We have established that the increasing complexity of the material world's structure occurs through the manifestation of a universal meta-process, which we propose to term «Hierarchical synthesis». Hierarchical synthesis is a universal law of the universe, describing the process of generating complexity through a recurring cycle: stable level of organization (N) → mandatory phase of transient meta-level (cooperation and restructuring) → emergence of a new stable level (N+1) with emergent properties, which in turn becomes the basis for initiating the next cycle of hierarchical synthesis.
The transient meta-level is not merely "embedded" in hierarchical synthesis—it is its engine and necessary phase. Without this transient, meta-stable phase of reorganization, a leap to the next level of complexity is impossible. The universal structure of the transient meta-level represents a dynamic state that inevitably arises between two stable levels of organization as a mechanism for qualitative transition. It is triggered by an internal limit or external challenge that cannot be resolved within the existing system. In response, the system enters a phase of destabilization, where old rigid connections disintegrate, and elements, losing part of their autonomy, engage in multiple trial, unstable cooperations. This is a period of maximum plasticity and internal conflict, where old and new patterns compete. From this chaos, through processes of competition and selection, one dominant configuration gradually channels and strengthens—the nascent order parameter of the future whole. It begins to subordinate the behavior of elements, reducing entropy and variability, marking the integration phase. The process concludes with the consolidation of a new structure, which, gaining stability, exits the transient state, demonstrating fundamentally new, emergent properties. Thus, the transient meta-level performs the function of a universal and necessary "reorganization protocol"—the narrow gate through which any system must pass to leap to the next level of complexity, transforming crisis into a new whole.
Fractal nature of hierarchical synthesis: conceptual grounding
The universal algorithm of hierarchical synthesis, manifesting at all levels of material organization, demonstrates fundamental properties of fractal structures. A fractal is a geometric figure, mathematical model, or natural object (process) characterized by self-similarity—the property where a part of the structure repeats the whole at a reduced scale. This means that the same organizational pattern is observable when changing the scale of the system. Classic mathematical examples include the Koch curve, Sierpinski triangle, and Mandelbrot set.
In nature, fractal principles underlie the structure of trees (branching), circulatory and respiratory systems (optimization of resource delivery), coastlines, and clouds. The most important quantitative characteristic of a fractal is its fractal dimension (Hausdorff dimension), which can be expressed as a non-integer (fractional) number. Unlike Euclidean objects (line — 1D, plane — 2D, cube — 3D), fractal dimension reflects the degree of complexity, the "filledness" of space by the structure. For example, the Koch curve has a dimension of approximately 1.26, indicating greater complexity than a smooth line but less than a plane. The principle of hierarchical synthesis is fractal in essence:
1. Process Self-Similarity. The basic sequence "level N → transient meta-level (cooperation) → level N+1 with emergent properties" recursively repeats at qualitatively different scales—from molecular interactions to cosmogonic processes.
2. Scale Invariance. Universal transition criteria (destabilization, pattern competition, integration around an order parameter, consolidation) remain invariant when transitioning between levels, corresponding to a fractal pattern.
3. Recursive Generation of Complexity. The new stable level (N+1) itself becomes an element for the next act of cooperation, similar to how a fractal structure unfolds through infinite application of a simple rule.
Thus, the entire observable hierarchy of the Universe is the result of recursive application of this single fractal algorithm, obeying the regularities of hierarchical synthesis.
Philosophical foundations of hierarchical synthesis
Hierarchical synthesis represents a fundamental mode of existence for complex systems, manifesting at all levels of material organization. Unlike static ontological models, this principle emphasizes the procedural nature of existence, where stability arises as a dynamic equilibrium between integration and disintegration processes (Prigogine & Stengers, 1984). The relationship between part and whole in such systems is characterized by dialectical unity: elements retain relative autonomy while simultaneously participating in the formation of new wholes with emergent properties (Bertalanffy, 1968). Temporality and processuality act as key ontological categories in the context of this principle. Each level of organization exists as a temporary stabilization in a continuous flow of transformations, where periods of relative stability alternate with phases of bifurcational transitions (Haken, 1983). This processual understanding of being finds reflection in the concept of "becoming" as opposed to static "being," fundamentally distinguishing the proposed approach from the substantial ontology of classical philosophy (Whitehead, 1978).
