3.1 Flexural Properties
Figure 3(a) shows the stress-strain curves of hybrid lay-up woven composites, and Fig. 3(b) presents the flexural strength and flexural modulus test results of the composites. It can be seen from the test data in the figures that different hybrid lay-up structures have a impact on the flexural properties of the composites. Among them, the B/B/B/B structure exhibits the highest flexural strength and flexural modulus, while the F/F/F/F structure shows lower flexural strength and flexural modulus. The B/B/B/B structure exhibits excellent flexural properties, which stems from the high modulus and high strength characteristics of basalt fibers—as the main load-bearing phase of the composite, they can improve the overall stiffness of the material. In contrast, the mechanical properties of pure flax fibers are relatively limited, leading to lower load-bearing capacity of the F/F/F/F structure.
The flexural properties of the F/F/B/B and F/B/F/B structures fall between those of the pure basalt fiber lay-up structure (B/B/B/B) and pure flax fiber lay-up structure (F/F/F/F). In terms of specific data, the peak load, flexural strength, and flexural modulus of the B/B/B/B structure are 93.64 N, 106.1 MPa, and 6.93 GPa in sequence; the corresponding performance indicators of the F/F/F/F structure are 15.48 N, 23.36 MPa, and 0.80 GPa.
Among the hybrid lay-up structures, the flexural properties of the F/B/F/B structure are improved, with a peak load, flexural strength, and flexural modulus of 38.25 N, 56.65 MPa, and 3.74 GPa, respectively; compared with the pure flax lay-up (F/F/F/F) structure, the improvement rates are 147.1%, 142.5%, and 366.3% in sequence. The flexural properties of the B/F/B/F structure show the most prominent improvement, with a peak load, flexural strength, and flexural modulus of 48.72 N, 70.53 MPa, and 4.18 GPa, respectively; compared with the pure flax lay-up (F/F/F/F) structure, the improvement rates are 214.7%, 201.9%, and 421.2% in sequence. The flexural properties of the F/F/B/B structure show relatively limited improvement, with a peak load, flexural strength, and flexural modulus of 26.6 N, 39.29 MPa, and 1.46 GPa, respectively; compared with the pure flax lay-up (F/F/F/F) structure, the improvement rates are 71.8%, 68.2%, and 82% in sequence. The peak load, flexural strength, and flexural modulus of the B/B/F/F structure are 31.03 N, 45.82 MPa, and 2.07 GPa, respectively; compared with the pure flax lay-up (F/F/F/F) structure, the improvement rates are 100.5%, 96.1%, and 158.1% in sequence. The strength of F/B/F/B and B/F/B/F is higher than that of F/F/B/B and B/B/F/F, which is attributed to better inter-core adhesion[50].
It is worth noting that the flexural properties of the B/F/B/F structure are superior to those of the F/B/F/B structure, which indicates that basalt fibers can more effectively resist flexural stress when placed in the outer layer. This is attributed to the higher surface layer strength[50]. However, the performance improvement of the F/F/B/B structure is limited, possibly because basalt fibers are concentrated in the inner layer and fail to fully exert their high modulus advantage. Furthermore, by comparing hybrid structures with pure flax lay-up structures, it can be concluded that the hybrid lay-up method can effectively improve the flexural properties of the composites.
Figure 4(a) shows the damage images of composites with different lay-up structures after flexural property tests (observed from three perspectives: impact surface, back surface, and side surface). Combined with the 3D microscopic images of the damaged areas in Fig. 4(b), it is found that the flexural surfaces of different hybrid structures exhibit the same damage characteristics: matrix cracking, slight yarn damage, and whitening of the damaged area. By observing the side bending images, it is found that composites containing basalt lay-ups have a larger bending degree compared with pure flax structures. It can thus be inferred that the better the flexural properties of the composite, the stronger its tolerance to bending degree.
