A. muciniphila altered growth performance and alleviated HFD-induced hepatic steatosis
Firstly, we discovered that a dosage of 10^8 cfu/g could significantly reduce the liver TAG content by introducing A. muciniphila at varying concentrations (p < 0.05; Supplementary Figure 1). In addition, we also conducted a comprehensive evaluation considering the effects on growth performance, and thus determined to use this dose in all subsequent experiments. Firstly, the growth performance and feed utilization of zebrafish were evaluated (Supplementary Table 3). HFD significantly reduced the survival rate (SR) of zebrafish compared to LFD (p < 0.05), while the A. muciniphila supplementation reduced the mortality induced by HFD. Compared with LFD, HFD showed a showed a trend of an increased of weight gain rate (WGR, p = 0.06), while the Amuc group did not. Similarly, HFD had a significant tendency towards increasing specific growth rate (SGR) of zebrafish (p = 0.09), while the addition of Amuc had no effect on SGR. These data show A. muciniphila administration improves zebrafish survival without affecting growth or feed conversion.
We further investigated the effect of A. muciniphila addition on HFD-induced lipid metabolism disorders and liver injury. This experiment found that HFD significantly increased the liver fat accumulation of zebrafish, and there was a distinct tendency to reduce liver fat accumulation due to the supplementation of A. muciniphila (p = 0.08; Figure 1A). While there was no significant effect on muscle TAG content (Figure 1B). A. muciniphila could significantly reduce the content of T-CHO in liver of zebrafish (p < 0.05; Figure 1C). HFD significantly increased oxidative stress of zebrafish liver manifested as higher level of MDA, and the addition of A. muciniphila can effectively reverse the negative effects (p < 0.01, p < 0.05; Figure 1D). Liver H&E staining confirmed A. muciniphila's role in improving hepatic steatosis, as its supplementation notably reduced HFD-induced liver fat droplet accumulation and enlargement (Figure 1E).
To further investigate how A. muciniphila regulates hepatic lipid metabolism, mRNA expression of lipolysis- and lipogenesis-related genes was assessed. Consistently, A. muciniphila significantly downregulated peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) (p < 0.05), CCAAT enhancer binding proteins (C/EBPα) (p < 0.01), fatty acid synthetase (FAS) (p < 0.05), Diacylglycerol-O-Acyltransferase Homolog 2 (DGAT2) (p < 0.05), and upregulate the expression of uncoupling protein 2 (UCP2) (p = 0.06; Figure 1F). However, it had no significant effect on acetyl-CoA carboxylase1 (ACC1, p = 0.08) or peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα, p = 0.09). HFD impairs hepatic antioxidant capacity, which is manifested by a significant compensatory increase in T-AOC (p < 0.05, Figure 1G). Supplementation with A. muciniphila can weaken this effect, accompanied by an enhancement in SOD activity (p < 0.05, Figure1H). The addition of A. muciniphila can effectively restore HFD-induced liver injury, manifested by a significant decrease in serum ALT and AST levels (p < 0.05, p < 0.01; Figure 1I, J). The above results indicate that A. muciniphila could improve HFD-induced hepatic steatosis via inhibiting lipid synthesis and promoting lipolysis by regulating key genes. Moreover, it can boost antioxidant capacity while alleviating liver oxidative stress and damage.
A. muciniphila mitigates HFD-induced gut injury and improves barrier function
Acidic mucin secreted by goblet cells is stained blue by AB-PAS stain. Supplementation with A. muciniphila significantly reversed the HFD-induced reduction in goblet cells (Figure 2A). HFD induced intestinal chronic inflammation, as zebrafish on HFD showed upregulated intestinal pro-inflammatory factors TNFα and IL-1β compared with LFD. A. muciniphila supplementation downregulated IL-1β versus HFD (p < 0.05; Figure 2C). The expression of anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-10 and TGFβ was increased (p = 0.07, p < 0.05; Figure 2D, E). Consuming high levels of fat induces endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress of intestines, which further activates apoptosis in fish (Ling et al., 2019). As shown in Figure 2F, oral administration of A. muciniphila significantly down-regulated pro-apoptotic genes bid and bax, up-regulated anti-apoptotic gene bcl-2, and increased the bcl-2/bax ratio. (p < 0.05; Figure 2F). The activities of caspase3 and caspase9 further confirmed that it alleviated intestinal cell apoptosis in HFD-fed zebrafish (p < 0.001, p < 0.05; Figure 2G, H).
HFD leads to a compromised intestinal barrier and increased serum endotoxin levels. Oral administration of A. muciniphila evidently decreased serum endotoxin levels (p = 0.06, Figure 3B). Meanwhile, the it could improve the damage to the intestinal morphological structure (Figure 3A). qRT-PCR showed that A. muciniphila upregulated intestinal barrier-related genes, including Hif-1α, muc2, Tjp-1α, claudin1, occludin (p < 0.05, Figure 3E). Intestinal antimicrobial peptides play an important role in intestinal barrier function. The expression of intestinal defb11 was significantly down-regulated by HFD, and the addition of A. muciniphila could significantly reverse it (p < 0.05, Figure 3F). But there was no discernible difference in the expression of lysozyme and hepcidin in both the HFD and Amuc groups (Figure 3G, H). Moreover, A. muciniphila has the ability to greatly increase DAO enzyme activity and improve the antioxidant capacity in the intestine (p < 0.05, Figure 3C, D).