Cognitive strategies for the study of hierarchical synthesis require the development of new methodological approaches overcoming the limitations of traditional reductionism. A synthesis of analytical methods aimed at identifying elementary components and holistic approaches that account for emergent properties of whole systems is necessary (Kauffman, 1993). This implies the development of a special categorical apparatus capable of adequately describing self-organization processes at different levels of complexity. The problem of reduction and emergence acquires particular significance in the context of this principle. If classical reductionism sought to reduce the properties of the whole to the characteristics of its constituent elements, the principle of hierarchical self-organization acknowledges the fundamental irreducibility of emergent properties arising at each new level of integration (Clayton & Davies, 2006). This raises the question of the need to develop a non-reductionist methodology capable of accounting for both continuity and qualitative uniqueness of different organizational levels.
Historical prerequisites of hierarchical synthesis can be traced in various philosophical traditions. Aristotelian concepts of wholeness, with his doctrine of four causes and the idea of the irreducibility of the whole to the sum of its parts, represent one of the first attempts at comprehending hierarchical organization (Aristotle, 2019). Leibnizian monads and the principle of pre-established harmony, despite their metaphysical nature, contain an important proposition about the coordination of elements within a whole (Leibniz, 2014). A.N. Whitehead's process philosophy with its emphasis on eventfulness and interconnectedness of all elements of reality offers an ontological foundation for understanding the dynamic nature of hierarchical self-organization (Whitehead, 1967). Russian cosmism, particularly V.I. Vernadsky's ideas about the biosphere and noosphere, develops the notion of interconnection between different organizational levels and the co-evolution of natural and social systems (Vernadsky, 1997).
Manifestations of hierarchical synthesis at the atomic-molecular level
Hierarchical synthesis finds expression already at the level of elementary particles, atoms, and molecules, where self-organization manifests as a fundamental property of matter. The formation of atomic nuclei from nucleons and electron shells demonstrates the emergence of qualitatively new properties not reducible to the characteristics of their constituent elementary particles (Prigogine & Stengers, 1984). The part-whole relationship in chemical systems is particularly evident in the formation of chemical compounds, where molecules acquire properties absent in individual atoms, indicating genuine emergence (Bunge, 2003). Temporality and processuality of molecular complexes reflect the dynamic nature of chemical bonds and molecular conformations. Modern research shows that many molecular systems exist as dynamic ensembles, constantly rearranging between various conformational states (Lehn, 1995). This processuality is especially pronounced in biological macromolecules, where functional activity is directly linked to the ability for reversible structural rearrangements (Alberts et al., 2014).
Cognitive strategies in chemistry and molecular physicsrequire a combination of quantum-mechanical and statistical approaches. On one hand, quantum mechanics allows describing the behavior of individual particles; on the other, statistical physics is necessary for understanding collective properties of molecular ensembles (Atkins & Friedman, 2010). This methodological duality reflects the fundamental impossibility of completely reducing properties of complex molecular systems to those of their individual components. The problem of reduction and emergence in chemical systems acquires particular acuteness when considering the transition from atoms to molecules. Although chemical properties can formally be derived from quantum-mechanical principles, the practical impossibility of such derivation for complex systems points to the ontological status of emergent properties (Hendry, 2022). The principle of hierarchical self-organization finds convincing confirmation in the theory of chemical evolution, which traces the transition from simple molecules to complex biopolymers through successive stages of self-organization (De Duve, 2005).