The F/F/F/F and B/B/B/B structures have a single damage mode, and their mechanical responses are dominated by the inherent properties of the laminate, with no interference caused by interlayer property differences. The B/B/F/F and F/F/B/B structures induce interfacial stress concentration due to interlayer mechanical property differences, and the damage shows obvious regional characteristics (brittle fracture of the rigid layer and slow damage evolution of the flexible layer), with their mechanical properties co-regulated by lay-up sequence configuration and interfacial behavior. During the mechanical load transfer process of the F/B/F/B and B/F/B/F structures, due to repeated adaptation of interlayer properties, the interface remains in a stress concentration state, the damage morphology shows alternating complex characteristics, and their strength failure mechanism is controlled by the interfacial damage accumulation process, ultimately exhibiting progressive multi-stage failure behavior.
3.2 Tensile Properties
Since there is no front-back difference in tensile tests, the F/F/B/B and F/B/F/B structures do not require tensile tests on both front and back sides. Figure 5(a) shows the tensile stress-strain curves of composites with different lay-up structures, and Fig. 5(b) presents their tensile strength and tensile modulus test results. Tensile test results show that the incorporation of basalt fibers has a strengthening effect on the tensile strength of the composites. Although the pure basalt lay-up (B/B/B/B) has the highest tensile strength and modulus, the stress decreases after the initial linear stage, followed by a plateau period, and finally rapid fracture occurs. This phenomenon can be attributed to local interfacial debonding caused by fiber buckling during the hot-pressing process. In contrast, the pure flax lay-up (F/F/F/F) exhibits more excellent ductility. However, the F/F/B/B and F/B/F/B structures maintain high tensile strength while also exhibiting a certain degree of ductility.
Specific data are as follows: the peak load, tensile strength, and tensile modulus of the B/B/B/B structure are 1378.8 N, 19.16 MPa, and 5.41 GPa, respectively; the corresponding parameters of the F/F/F/F structure are 713.13 N, 9.51 MPa, and 1.26 GPa, respectively. The tensile properties of the F/B/F/B hybrid structure are improved compared with the pure flax lay-up (F/F/F/F) structure; its peak load, tensile strength, and tensile modulus are 1181.88 N, 15.76 MPa, and 3.95 GPa, respectively, which are 65.7%, 65.7%, and 213.5% higher than those of the pure flax lay-up (F/F/F/F) structure. The peak load, tensile strength, and tensile modulus of the F/F/B/B hybrid structure are 944.02 N, 12.59 MPa, and 3.40 GPa, respectively, which are 32.4%, 32.4%, and 170.0% higher than those of the pure flax lay-up (F/F/F/F) structure.
The performance of the F/B/F/B structure is superior to that of the F/F/B/B structure; this difference indicates that when basalt fibers are uniformly dispersed, the stress transfer efficiency is higher—uniformly distributed fibers can bear loads more continuously and suppress local stress concentration. When basalt fibers are concentrated in the inner layer (F/F/B/B structure), the early fracture of outer flax fibers causes load overload of inner basalt fibers, resulting in the failure to fully release their strengthening potential.
Figure 6 presents the damage morphologies of composites with different lay-up structures after tensile tests. Analysis of the damage morphologies shows that: the B/B/B/B lay-up structure exhibits obvious fiber buckling, with large-area cracks in the matrix in the damaged area, and buckling causes stepped fracture of basalt fibers; fiber pull-out and resin plastic deformation can be observed in the damaged area of the pure flax lay-up (F/F/F/F) structure; the damaged area of hybrid structures exhibits a mixed fracture mode; the addition of flax lay-ups reduces the buckling degree of basalt fibers during the hot-pressing process, and the rough surface of flax fibers improves the wetting effect of PLA resin, with no macroscopic delamination observed.
3.3 Low-Velocity Impact Properties
Figure 7 shows the impact response characteristics of composites with different fiber hybridizations. Test results show that under 3 J and 5 J impact energies (as shown in Fig. 7(a), (b)), the force-time curves exhibit a typical three-stage characteristic: Stage Ⅰ is a rapid load rise period with no obvious decline; Stage Ⅱ shows a load decline accompanied by fluctuations; Stage Ⅲ shows a sudden load drop due to impactor rebound or specimen perforation. It is worth noting that with the introduction of basalt lay-ups, the peak load and initial curve slope of flax/basalt hybrid composites show a faster increasing trend compared with the pure flax lay-up (F/F/F/F). The analysis results show that the load fluctuation in Stage Ⅱ mainly originates from the asynchronous fracture of flax fibers and basalt fibers.
