Physical Characteristics of Lambs
Lambs born to ewes supplemented with L-citrulline from days 28 to 140 of gestation were heavier (5.5 vs. 4.9 kg ± 0.2; P = 0.05) at birth compared to those born to ewes supplemented with alanine (Table 1). On PND60, lambs born to citrulline treated ewes were 2.3 kg heavier (P < 0.05; Table 1) than alanine controls. Lambs from L-citrulline treated ewes also tended to exhibit an increased (P = 0.08) crown-rump length compared to alanine controls (Table 2). Among groups, male lambs from L-citrulline treated ewes exhibited the largest sternal circumference, exceeding (P = 0.02) that of females from the same treatment group and both sexes from the alanine group (data not shown).
Table 1 Effects of maternal citrulline supplementation on fetal and postnatal growth rate
|
|
Alaninea (n=6f,4m)b
|
Citrullinea (n=4f,9m)b
|
P-value
|
|
Birth Weight (kg)
|
4.9 ± 0.2
|
5.5 ± 0.2
|
0.05
|
|
Weaning Weight-PND60c (kg)
|
17.1 ± 0.8
|
19.4 ± 0.7
|
0.04
|
aValues are presented as means ± SE.
bSex: f, female and m, male.
cPND60: postnatal day 60.
Table 2 Effects of maternal citrulline supplementation on lamb physical parameters and tissue/organ weights on PND60
|
|
Alaninea (n=6f,4m)b
|
Citrullinea (n=4f,9m)b
|
P-value
|
|
Brain (g)
|
83.2 ± 2.1
|
88.9 ± 1.7
|
< 0.05
|
|
Pituitary (g)
|
0.295 ± 0.136
|
0.305 ± 0.011
|
0.57
|
|
Thymus (g)
|
22.5 ± 2.5
|
25.9 ± 2.1
|
0.30
|
|
Right Ventricle (g)
|
20.4 ± 0.8
|
21.4 ± 0.7
|
0.35
|
|
Septum (g)
|
19.3 ± 1.2
|
19.7 ± 1.0
|
0.79
|
|
Lungs (g)
|
255 ± 9
|
263 ± 8
|
0.54
|
|
Adrenals (g)
|
1.40 ± 0.06
|
1.48 ± 0.05
|
0.30
|
|
Kidneys (g)
|
70.3 ± 4.0
|
73.1 ± 3.3
|
0.61
|
|
Liver (g)
|
244 ± 8
|
274 ± 7
|
0.01
|
|
Pancreas (g)
|
12.6 ± 1.2
|
18.6 ± 1.0
|
<0.01
|
|
Spleen (g)
|
66.0 ± 6.3
|
69.3 ± 5.2
|
0.69
|
|
Rumen (g)
|
155 ± 14
|
186 ± 12
|
0.11
|
|
Abomasum (g)
|
68.7 ± 4.3
|
70.1 ± 3.6
|
0.81
|
|
Small Intestine (g)
|
455 ± 28
|
538 ± 23
|
0.03
|
|
Omentum (g)
|
107 ± 17
|
127 ± 14
|
0.39
|
|
Kidney & Pelvic Adipose Tissue (g)
|
187 ± 31
|
186 ± 25
|
1.00
|
|
Gastrocnemius Muscle (g)
|
49.1 ± 2.4
|
55.3 ± 2.0
|
0.06
|
|
Longissimus Dorsi Muscle (g)
|
222 ± 12
|
252 ± 10
|
0.06
|
|
Testes (g)
|
8.3 ± 1.4
|
10.9 ± 0.8
|
0.15
|
|
Ovaries (g)
|
1.6 ± 0.2
|
1.7 ± 0.3
|
0.92
|
|
Crown Rump Length (cm)
|
82.1 ± 1.8
|
86.2 ± 1.3
|
0.08
|
|
Front Leg Length (cm)
|
14.7 ± 0.4
|
14.8 ± 0.4
|
0.88
|
aValues are presented as means ± SE.
bSex: f, female and m, male.