Self-organization of molecules into supramolecular complexes represents a classic example of the universal principle's manifestation. The formation of lipid bilayers, molecular crystals, and supramolecular ensembles demonstrates molecules' ability for spontaneous formation of ordered structures (Whitesides & Grzybowski, 2002). These processes are characterized by cooperativity of interactions, where the formation of initial structures facilitates subsequent self-organization. Cooperative effects in chemical reactions, such as autocatalytic cycles and oscillatory reactions, provide convincing experimental confirmations of the hierarchical self-organization principle. The Belousov-Zhabotinsky reaction and other oscillatory systems demonstrate the emergence of temporal and spatial structures in homogeneous chemical media (Epstein & Pojman, 1998).
Hierarchical synthesis in biological systems
At the molecular level, the principle of hierarchical self-organization manifests in cooperative interactions within biochemical networks, where enzymatic complexes function as coordinated systems. Metabolomics research demonstrates that cellular metabolism represents not merely a set of separate reactions but an integrated network with emergent properties (Alberts et al., 2014). Symbiogenesis, extensively studied by Lynn Margulis, serves as a classic example of forming a new organizational level through the integration of previously independent organisms (Margulis, 1993). The cell represents the result of multi-level integration, where various organelles and molecular complexes function as a coordinated system. Modern cell biology data show that the eukaryotic cell arose through a series of symbiogenetic events, each creating a new level of functional wholeness (Lane, 2015). Molecular machines, such as ribosomes and proteasomes, demonstrate properties of transient functional wholes arising during the execution of specific tasks (Misteli, 2020).
Ontogenesis can be viewed as a sequence of hierarchical self-organization phases, where each developmental stage is characterized by the formation of temporary functional wholes. Embryonic organizers, described by Spemann, act as self-organization centers coordinating the development of complex structures (Gilbert, 2016). Critical periods of development represent bifurcation points when the system transitions to a new organizational level.
Immunological research reveals complex tolerance mechanisms allowing two genetically different organisms to function as a single system (Moffett & Colucci, 2014). The placental barrier functions not merely as a filter but as an active interface for inter-organism communication. The immune system demonstrates properties of a distributed para-organismal structure, where individual cells and molecules respond coordinately to external influences (Medzhitov, 2021).
The transient para-organismal level of structural organization as a particular manifestation of the transient meta-level in biology is described in the preprint by Lemeshchenko V.V. (2025). An example of such a para-organismal structure is the "mother-placenta-fetus" system, which represents a classic example of hierarchical self-organization, where two genetically different organisms form a temporary functional whole (Burton & Fowden, 2015). The placenta functions as a unique interface, providing not only substance exchange but also complex immunological and endocrine communication (Turco et al., 2018). Emergent properties of this system include the formation of immune tolerance, synchronization of physiological processes, and coordinated fetal growth (Mor et al., 2010).
In oviparous amniotes (reptiles, birds), the egg represents an isolated para-organismal system where the embryo develops in an autonomous environment provided by yolk reserves and protected by specialized membranes of dual origin—both from the embryo itself and the mother (Packard & Seymour, 1997). This system also exhibits properties of a transient para-organismal level of structural organization: temporary wholeness (incubation period), functional specialization of membranes, and emergent properties of the developing system (Deeming, 2004). Critical points in both cases are transition moments: implantation and birth in placental species; the beginning and end of incubation in oviparous species. These transitions are characterized by qualitative changes in the organization of the biological system (Cross et al., 2003). Such a manifestation of the transient meta-level in the series of amniotes is proposed by Lemeshchenko V.V. (2025) to be considered «a transient para-organismal level», located between the organism and population levels.
Social insects, such as ants and bees, form superorganisms where individual individuals function as elements of a single system. Sociobiology research shows that such systems possess emergent properties not reducible to the behavior of individual individuals (Wilson, 2012). Cooperative behavior and division of labor ensure the functional wholeness of the colony as a single organism. Ecosystems represent complex hierarchies of self-organizing systems where various species form stable cooperative networks. Modern ecology views ecosystems as dynamic wholes possessing self-regulation properties (Levin, 1998). Vernadsky's biosphere concept finds new understanding through the prism of hierarchical synthesis, where the biosphere appears as a global self-organizing system (Vernadsky, 1991).
