Distribution of Carbapenem-Resistant Bacteria across hospital and household setting
A total of 248 participants were included in this study comprising 81 index patients (65 admitted to pediatric wards and 16 to surgical wards) and 81 matched caregivers. Additionally, 58 healthcare workers and 28 index household members participated. Combining hospital and household phases of the study, we obtained a total of 412 isolates from the msupercarba plates, with 179 from patients, 140 from caregivers, 50 from healthcare workers and 43 from household members during follow-ups. The presumptive species from the selective plate culturing were Escherichia coli (n = 161 isolates), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 87 isolates), Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 58 isolates), Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n = 47 isolates), Enterobacter cloacae (n = 28 isolates), Pseudomonas putida (n = 23 isolates), Delftia acidovorans (n = 6 isolates) and Achromobacter xyloxidans (n = 2 isolates).
The prevalence of carbapenem-resistant bacteria (CRB) in this study is calculated with the number of isolates that grew on selective CRB plates and confirmed resistant to at least one of the carbapenem drugs tested. CRB colonization was very high in the studied population. A total of 141 isolates were found to be resistant to at least one of the tested carbapenems. The predominant CRB species were Escherichia coli (40.42%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (19.14%) and Acinetobacter baumannii (10. 63%).
Prevalence of carbapenem-resistant bacteria colonisation in hospital
Of the 220 participants enrolled at hospitals, on their day of admission (D0), only 62 remained under follow-up by day 4, as the majority were discharged early. The overall prevalence of CRB at the hospital, increased from 7.3% on D0 to 22.7% by D8 (Table 1). A total of 81 carbapenem resistant isolates were found in samples collecting in hospital setting. The predominant CRB species were Escherichia coli (47.03%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (26.04%) and Acinetobacter baumannii (7.40%).
Specifically, the prevalence of CRB among patients ranged from 11.11% (9/81) on admission to 26,31% (5/19) by D8 of hospitalization (Table 1). However, in a few instances like on day 6, some patients were unavailable for sampling but were sampled again on day 8 (Table 1). A total of 45 CRB were isolated from patients during hospitalization. The predominant CRB species were Escherichia coli (n = 20 isolates), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 12 isolates) and Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 3 isolates).
Among caregivers CRB colonization evolved from 1.23% (1/81) at admission to 18.75% (3/16) by day 8. Similar to the case of patients, some caregivers skipped sampling on day 6 and were sampled again on day 8 (Table 1). A total of 20 CRB were isolated from caregivers during their stay in hospital. The predominant CRB species were Escherichia coli (n = 11 isolates), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 4 isolates) and Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 2 isolates).
The number of sampled healthcare workers dropped over time due to their scheduled shifts. However, based on consistent follow-up of the same healthcare workers that were available from day 0 to day 8, the prevalence of CRB increased from 10.34% (6/58) to 22.22% (2/9) on day 8 (Table 1). A total of 16 CRB were isolated from caregivers during their stay in hospital. The predominant CRB species were Escherichia coli (n = 8 isolates), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 6 isolates) and Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 1 isolates).
Table 1
Distribution of participants carrying confirmed carbapenem-resistant bacteria (CRB) by sampling day at the hospital
Days | Patients carrying CRB | Caregivers carrying CRB | Healthcare workers carrying CRB | Number of participants carrying CRB (%) |
|---|
D0 | 9/81 | 1/81 | 6/58 | 16/220 (7.3) |
D2 | 12/79 | 6/78 | 3/47 | 21/204 (10.3) |
D4 | 3/22 | 3/25 | 0/15 | 6/62 (9.7) |
D6 | 2/11 | 3/11 | 0/12 | 5/34 (14.7) |
D8 | 5/19 | 3/16 | 2/9 | 10/44 (22.7) |
Prevalence of carbapenem-resistant bacteria colonisation in household
At discharge, 30 patients had tested positive at least once during hospitalization. Of these, 29 patients and 28 household contacts consented to home follow-up. The corresponding 30 caregivers were also included in the household follow-up phase. The overall prevalence of CRB colonization at home on D0 of return was 8% increasing to 57.1% by D14 during the follow-up (Table 2). A total of 60 carbapenem resistant isolates were found in samples collecting in household setting. The species at home were consistent with those that were detected in hospital setting i.e. Escherichia coli (30%), Acinetobacter baumannii (15%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (8.33%).
Specifically, the prevalence of CRB among patients at household ranged from 13.79% (4/29) on admission to 40% (2/5) by D14 (Table 2). It is important to note that some patients were unavailable for sampling at certain time points during the 14-day follow-up. A total of 27 CRB were isolated from patients at household. The predominant CRB species were Escherichia coli (n = 9 isolates), Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 5 isolates) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 2 isolates).