Lamb Organ and Tissue Weights
Maternal citrulline supplementation increased (P < 0.05) the weight of several organs in the lamb on PND60, including the brain, liver, pancreas, and small intestine while also tending to increase (P < 0.10) weights of the gastrocnemius and longissimus dorsi muscles (Table 2). Cardiac measurements revealed a treatment by sex interaction, with male lambs from the L-citrulline group having a greater whole heart mass (P = 0.03) and left ventricle mass (P = 0.01) compared to other groups (Table 3). Lambs from citrulline treated ewes had a heavier (P = 0.01) whole hind limb mass than alanine labs (Table 4). Likewise, male lambs from L-citrulline treated ewes exhibited a greater (P < 0.05) whole hind limb mass than L-citrulline treated females (Table 4).
To compare the growth of the individual organ to the lamb’s body weight, the relative mass was calculated (g organ/kg bodyweight). Pancreatic mass was disproportionately greater (P < 0.05) in lambs from citrulline treated ewes compared to controls (Table 4). Across both treatment groups, male lambs had increased soleus muscle mass relative to body weight compared to females (P < 0.05; data not shown).
Table 3 Effects of maternal citrulline supplementation on lamb physical parameters and tissue/organ weights with treatment and sex interactions on PND60
|
|
|
|
P-values
|
|
|
Sex
|
Alaninea (n=6f, 3m)b
|
Citrullinea (n=4f, 9m)b
|
Trt
|
Sex
|
Trt*Sex
|
|
Sternal Circumference (cm)
|
F
|
60.0 ± 1.8
|
59.6 ± 1.4
|
0.03
|
0.69
|
0.02
|
|
M
|
57.0 ± 1.7
|
63.7 ± 0.9
|
|
Heart (g)
|
F
|
76.8 ± 3.7
|
69.7 ± 4.5
|
0.47
|
0.93
|
0.03
|
|
M
|
66.9 ± 5.2
|
80.3 ± 3.0
|
|
Left Ventricle (g)
|
F
|
34.1 ± 1.6
|
31.9 ± 1.9
|
0.14
|
0.86
|
0.01
|
|
M
|
29.4 ± 2.3
|
37.3 ± 1.3
|
|
Whole Hind Limb (g)
|
F
|
1096 ± 45
|
1142 ± 55
|
0.01
|
0.98
|
<0.05
|
|
M
|
987 ± 64
|
1249 ± 37
|
aValues are presented as means ± SE.
bSex: f, female and m, male.
Table 4 Effects of maternal citrulline supplementation on relative tissue/organ weights (g organ/kg bodyweight) on PND60
|
Organ (g organ/kg body weight)
|
Alaninea (n=6f,4m)b
|
Citrullinea (n=4f,9m)b
|
P-value
|
|
Brain
|
5.0 ± 0.2
|
4.6 ± 0.2
|
0.23
|
|
Pituitary
|
0.017 ± 0.0007
|
0.016 ± 0.0006
|
0.13
|
|
Thymus
|
1.3 ± 0.1
|
1.3 ± 0.1
|
0.99
|
|
Right Ventricle
|
1.22 ± 0.04
|
1.11 ± 0.04
|
0.08
|
|
Septum
|
1.15 ± 0.06
|
1.02 ± 0.05
|
0.08
|
|
Lungs
|
15.3 ± 0.7
|
13.6 ± 0.6
|
0.07
|
|
Adrenals
|
0.083 ± 0.005
|
0.077 ± 0.004
|
0.38
|
|
Kidneys
|
4.2 ± 0.3
|
3.8 ± 0.2
|
0.24
|
|
Liver
|
14.6 ± 0.7
|
14.2 ± 0.6
|
0.73
|
|
Pancreas
|
0.77 ± 0.08
|
0.97 ± 0.07
|
<0.05
|
|
Spleen
|
3.9 ± 0.3
|
3.6 ± 0.3
|
0.52
|
|
Small Intestine
|
27.2 ± 1.8
|
28.0 ± 1.5
|
0.72
|
|
Rumen
|
9.1 ± 0.6