Hierarchical synthesis in social and cultural systems
Social institutions (family, state, economic systems) demonstrate all characteristics of hierarchical self-organization. The family as the elementary unit of society represents a transient system where individuals form a functional whole with emergent properties not reducible to the qualities of individual members (Giddens, 1984). State institutions arise as a result of cooperation among numerous individuals, creating new organizational levels with their own normative structure and regulatory mechanisms (North, 2005). Economic systems, as demonstrated by North and supported by Hayek, are formed through the self-organization of economic agents, generating macroeconomic regularities that cannot be derived from individual behavior (Hayek, 1945). Educational systems and scientific communities represent a special class of para-organismal structures. Academic communities, according to Kuhn, function as whole systems developing paradigmatic foundations for scientific inquiry (Kuhn, 1962). Educational institutions create temporary cooperative "teacher-student" systems where qualitatively new knowledge arises, not reducible to the simple sum of transmitted information (Vygotsky, 1978).
Consciousness can be viewed as an emergent property arising in the "brain-culture" system. Modern cognitive science research shows that consciousness results from the integration of neural networks and cultural patterns (Clark, 2008). Language functions as a para-organismal system existing in the space between individuals and ensuring coordination of collective activity (Deacon, 1997). Art and science as products of hierarchical self-organization demonstrate culture's ability to generate new meaning systems. Artistic works and scientific theories exist as autonomous meaning universes living their own lives in cultural space (Lotman, 1990). These systems possess the property of temporality—they arise, reach peak influence, and transform, yielding to new cultural forms.
Vernadsky's noosphere concept acquires new resonance in the context of technological evolution. The technosphere represents a global para-organismal system where technological artifacts form a whole with its own developmental dynamics (Vernadsky, 1998). Digital technologies create fundamentally new forms of transient meta-level—from virtual communities to distributed computing systems.
Artificial intelligence in the context of the universal principle can be considered a new form of self-organization. Modern AI systems demonstrate emergent properties not programmed by their creators (Mnih et al., 2015). The interaction of human and artificial intelligence generates hybrid cognitive systems with qualitatively new capabilities.
Human as a meta-transient para-organismal system: interdisciplinary perspectives
The concept of the transient para-organismal level finds its most complete expression in understanding humans as complex hierarchical systems unifying biological organisms, mental processes, and social interactions into a dynamic functional whole. Modern research demonstrates that at the biological level, humans exist as a symbiotic "macroorganism-microbiome" system where microbial communities perform key metabolic and regulatory functions, forming a single ecological unit (Gilbert, Sapp & Tauber, 2012; Sender, Fuchs & Milo, 2016).
Human mental organization represents an emergent property of the integration of cognitive, affective, and motivational processes, arising on the basis of neurophysiological structures but not reducible to them (Thompson, 2007). A unique characteristic of humans as a transient meta-level is the ability to generate autonomous para-organismal systems overcoming spatiotemporal limitations of the biological substrate.
Biological transcendence is accomplished through reproduction, where offspring inherit and transform genetic information, creating new independent organisms (Jablonka & Lamb, 2005). Intellectual transcendence manifests in creating scientific theories, artistic works, and technological artifacts that acquire independent existence in cultural space, living their own lives independently of the creator (Jablonka & Lamb, 2005; Lotman, 1990). Social transcendence is realized through educating students and followers who continue and develop ideas and practices beyond the individual existence of their creator (Mead, 1934; Bourdieu, 1990).
In the sociological dimension, the concept of humans as a transient meta-level offers a new approach to understanding social institutions as derivatives of the human ability to create para-organismal systems. This allows rethinking institutionalization processes as the formation of stable structures arising from temporary interactions (Bourdieu, 1990; Giddens, 1984).
