Oral health is an essential component of general health and well-being, affecting nutrition, communication, and quality of life. Poor oral health can lead to pain, infection, tooth loss, and systemic complications, while also contributing to social and economic disadvantage. The global distribution of oral diseases reveals sharp disparities between and within countries, largely influenced by income, education, and access to preventive care. Understanding these disparities helps contextualize Zambia’s situation within the broader public health framework.
Global Perspective
Globally, oral diseases remain among the most prevalent non-communicable diseases, collectively affecting 3.5 to 4 billion people, more than half of the world’s population (WHO, 2020). Dental caries in permanent teeth remains the single most common health condition worldwide. Periodontal disease, severe tooth loss, and oral cancers also contribute significantly to disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). The Global Burden of Disease Study (Marcenes et al., 2013) showed that oral health problems increased in absolute numbers between 1990 and 2010 due to population growth and ageing, even though their proportional burden declined slightly.
High-income countries have seen marked improvements in oral health because of fluoride use, improved hygiene, preventive programs, and better access to care. In contrast, most developing countries continue to face a double burden, rising rates of dental decay alongside limited access to professional dental care. The cost of dental treatment often exceeds the total health expenditure available per person in many low- and middle-income settings, making prevention the most practical approach (FDI, 2015).
Regional Perspective (Africa)
In Africa, oral health problems remain a neglected public health issue. Studies across the continent reveal a consistent pattern of low service coverage, shortage of dental professionals, and limited preventive care (Thorpe, 2006; Petersen, 2003). The African region is characterized by an overall low to moderate prevalence of dental caries, but this is expected to rise due to increased urbanization, higher sugar consumption, and reduced natural fluoride exposure (Moynihan & Petersen, 2004). Rural and peri-urban communities often have no access to dental services other than emergency extractions.
Serious oral conditions such as noma (cancrum oris), acute necrotizing gingivitis, and oral manifestations of HIV/AIDS still occur in many parts of Sub-Saharan Africa (Thorpe, 2006). Oral cancers are also on the rise, often diagnosed at advanced stages due to lack of screening and awareness. The shortage of dental professionals is severe: some countries have ratios as low as 1 dentist per 150,000 people, compared to 1:2,000 in high-income nations (Vanek, 2017). Oral health ranks low among government priorities, with most available resources directed toward life-threatening diseases such as HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria (Ndiaye, 2010).
Cultural reliance on traditional healers further complicates service utilization. In many communities, herbal remedies are used to treat oral pain or infections, delaying professional intervention (Agbor & Naidoo, 2015).
Zambia’s Context
In Zambia, oral health services remain limited and concentrated in urban referral and district hospitals. Over 80% of the population is estimated to suffer from oral conditions such as dental caries, gum disease, malocclusion, facial trauma, halitosis, and oral tumors (MOH, 2012). Despite this high prevalence, most people only visit dental clinics when pain becomes severe, resulting in high extraction rates and very few preventive or restorative procedures (Mukena, 2010).
There is no standalone national oral health policy, and oral health is integrated only superficially within the broader primary health care framework. Most health centres, particularly in peri-urban and rural areas, lack dental equipment, materials, and trained personnel. Oral health education and community outreach are minimal. The HIV epidemic has also compounded the oral disease burden, with increased prevalence of oral lesions among immunocompromised individuals (Shary et al., 2018).
The Kalingalinga Health Centre in Lusaka exemplifies these challenges: high patient volumes, limited staff, inadequate equipment, and services mainly restricted to extractions. Preventive and promotive programs are rare, reflecting the general national pattern of low oral health service utilization.
The reviewed literature highlights that oral health is a global concern, with low- and middle-income countries bearing a disproportionate share of the burden. In Africa, and particularly in Zambia, oral health remains an overlooked component of public health, constrained by limited policy attention, inadequate human resources, and economic barriers. Despite the preventable nature of most oral diseases utilisation of available services is low.
2.1 Theoretical Review
Two behavioural theories principally underpin this study: the Health Belief Model (HBM) and the Andersen Behavioral Model of Health Services Use.
Health Belief Model (HBM)- Rosenstock (1974)
The HBM posits that health-seeking behaviour is determined by individuals’ perceptions of: (a) susceptibility to a health problem, (b) severity of the condition, (c) benefits of the recommended action, and (d) barriers to action. Self-efficacy (confidence in one’s ability to act) and cues to action (triggers to prompt behaviour) were later added. Applied to oral health, HBM explains why many people delay dental visits until pain appears: perceived susceptibility and severity may be low, perceived barriers (cost, fear, time) are high, and cues to action (health education, screening) are weak. This model guided the present study’s exploration of patient beliefs, perceived barriers (economic, psychological, cultural) and the role of health promotion as a cue to preventive behaviour.
Andersen Behavioral Model of Health Services Use Andersen (1968)
Andersen’s model organizes determinants of service use into three domains: predisposing factors (demography, education, health beliefs), enabling resources (income, insurance, service availability), and need (perceived and evaluated need). The model emphasises that even when need exists, utilisation depends on enabling resources and socio-cultural predispositions. For Kalingalinga, Andersen’s framework helped structure investigation of how socio-economic status, service availability, and perceived need interact to produce low utilisation of preventive dental services.
Together, HBM and Andersen’s model provide a comprehensive lens: HBM focuses on individual cognitive drivers (beliefs, fears, perceived benefits/barriers), while Andersen situates those drivers within structural and resource contexts (availability, affordability, organization of services). The study uses HBM to probe individual attitudes and Andersen to interpret system-level constraints- enabling a mixed analysis of demand- and supply-side factors influencing oral health service utilization.
2.2 Conceptual Framework
INDEPENDENT VARIABLES
2.3 Research Gaps
Existing literature documents many drivers of low oral health service utilisation in low- and middle-income countries (cost, fear, access), but there is limited context-specific evidence for peri-urban Lusaka settings such as Kalingalinga. Notably, gaps exist regarding: (a) how community beliefs and reliance on traditional remedies interact with perceived need and affordability, (b) the relative weight of system-level constraints (equipment, staffing) versus individual barriers in public health centre contexts, and (c) actionable policy-relevant recommendations that reflect both patient and provider perspectives. This study addresses these gaps by collecting linked quantitative and qualitative data from patients and dental staff at Kalingalinga Health Centre.