads. The first paper from this study [14] confirmed that a key experimental parameter is the value of the pre-crack (i.e. pre-delamination) extension length, ap-ao, in the DCB test specimen prior to any cyclic-fatigue measurements being undertaken. As mentioned above, this phenomenon arises since varying the value of ap-ao typically leads to a varying degree of fibre bridging developing behind the tip of the fatigue delamination, prior to the start of the actual fatigue test. The presence of such fibre bridging may retard the FCG rate and so lead to an impression of enhanced fatigue behaviour that is not present when no, or very, little fibre bridging occurs, as is typically the case in a real composite component. In this study [14], the FCG results were measured by the two independent laboratories and the results were in good agreement. In a second paper [15] it was shown that the Hartman-Schijve equation [7, 8, 16, 17], determined with test data generated [14] under an R-ratio of R = 0.1, could also be used to compute the FCG curves associated with tests performed at R = 0.3, 0.5 and 0.7, where R is the load ratio (= Pmin/Pmax). More importantly, the Hartman-Schijve methodology (a) can be used to determine a worst-case upper-bound da/dN versus \(\:\varDelta\:\sqrt{G\:}\:\)FCG curve which exhibits no retardation, (b) takes into account the experimental scatter, (c) encompasses and bounds all the experimental results and (d) can represent the fatigue growth of small, naturally-occurring delaminations in the CFRP. (The latter curves are needed for a sustainment analysis, i.e. to determine the remaining life of the airframe and hence the inspection intervals.) The main aim of the present paper is to investigate the robustness of this Hartman-Schijve methodology from [14, 15] when the effects of test temperature together with varying the R-ratio [18, 19] are studied.