General Methods. Solvents were dried by standard procedures. All reagents were of commercial quality and were used as supplied unless otherwise specified. The analysis of the purity of the malonyl-peptide synthesized was carried out by RP-HPLC in a Shimadzu equipment I-760-287, column C18 (Vydac, 4.6× 150 mm, 5 µm), and the injection volume of 100 µL. The mobile phases used were 0.1 (v/v) of TFA in water (A) and 0.05% (v/v) of TFA in acetonitrile (B). A linear gradient of 5 to 60% of B during 35 min., with a flux of 0.8 mL/min, was used to elute the analyte. The retention time (Rt) and the peak area (Pas) were determined at a wavelength of 226 nm. FTIR spectra were carried out using ATR of the solid compounds. The ESI-MS spectra were obtained in orthogonal hybrid configuration spectrometers Q-Tof 1 or Q-Tof 2 (Micromass, England) with a nanospray ionization source. The voltages of the borosilicate capillary and the inlet cone were set at 900 and 35 V, respectively. A solution of sodium and cesium iodide was used as a reference for the calibration of the spectrometer. The Masslynx version 4.1 program (Micromass, England) was used for the processing of mass spectra. The accepted error for the determination of the experimental MM was 0.01% of the theoretical MM. 1H NMR spectra were recorded in methanol-d₄ (CD₃OD) at 700 MHz, and 13C NMR at 175 MHz with a Bruker Avance 700 instrument. The one-bond heteronuclear correlation (HSQC), the long-range 1H-13C correlation (HMBC), and 1H-15N correlation (HSQC) spectra were obtained by use of the inv4gs and the inv4gslplrnd programs with the Bruker software. TGA analyses were carried out under air and nitrogen in a TATGA-Q500 apparatus. The sample (∼ 0.5 mg) was introduced inside a platinum crucible and equilibrated at 90°C, followed by a 10°C/min ramp between 90 and 1000°C.
All molecules were built with Avogadro (Hanwell et al. 2012), and DFT calculations were performed with ORCA 4.2.1 (Neese et al. 2020). All structures were pre-calculated using the B97-3c(Brandenburg et al. 2018b) composite scheme as a fast DFT approach. Then structures were optimized using DFT with a hybrid functional PBEh-3c composite scheme, which includes a polarized double-ζ basis set and London dispersion correction with Becke–Johnson damping (D3BJ) method (Grimme et al. 2015). This method presents very good accuracy at a reasonable computational cost. Very tight convergence as keywords were employed, improving the numerical precision as Orca implantation permits. The Lebedev302 grid (Grid4) during the SCF iterations and Lebedev434 (Grid 5) as a final grid for the final energy evaluation after SCF convergence were set for integration precision. No imaginary frequencies were found after calculations of frequencies on optimized structures using the same level of theory. Optimized structures were used for the calculation of properties and visualization of the electrostatic potential. Most properties were predicted by QikProp from Schrödinger(Schrödinger Release 2024-4: Maestro, Schrödinger 2024) packaged using DFT optimized structures. For the molecular electrostatic map, first the mep.py Python script written by Marius Retegan(M. Retegan, 2019, Mep.Py. mep.py (source code), github repository, https://gist.github.com/mretegan/5501553. n.d.) was used for cube file preparation, and then visualized using VMD 1.9.3(Humphrey, Dalke, and Schulten 1996) Non-covalent interactions were generated by Multiwfn 3.7.(Lu and Chen 2012) program, and then NCIPLOT 4.0 (Boto et al. 2020) software was used. The VMD program was used together with vmd script generated by NCIPLOT, the visualization of NCI.
Solid Phase Peptide Synthesis of the malonyl-octapeptide (1):
General Resin preparation:
Fmoc Rink amide MBHA resin (0.015 mmol) was placed in a peptide synthesis vessel, swollen in DMF, and deprotected with 5 ml of 20% piperidine/DMF for 4 min. Washings between the first deprotection, coupling, and subsequent deprotection steps were carried out with DMF (5 × 0.5 min) and DCM (5 × 0.5 min) using 10 ml of solvent/g of resin each time.