For anthropology, understanding culture as a manifestation of a meta-process generated by human activity opens new possibilities for analyzing cultural dynamics and mechanisms of tradition transmission across generations (Lotman, 1990; Ingold, 2000).
In psychiatry, the concept of the transient meta-level provides a theoretical basis for understanding mental disorders as disturbances of wholeness and balance between different manifestations of para-organismal organization (Fuchs, 2018). Developmental psychology gains the opportunity to consider personality formation as a process of complication and integration of the transient para-organismal level, where age-related crises correspond to bifurcation points in the restructuring of the para-organismal system (Thompson, 2007; Mead, 1934).
The philosophical significance of this concept lies in proposing a solution to the problem of personal identity through acknowledging the distributed nature of identity in created systems and cultural artifacts (Thompson, 2007; Jablonka & Lamb, 2005). Development prospects of this approach are associated with creating an integral anthropology overcoming traditional dualisms of body and consciousness, individual and society, biological and cultural (Thompson, 2007; Ingold, 2000; Fuchs, 2018).
This paradigm allows considering human existence as a continuous process of creating and transforming complex organizational systems, ensuring a unique ability to overcome one's own biological and psychological boundaries. The interdisciplinary potential of the concept opens new possibilities for dialogue between natural and human sciences, offering a unified conceptual apparatus for describing human complexity in all its fullness and multidimensionality.
Cosmogonic implications of hierarchical synthesis
The hierarchy of structures in the Universe demonstrates sequential complication of material organization through self-organization mechanisms. From the quark-gluon plasma of the early Universe to the formation of hadrons and atoms, a universal pattern of new organizational levels emerging through cooperation of elementary components is traceable (Peebles, 2020). Modern cosmology reveals an amazing unity of physical laws operating at all scales—from quantum to galactic superclusters (Rees, 2000). Self-organization in physical systems manifests in the formation of dissipative structures described by Prigogine, where in open systems far from thermodynamic equilibrium, ordered states spontaneously arise (Prigogine & Stengers, 1984). The anthropic principle in the context of hierarchical synthesis acquires new resonance: the fine-tuning of fundamental constants can be viewed as a necessary condition for the possibility of sequential unfolding of hierarchical levels of material organization (Barrow & Tipler, 1986).
The formation of galaxies and stellar systems represents a large-scale process of cosmic self-organization. Protogalactic clouds, consisting primarily of hydrogen and helium, under gravitational forces form complex structures with emergent properties (Mo, van den Bosch & White, 2010). Stars as thermonuclear reactors become factories for producing heavy elements, creating a necessary condition for the subsequent emergence of planetary systems and biological evolution. Planetary systems can be considered as a result of hierarchical synthesis on a cosmic scale. Their formation and evolution demonstrate features characteristic of the universal principle: temporality of existence, functional wholeness, and emergent properties (Lissauer & de Pater, 2019). The emergence of life, as a manifestation of system emergence during hierarchical synthesis (author's assumption), in a cosmic context appears as a natural stage of cosmic evolution, where prebiotic chemistry and subsequent biological evolution realize the principle of increasing self-organization at a new level of complexity (De Duve, 1995).
The unity of micro- and macrocosm finds natural explanation within the framework of hierarchical synthesis. Fundamental physical interactions determining the behavior of elementary particles, through successive organizational levels, manifest in macroscopic properties of complex systems (Wilczek, 2021). This approach overcomes the traditional gap between quantum and classical physics, offering a holistic vision of physical reality. The problem of multiple worlds in the context of the universal principle acquires a new dimension: if the principle of hierarchical self-organization is truly universal, then in other regions of the Universe with suitable conditions, complex hierarchically organized systems should also arise (Kasting, 2010). Cosmic evolution and humanity's place in it appear as a particular manifestation of universal laws of self-organization, where human consciousness and culture represent one possible path for realizing the principle of hierarchical complexity (Dick, 1996).