|
9.6 ± 0.5
|
0.57
|
|
Abomasum
|
4.0 ± 0.2
|
3.6 ± 0.2
|
0.18
|
|
Omentum
|
6.2 ± 0.8
|
6.5 ± 0.7
|
0.77
|
|
Kidney & Pelvic Adipose Tissue
|
10.8 ± 1.4
|
9.4 ± 1.2
|
0.47
|
|
Gastrocnemius Muscle
|
2.9 ± 0.10
|
2.9 ± 0.1
|
0.77
|
|
Longissimus Dorsi Muscle
|
13.0 ± 0.3
|
13.0 ± 0.3
|
0.92
|
|
Testes
|
0.54 ± 0.06
|
0.54 ± 0.03
|
0.98
|
|
Ovaries
|
0.09 ± 0.01
|
0.09 ± 0.01
|
0.98
|
aValues are presented as means ± SE.
bSex: f, female and m, male.
Concentrations of Insulin, Glucose, and NEFAs
Prior to suckling, on PND1, lambs from L-citrulline treated ewes had higher (P = 0.05) plasma insulin concentrations compared to lambs from alanine treated ewes (Table 5). No differences (P > 0.1) were observed in glucose or NEFAs concentrations on PND1 (Table 5). By PND60, lambs from the L-citrulline group exhibited a 25% increase (P < 0.05) in plasma glucose concentration compared to alanine controls (Table 6). No differences (P>0.10) were observed in plasma insulin or NEFA concentrations on PND60 between treatments (Table 6).
Table 5 Effects of maternal citrulline supplementation on concentration of insulin, glucose, and NEFAs in lamb plasma at PND1
|
|
Alaninea (n=6f,4m)b
|
Citrullinea (n=4f,9m)b
|
P-value
|
|
Insulin (μg/L)
|
0.095 ± 0.035
|
0.190 ± 0.030
|
0.05
|
|
Glucose (mg/dL)
|
45.6 ± 5.6
|
48.6 ± 4.9
|
0.69
|
|
NEFA (mEq/L)
|
0.32 ± 0.08
|
0.27 ± 0.07
|
0.62
|
aValues are presented as means ± SE.
bSex: f, female and m, male.
Table 6 Effects of maternal citrulline supplementation on concentration of insulin, glucose, and NEFAs in lamb plasma at PND60
|
|
Alaninea (n=6f,4m)b
|
Citrullinea (n=4f,9m)b
|
P-value
|
|
Insulin (μg/L)
|
0.076 ± 0.017
|
0.113 ± 0.015
|
0.13
|
|
Glucose (mg/dL)
|
157 ± 13
|
196 ± 12
|
<0.05
|
|
NEFA (mEq/L)
|
0.95 ± 0.11
|
1.00 ± 0.09
|
0.72
|
aValues are presented as means ± SE.
bSex: f, female and m, male.
Pancreatic Morphometry
Representative immunofluorescence images highlight the exocrine pancreas (stained pink), with clearly delineated exocrine areas (outlined in white), and vasculature (outlined in yellow) (Fig. 1a,b). These images were utilized to calculate percentage areas. Maternal L-citrulline supplementation did not alter the percentage of areas of either the endocrine or exocrine pancreas, while there was a tendency for a decrease (P = 0.09) in vascular area within the pancreas of lambs whose mothers received citrulline (Table 7).We next estimated the mass of the endocrine and exocrine pancreas by multiplying the percentage areas by the mass of the organ and found that mass of both the endocrine and exocrine pancreas was increased (P = 0.03; P < 0.01) in lambs whose mothers received L-citrulline supplementation during gestation (Table 7).