Among caregivers CRB colonization reached 60% (3/5) by day 14. As observed with patients, some caregivers were not available for sampling at certain time points during the 14-day follow-up period (Table 2). A total of 14 CRB were isolated from caregivers at household. The predominant CRB species were Escherichia coli (n = 5 isolates), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 2 isolates) and Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 2 isolates).
At the household level, 10.71% (3/28) of household contacts were already colonized with CRB on the day the index patient or caregiver returned home. This proportion increased to 75% (3/4) by day 14 (Table 2). Among the 25 household members who initially tested negative upon the return of a positive patient or caregiver, 6 became colonized with CRB over time. A total of 19 CRB were isolated from household contact the follow up. The predominant CRB species were Escherichia coli (n = 4 isolates), Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 2 isolates) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 1 isolate).
Table 2
Distribution of participants carrying carbapenem-resistant bacteria (CRB) by sampling day in households.
Day | Patients carrying carbapenem resistant bacteria | Patients Guards carrying carbapenem resistant bacteria | Household contacts carrying carbapenem resistant bacteria (total) | Number of participants carrying carbapenem resistant bacteria (total) |
|---|
D0 | 4/29 | 0/30 | 3/28 | 7/87 = 8% |
D2 | 6/16 | 4/14 | 3/25 | 13/55 = 23.6% |
D7 | 5/21 | 4/23 | 4/21 | 13/65 = 20% |
D9 | 1/10 | 1/13 | 1/5 | 3/28 = 10.7% |
D14 | 2/5 | 3/5 | 3/4 | 8/14 = 57.1% |
Distribution of the bacterial species by whole genome sequencing (WGS)
A total of 141 isolates were resistant to one of the carbapenem tested, from which 41 were selected for short-reads WGS to support the clinical study. The selection was made to represent each sampling group and potential species sharing cases identified above. Before sequencing the 41 isolates were further confirmed by meropenem inactivation test and all tested positive. Among sequenced genomes, Escherichia coli was the most prevalent species (34.1%, n = 14), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (29.3%, n = 12) and Acinetobacter baumannii (14.6%, n = 6). Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (14.6%, n = 6) were found to be sequenced and were excluded for further analysis.
Distribution of Resistance genes
All sequenced isolates, except Pseudomonas putida, carried at least one carbapenem or cephalosporin resistant genes (Table 3). Among Escherichia coli isolates, blaNDM−5 (n = 6) and blaOXA−181 (n = 6) were the most frequently carbapenemase genes. Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 10) and Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 5) predominanly harbored blaNDM−1. The blaVIM−5 gene was found exclusively in Achromobacter xyloxidans (n = 2). The most commonly detected ESBL gene was blaCTX−M−15 (n = 16).
Table 3
Distribution of carbapenemase and ESBL resistance genes among sequenced isolates.
Bacterial species (n) | blaNDM-1 | blaNDM-5 | blaOXA-181 | blaOXA-like | blaVIM-5 | blaCTX-M-15 | CMY-2 | blaCTX-M-36 |
|---|
Escherichia coli (14) | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 11 | 2 |
Klebsiella pneumoniae (12) | 10 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
Acinetobacter baumannii (6) | 5 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Achromobater xylosoxidans (2) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Pseudomonas putida (1) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Genetic characteristics of carbapenem-resistant isolates harbouring plasmids
The most represented sequence types (STs) were Escherichia coli ST410 (n = 11) and Klebsiella pneumoniae ST147 (n = 10). Among Acinetobacter baumanii isolates, ST860 (n = 3) was the most represented lineage (Table 4).
Table 4
Distribution of sequence types among selected sequenced genomes.
Bacterial isolates | ST410 | ST167 | ST657 | ST147 | ST967 | ST11 | ST860 | ST1463 | ST107 |
|---|
Escherichia coli (14) | 11 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Klebsiella pneumoniae (12) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Acinetobacter baumannii (5) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
Among the sequenced isolates, Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae were the only species harboring plasmids. All Escherichia coli ST410 (n = 11) isolate harboured the IncFII plasmid type. None Acinetobacter baumanii isolates carried plasmids (Table 5).
Table 5
Plasmid replicons present in selected sequenced genomes.
| | IncFII | IncX3 | IncXI | IncR | IncFII | IncFIB | IncHI1B | IncL/M |
|---|
Escherichia coli (14) | 11 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Klebsiella pneumoniae (12) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 1 |
Genetic context of carbapenem resistance genes
After initial short-read analysis, six isolates (E. coli, A. baumannii and K. pneumoniae) suspected to be part of a transmission network were selected for long-read sequencing using Oxford Nanopore technology to obtain fully assembled genomes for comprehensive analysis. These isolates originated from both hospital and community settings and were recovered across multiple time points. Genomic analysis revealed that they shared key genotypic characteristics, including resistance gene profiles, plasmid content, and sequence types, with other isolates suspected to be part of the same transmission cluster.