Methodological problems of hierarchical synthesis
A key methodological problem is developing clear criteria for identifying manifestations of hierarchical synthesis. Operationalizable parameters are needed to distinguish genuine cases of hierarchical self-organization from simple aggregations or random coincidences (Bunge, 1998). Proposed criteria include: presence of emergent properties, temporary nature of functional wholeness, presence of critical transition points, and the ability to generate new organizational levels. The problem of falsifiability, formulated by Popper as a criterion of scientificity, presents particular difficulty for universal principles (Popper, 2002). To verify the principle of hierarchical self-organization, developing specific testable predictions that could be refuted by empirical data is necessary. One possible path is formulating specific hypotheses about the existence of certain types of transitional structures in various domains of reality.
Interdisciplinary approaches become a necessary condition for adequately researching the universal principle. Integrating methods from synergetics, complex systems theory, developmental biology, and social sciences allows identifying invariant organizational patterns at different levels of reality (Mitchell, 2009). However, such integration requires overcoming terminological and methodological barriers between disciplines.
The danger of unjustified holism and panpsychism represents a serious challenge for developing the principle of hierarchical self-organization. Critics rightly point to the risk of endowing any systems with properties of wholeness and goal-directedness (Nagel, 1979). To avoid these extremes, clear distinction between metaphorical and literal application of concepts of organization and purposiveness is necessary. The problem of demarcating principle manifestations requires developing clear boundaries of concept applicability. The question of which systems can be considered examples of hierarchical self-organization remains open (Dupré, 1993). Both excessive expansion and unjustified narrowing of the concept must be avoided. Relationship with other universal theories, such as evolution theory, synergetics, or systems theory, requires careful methodological analysis (Bertalanffy, 1968). The principle of hierarchical self-organization should not replace existing theories but can serve as a meta-theoretical basis for their integration. A key task is determining the specific contribution of the proposed principle to understanding universal mechanisms of complexity organization.
Practical and ethical implications of hierarchical synthesis
Hierarchical synthesis opens new perspectives for scientific research, offering an integral paradigm for studying complex systems. A new research program is forming, aimed at identifying general patterns of organization at different levels of reality—from molecular interactions to social structures (Mitchell, 2009). This program implies developing a special methodological apparatus capable of adequately describing processes of emergence, stability, and transformation of hierarchically organized systems. Interdisciplinary projects based on the principle of hierarchical self-organization allow overcoming traditional fragmentation of scientific knowledge. Research uniting specialists from various fields—from physics and biology to sociology and cognitive sciences—can identify invariant patterns of self-organization (Nowotny, Scott & Gibbons, 2001). Educational implications of the principle include the need to develop new academic courses oriented towards forming holistic thinking and understanding the unity of organizational laws in nature and society (Sterling, 2001).
The principle of hierarchical self-organization implies rethinking attitudes towards nature through recognizing the value and wholeness of natural systems at all organizational levels. Understanding nature as a set of interconnected hierarchical systems forms the basis for a new ecological consciousness (Leopold, 1949). Social responsibility in cooperative systems acquires particular significance in the context of acknowledging the interdependence of all elements in complex social structures. Ecological ethics based on the principle of hierarchical self-organization emphasizes the necessity of preserving not only individual species but also entire ecosystems as functional units of the biosphere (Naess, 1989). This approach implies humanity's responsibility for maintaining equilibrium in global systems, considering humanity's special role as a being capable of consciously influencing self-organization processes on a planetary scale.
Research prospects for hierarchical synthesis are associated with developing quantitative models allowing prediction of the emergence and dynamics of complex systems (Holland, 2014). Of particular interest is studying critical transition points between organizational levels and factors determining the stability of emerging structures. Possible technological applications of the principle include developing adaptive control systems, bio-inspired materials, and methods for regulating complex networks (Ball, 2018). Philosophical horizons opened by the principle are associated with rethinking humanity's place in the universal hierarchy of self-organizing systems and developing a new anthropology overcoming traditional divisions (Jonas, 1984).