Impact displacement change directly reflects the deformation capacity of materials, and the displacement characteristics of different lay-up structures differ. As shown in Fig. 7(c), (d), the pure flax lay-up (F/F/F/F) exhibits the maximum displacement, which is 25.3 mm and 14.75 mm under 3 J and 5 J impact energies, respectively, consistent with the ductile fracture characteristics endowed by the high elongation at break of flax fibers. In contrast, the pure basalt lay-up (B/B/B/B) has the smallest displacement, which is 5.63 mm and 7.16 mm under 3 J and 5 J impact energies, respectively. This is mainly due to the high modulus characteristic of basalt fibers, which makes them more prone to brittle fracture under impact and limits their plastic deformation capacity. Hybrid lay-up structures achieve controllable adjustment of displacement characteristics through synergistic effects, and their displacements are all between the pure flax lay-up (F/F/F/F) and pure basalt lay-up (B/B/B/B). Compared with the pure flax lay-up (F/F/F/F), the displacement of hybrid lay-ups decreases by 22.85% and 56.2% under different impact energies, respectively, reflecting the effective restriction of basalt lay-ups on the deformation of flax lay-ups. The displacement stability of alternating lay-ups (F/B/F/B, B/F/B/F) is better, while the displacement change of concentrated lay-ups (F/F/B/B, B/B/F/F) is more affected by structural discreteness, further confirming the important influence of lay-up sequence on deformation coordination.
Peak impact force is a key indicator to measure the initial impact resistance of materials, and test results show that the peak forces of different lay-up structures differ. As shown in Fig. 7(e), (f), the pure flax lay-up (F/F/F/F) has the lowest peak impact force, which is 253.28 N and 245.10 N under 3 J and 5 J impact energies, respectively, consistent with the inherent mechanical properties of natural fibers. The pure basalt lay-up (B/B/B/B) exhibits an extremely high peak force, which is 1362.74 N and 1699.14 N under 3 J and 5 J impact energies, respectively, increasing by 438% and 593% compared with the pure flax lay-up (F/F/F/F), highlighting the advantages of high strength and high modulus of basalt fibers. Hybrid lay-up structures achieve optimized adjustment of peak force through fiber synergistic effect. Taking the B/F/B/F lay-up as an example, its peak force is 508 N and 1158.2 N under 3 J and 5 J impact energies, respectively, increasing by 100.57% and 372.54% compared with the pure flax lay-up (F/F/F/F), but only 37.3% and 68.2% of the pure basalt lay-up (B/B/B/B), indicating that the introduction of flax lay-ups can effectively alleviate stress concentration at the initial stage of impact. The influence of lay-up sequence on peak force is particularly: alternating lay-ups (F/B/F/B, B/F/B/F) perform best in terms of mechanical property balance; when basalt is used as the outer layer (B/F/B/F lay-up), its peak force increases by 12.4% and 18.7% compared with the F/B/F/B lay-up under 3 J and 5 J impact energies, respectively, which is related to the direct bearing effect of outer high-strength fibers on impact load; however, concentrated lay-ups (F/F/B/B, B/B/F/F) exhibit higher damage dispersion due to interfacial stress concentration, further verifying the advantage of alternating lay-ups in stress distribution uniformity.