Hybrid assemblies (Fig. 2) illustrate the genetic context of carbapenemase genes in Escherichia coli (panel a); Acinetobacter baumannii (panel b) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (panel c). These analyses reveal that plasmids of the same IncF family are responsible for mobilizing blaNDM genes in E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates from both hospitals and household environments. In Acinetobacter baumanii, where carbapenem resistance is chromosomally encoded, blaNDM genes are located within an insertion sequence (ISAba 125) carrying the composite transposon Tn125 (Fig. 2, Panel C).
Hybrid genome assemblies were further used to reconstruct the genetic context of the two representative carbapenemase-carrying plasmids (Fig. 3). The predominant plasmid types mediating dissemination in both healthcare and community settings were IncF types (IncFII for blaNDM−5 and IncFI for blaNDM−1). These carbapenemase genes were concentrated in genome regions co-localized with multiple antimicrobial resistance determinants.
Genomic transmission networks
We reconstructed the transmission networks of carbapenemase-producing bacterial strains identified in this study (Fig. 4).
Three Acinetobacter baumannii ST860 strains carrying the blaNDM−1 gene were isolated from a discharged patient (C22), their caregiver (C26, initially negative upon the patient’s return home), and a household contact (C24, also initially negative) (Fig. 4a). The caregiver and household contact tested positive two days after the index patient’s return. However, SNP analysis (≥ 30) did not confirm their genetic relatedness.
Persistent colonization was observed in patient 3 from hospital admission (Day 0) through Day 14 at home (M33, M50, M51, and M69) (Fig. 4b). Additionally, three K. pneumoniae ST147 isolates were recovered from the patient’s caregiver between Day 2 and Day 14 at home (M34, M53, and M70). SNP analysis revealed ≤ 30 differences between these genomes, indicating a closely related genetic background and suggesting that the strain was introduced into the household by the discharged patient.
A potential transmission event was identified from the caregiver of patient 1 on Day 7 in the hospital (L62) to patient 1 on Day 2 at home after discharge (L71) (Fig. 4c). Core-genome SNP analysis revealed approximately 20 SNP differences, confirming a closely related genetic background and supporting the transmission of E. coli ST410 from hospital to household.
A potential transmission event of E. coli ST410 was also observed from the caregiver of patient 3 on Day 4 at home (T18), persisting in the caregiver until Day 9 (T34), and subsequently detected in both patient 3 and their household contact on Day 9 (T33, T34) with ≤ 20 SNP differences (Fig. 4d). Patient 3 was found colonized with this strain on Day 2 of hospitalization, and the isolate was confirmed via long-read sequencing. Given the timeline, this event suggests community-level transmission of a multidrug-resistant clone.
Whole genome-based phylogenetic tree
Figure 5 presents core-genome phylogenetic analyses of Acinetobacter baumannii (Fig. 5a), Escherichia coli ST410 (Fig. 5b), and Klebsiella pneumoniae ST147 (Fig. 5c). These analyses illustrate phylogenetic clustering based on country of origin, year of isolation, and sample type. Newly sequenced strains are compared with publicly available genomes carrying similar genetic markers (blaNDM−1 or blaNDM−5), providing insights into their genetic relationships and potential transmission pathways. The blue shading in Fig. 5 indicates the clade of isolates from this study.
Two distinct phylogenetic clusters were observed for A. baumannii carrying blaNDM−1. One cluster represented strains from Benin, which were genetically distinct from Nigerian isolates, suggesting localized evolutionary divergence (Fig. 5a). These strains were isolated from diverse clinical samples (blood, rectal swabs, and wound samples), indicating a consistent infection source within the region but clear geographical differentiation.
E. coli ST410 carrying blaNDM−5 demonstrated phylogenetic closeness between strains from this study and those from Nigeria, forming a tightly clustered lineage (Fig. 5b). This suggests regional dissemination of a shared genetic lineage. Samples were obtained from urine, rectal swabs, and wounds across multiple years (2020–2023), indicating the sustained circulation of this lineage.
K. pneumoniae ST147 carrying blaNDM−5 formed a distinct cluster positioned between Nigerian and Ghanaian isolates, suggesting intermediate evolutionary traits (Fig. 5c). Compared to older regional isolates, the strains in this study demonstrated closer phylogenetic relationships for strains, indicating potential recent transmission events.