The peptide was synthesized manually on MBHA® resin, functionalized with the spacer Am (4-(2,4-methoxy benzhydryl)phenol acetic acid), by a stepwise solid-phase procedure (Fmoc-Am-MBHA, 0.50 g, 0.48 mmol/g, 0.35 mmol) using the Fmoc/tBu (fluoren-9-ylmethyloxycarbonyl/tert-buthyl) strategy. The coupling of each amino acid was achieved using the activating mixture of DIC (218 µL, 1.38 mmol)/HOBt (diisopropylcarbodiimide/1-hydroxybenzotriazole). The completion of the reaction was verified by the ninhydrin test. The order of addition of each amino acid was: Fmoc-Ala-OH x H2O (0.46 g, 1.40 mmol), Fmoc-Gly-OH (0.42 g, 1.41 mmol), Fmoc-Val-OH (0.48 g, 1.41 mmol), Fmoc-Asp(tBu)-OH (0.58 g, 1.41 mmol), Fmoc-Gly-OH (0.42 g, 1.41 mmol), Fmoc-Arg(Pbf)-OH (0.91 g, 1.40 mmol), Fmoc-Ala-OH x H2O (0.46 g, 1.40 mmol), Fmoc-Leu-OH (0.49 g, 1.40 mmol). The successive deprotection of the Fmoc group was carried out using a solution of piperidine (20%) in DMF (N, N-dimethylformamide) for 20 min. Afterward, the peptide was purified in order to get rid of the excess of piperidine, through four washes of 1 min for each one with DMF. The covalent binding of the malonyl group to the N-terminus of the peptide was carried out using malonic acid (0.15 g, 1.44 mmol) and the mixture of O-(Benzotriazol-1-yl)-N,N,N´,N´-tetramethyluronium tetrafluoroborate, TBTU (0.45 g, mmol/g) and N,N-Diisopropylethylamine, DIEA (356 µL) in DMF at room temperature. The resulting malonyl-peptide was cleaved from the resin using the mixture trifluoroacetic acid/triisopropylsilane/water (TFA/TIS/H2O, 95:2.5:2.5) for 2 h. It was then precipitated over diethyl ether at -80°C and centrifuged. Finally, the product was dissolved in a mixture of acetonitrile/H2O (1:2) and then lyophilized. The product was isolated as a white solid. Yield: 82% (330 mg, 0.82 mmol).
ATR-FTIR: ν 2423, 2959, 2925, 2855, 1740 (C = O), 1462, 1492, 1462, 1186, 1061, 969 cm− 1. 1H NMR (700 MHz, CD3OD) δ 8.74 (d, J = 5.9 Hz, 1H, NH), 8.28 (m, 2H, HA-NH2, NH), 8.26 (d, J = 5.6 Hz, 1H, NH), 8.22 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H, NH), 8.18 (t, J = 5.8 Hz, 1H, NH), 7.97 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H, HB-NH2, NH), 7.85 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H, NH), 7.46 (s, 1H, NH), 7.40 (t, J = 5.3 Hz, 1H, NH), 7.08 (s, 1H, NH), 4.75 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H, H12), 4.32 (m, 1H, H18), 4.29–4.24 (m, 3H, H4, H6, H8), 4.08 (m, 1H, H14), 3.90–3.81 (m, 4H, H2, H16), 3.48 (d, J = 16.2 Hz, 1H, H10a), 3.32 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, H10b), 3.20 (q, J = 6.7 Hz, 2H, H27), 2.92 (dd, J = 17.0, 6.5 Hz, 1H, H29a), 2.78 (dd, J = 17.0, 7.1 Hz, 1H, H29b), 2.20 (m, 1H, H31), 1.91 (m, 1H, H25a), 1.81–1.73 (m, 2H, H21, H25b), 1.70–1.57 (m, 4H, H26, H20), 1.41 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H, H24), 1.38 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H, H34), 0.99 (m, 12H, H23, H32, H33), 0.93 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H, H22).
13C{1H} NMR (176 MHz, CD3OD) δ 177.9 (COOH), 175.8 (COOH), 175.8 (COOH), 174.8 (C = O), 174.5 (C = O), 174.1 (C = O), 173.6 (C = O), 172.8 (C = O), 171.9 (C = O), 171.4 (C = O), 170.6 (C = O), 158.7 (C28), 61.4 (C14), 55.0 (C4), 54.9 (C8), 51.6 (C12), 51.5 (C6), 50.4 (C18), 43.9 (C16), 43.8 (C2), 43.1 (C10), 42.0 (C27), 41.0 (C20), 36.3 (C29), 31.0 (C31), 29.3 (C25), 26.1 (C26), 25.8 (C21), 23.3 (C23), 21.6 (C22), 19.6 (C32), 18.72 (C33), 18.0 (C34), 17.00 (C24). 15N{1H} NMR (71 MHz, CD3OD) δ 127.21, 121.65, 119.69, 116.97, 116.71, 115.82, 108.31, 105.54, 101.22, 101.13. MS ESI-TOF: m/z: M+ Calcd for C34H57N11O14: 843.48; Found: 843.51. Anal. Calcd for C34H57N11O14: C, 48.39; H, 6.81; N, 18.26; Found: C, 48.42; H, 6.83; N, 18.30