Comprehensive analysis results show that hybrid lay-up structures have a impact on the impact resistance of composites. In terms of energy absorption, hybrid lay-ups are generally superior to the pure basalt lay-up (B/B/B/B), among which the B/F/B/F alternating lay-up performs best, while concentrated lay-ups have abnormal performance fluctuations. In terms of displacement characteristics, hybrid lay-ups achieve controllable adjustment of displacement between the pure flax lay-up (F/F/F/F) and pure basalt lay-up (B/B/B/B) through the synergistic effect of basalt and flax fibers, and the displacement stability of alternating lay-ups is better. In terms of peak force, although the pure basalt lay-up (B/B/B/B) has an extremely high peak force, hybrid lay-ups can effectively alleviate stress concentration while improving peak force through reasonable lay-up design, among which alternating lay-ups (especially the B/F/B/F lay-up with basalt as the outer layer) perform best in terms of mechanical property balance. In general, alternating lay-up structures (F/B/F/B, B/F/B/F) can effectively exert the synergistic advantages of hybrid lay-ups and exhibit good impact resistance under both 3 J and 5 J impact energies; however, concentrated lay-ups have the disadvantage of high damage dispersion due to issues such as interfacial stress concentration.
Low-velocity impact test results show that composites with different lay-up structures have differences in energy absorption performance. As shown in Fig. 7(g), (h), the energy absorption value of the pure flax lay-up (F/F/F/F) is at a medium level, but its energy absorption value under 5 J impact energy is 72.2% higher than that under 3 J impact energy. This fluctuation is mainly related to the performance discreteness of natural fibers, which may originate from fiber orientation deviation or uneven resin wetting during sample preparation. The energy absorption value of the pure basalt lay-up (B/B/B/B) is relatively low, which is 3.62 J and 5.84 J under 3 J and 5 J impact energies, respectively, closely related to its brittle fracture characteristics. The energy absorption performance of hybrid lay-up structures is generally superior to that of the pure basalt lay-up (B/B/B/B), with an improvement range of 2.6% and 20.2%, which is mainly attributed to the progressive development of delamination damage and the plastic energy dissipation mechanism of flax fibers. Among them, the B/F/B/F alternating lay-up maintains the highest energy absorption value under both 3 J and 5 J impact energies, which are 4.35 J and 6.14 J, respectively, indicating that alternating lay-up structures can effectively extend the energy dissipation path. It is worth noting that the energy absorption of F/F/B/B and B/B/F/F concentrated lay-ups increases abnormally under 5 J impact energy, with increases of 2.64% and 1.69%, respectively. This phenomenon may be related to the change in local energy dissipation mechanism caused by interfacial defects.
Figure 8(a) shows the damage morphologies of composites with different fiber hybridizations under 3 J and 5 J impact energies. Impact surface, back surface, and side surface views show that the pure flax lay-up (F/F/F/F) has a large damage range after impact, with obvious cracking and fiber pull-out observed on both the impact surface and back surface, and delamination visible on the side surface; the damage of the pure basalt lay-up (B/B/B/B) shows brittle characteristics, manifested as concentrated cracks with fast propagation rate, and fine cracks distributed on the impact surface and back surface. 3D microscopic images (corresponding areas in Fig. 8(b)) further reveal the microscopic damage characteristics: in the F/F/F/F lay-up, due to the high elongation at break of flax fibers, the damage is dominated by ductile fracture, manifested as fiber tearing and scattered resin matrix cracking; in the B/B/B/B lay-up, the high modulus characteristic of basalt fibers makes its damage exhibit brittle fracture characteristics, with cracks propagating rapidly along the fiber direction and penetrating the entire structure.
Among hybrid lay-ups, the damage morphology of alternating lay-ups (F/B/F/B, B/F/B/F) is easier to control, and the damage degree of their impact surface and back surface is between the pure flax lay-up (F/F/F/F) and pure basalt lay-up (B/B/B/B); basalt lay-ups can restrict the excessive deformation of flax lay-ups, while flax lay-ups can delay the crack propagation of basalt lay-ups, for example, the damage distribution of the F/B/F/B lay-up is more scattered; concentrated lay-ups (F/F/B/B, B/B/F/F) have high damage dispersion due to interfacial defects under 5 J impact energy, and interfacial stress concentration will cause local severe cracking. The above results show that the lay-up method has a impact on the damage mode of composites after impact, among which alternating lay-ups perform better in terms of damage control and performance balance.