At PND60, α, β, and δ cells types were observed in both L-citrulline and control lamb pancreases (Fig. 2a,b,d,e,g,h). Cells expressing mature endocrine hormones were localized within islets (Fig. 2d,e,g,h). No difference was observed in the percentage area of either glucagon+ or insulin+ cells, although there was a tendency for a decrease (P = 0.07) in δ-cell area (Table 8). Notably, β-cell mass within the endocrine pancreas was greater (P < 0.01) in lambs from L-citrulline treated ewes compared to controls, as was α-cells mass (P < 0.01; Table 8).
Table 7 Effects of maternal citrulline supplementation on pancreatic characteristics
|
|
Alaninea (n=6f,4m)b
|
Citrullinea (n=4f, 9m)b
|
P-value
|
|
Endocrine Pancreas, %
|
6.1 ± 1.0
|
7.7 ± 0.9
|
0.29
|
|
Exocrine Pancreas, %
|
93.8 ± 1.1
|
92.3 ± 1.0
|
0.33
|
|
Vasculature, %
|
0.042 ± 0.003
|
0.035 ± 0.003
|
0.09
|
|
Endocrine Pancreas (g)
|
0.7 ± 0.2
|
1.4 ± 0.2
|
0.03
|
|
Exocrine Pancreas (g)
|
11.5 ± 1.1
|
16.8 ± 1.0
|
<0.01
|
aValues are presented as means ± SE.
bSex: f, female and m, male.
Table 8 Effects of maternal citrulline supplementation on endocrine pancreas morphometry
|
|
Alanine (n=6f,4m)
|
Citrulline (n=4f, 9m)
|
P-value
|
|
Insulin-positive area, %
|
0.68 ± 0.07
|
0.67 ± 0.06
|
0.94
|
|
Glucagon-positive area, %
|
0.22 ± 0.04
|
0.23 ± 0.03
|
0.79
|
|
δ-cell area, %
|
0.05 ± 0.01
|
0.03 ± 0.01
|
0.07
|
|
β-cell mass (g)
|
0.45 ± 0.08
|
0.89 ± 0.08
|
<0.01
|
|
α-cell mass (g)
|
0.14 ± 0.03
|
0.27 ± 0.02
|
<0.01
|
|
δ-cell mass (g)
|
0.04 ± 0.01
|
0.04 ± 0.01
|
0.75
|
aValues are presented as means ± SE.
bSex: f, female and m, male.
Pancreatic Cell Proliferation
Endocrine and exocrine cell proliferation were examined with PCNA, a marker for cell proliferation (Bologna-Molina et al. 2013; Zargar-Shoshtari et al. 2018). Exocrine areas are shown in pink, with endocrine areas outlined in white for better clarification between the two areas, PCNA+ cells are stained green (Fig. 3a,b). L-citrulline supplementation to gestating ewes showed no difference in the percentage of PCNA+ exocrine pancreas cells between treatment groups (0.016 ± 0.003% vs 0.021 ± 0.003%) (Table 9). Furthermore, a tendency for increased (P = 0.07) percentage of PCNA+ endocrine pancreas cells was observed in lambs from L-citrulline treated ewes (0.044 ± 0.014%) when compared to from lambs from control ewes (0.012 ± 0.015%) (Table 9).
Table 9 Effects of maternal citrulline supplementation on pancreatic cell proliferation
|
|
Alaninea (n=6f,4m)b
|
Citrullinea (n=4f, 9m)b
|
P-value
|
|
PCNA-positive cells exocrine pancreas, %
|
0.016 ± 0.003
|
0.021 ± 0.003
|
0.41
|
|
PCNA-positive cells endocrine pancreas, %
|
0.012 ± 0.015
|
0.044 ± 0.014
|
0.07
|
aValues are presented as means ± SE.
bSex: f, female and m, male.