A. muciniphila alleviates metabolic disorders partially depending on gut microbiota
To determine whether gut microbiota supports the probiotic effect of A. muciniphila-induced metabolic phenotype, we performed a 4-week broad-spectrum antibiotics cocktail treatment on zebrafish. The impact of A. muciniphila in lowering HFD-induced weight gain was eliminated following a 4-week intervention (Figure 4A). Specifically, its effect in alleviating and excessive fat deposition of liver and intestine was also eliminated (Figure 4B, C). And the liver H&E section showed no change in the alleviation of steatosis after antibiotic intervention (Figure 4E). At the same time, we also found that A. muciniphila cannot effectively reverse the intestinal damage caused by HFD after co-administration of antibiotics (Figure 4D). This indicates that the metabolic regulation of A. muciniphila is affected after depletion of the gut microbiota.
A. muciniphila application regulated HFD-induced gut microbiota community dysbiosis, elevated the tryptophan metabolizing-related genus
A. muciniphila colonizes the intestinal mucus layer, digesting mucus to interact with symbiotic microbiota via trophic relationships. It enhances microbial gene richness and ecosystem abundance, and its gut crosstalk may improve obesity-related metabolism (Ling et al., 2019). Intestinal community composition was analyzed via 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing, yielding 1,430,214 optimized sequences clustered into 2,655 OTUs. Ace and Chao index showed that microbial richness had an obvious increase, while Shannon index was significantly reduced in the Amuc group (Figure 5A, Supplementary Table 4). Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) showed that the intestine microbiota structure of LFD and HFD had relatively high similarity, while there is obvious shifts from the Amuc group (Figure 5D). The above results suggested that the administration of A. muciniphila may exert a strong regulating effect on the intestinal microbial community. We next analyzed the composition of intestinal microbial community in different groups. At the phylum level, the types of core microbiota were identical in different dietary groups, including Pseudomonadota, Actinobacteriota, Bacillota, Verrucomicrobiota, Bacteroidota (Figure 5B, Supplementary Table 5). In contrast to the HFD group, the Amuc group exhibited a significant reduction in the relative abundance of Pseudomonadota (41.1% vs. 58.6%). Conversely, the relative abundance of Bacillota was markedly higher in the Amuc group (29%) than in the HFD group (9.72%). There were no obvious changes in Bacteroidota among the three dietary groups. PICRUSt2 combined with the KEGG prediction found that the addition of A. muciniphila increased the relative abundance bacteria related to Biosynthesis of Secondary Metabolites (ko01110, p < 0.01) and acetate synthesis (ko02020) (Figure 5E). Further exploration found that the number of ASV related to tryptophan metabolism had a obvious increase in the Amuc group compared to the HFD group (p = 0.06, Figure 5F). Analysis at the genus level found that A. muciniphila increased the relative abundance of Staphylococcus (p < 0.01), Vibrionaceae (p = 0.2), unclassified_f_Vibrionaceae (p = 0.2) and significantly downregulated the relative abundance of Acinetobacter, Perlucidica, Massilia, Acidovoorax and Bradyrizobium (p < 0.01, p < 0.05; Figure 5C, Supplementary Table 6).
A. muciniphila altered the gut metabolite profile and pathways
The gut microbiota affects the metabolites. Therefore, the changes of zebrafish gut metabolites after A. muciniphila intervention were investigated by untargeted transcriptomics. We identified a total of 4345 metabolites, which were parameterized (p < 0.05, VIP 1.0 and fold change (FC) > 1,) to construct a differential metabolite dataset. The volcano plot showed that HFD had elevated 486 and reduced 162 metabolites when compared to LFD, while the addition of A. muciniphila upregulated 180 and downregulated 308 metabolites when compared to the HFD group (Figure 6A, B). This indicates that A. muciniphila administration could significantly alter the gut metabolic profile. Further two-component PLS-DA models comprehensively showed the metabolome profiles evidently discriminated among the three dietary groups (Figure 6E). More specifically, the first two components account for 29.1% of the total variation, with the first component explaining 17.1% and the second 12%, respectively. Hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) was performed for the top 30 differential metabolites (Figure 6C). HCA presented two main clusters, LFD and HFD samples, Amuc and LFD samples clustered separately in a sub-cluster. This indicated the differences in accumulated metabolites as a result of the addition of A. muciniphila. The key metabolic pathways caused by different diets were further enriched through KEGG enrichment pathway analysis. As depicted in Figure 6D, the top 15 metabolic pathways with the highest enrichment were selected from the KEGG database in Amuc group versus HFD group. Among the enriched KEGG pathways, Lipid metabolism (Primary bile acid biosynthesis, Steroid hormone biosynthesis, Linolenic acid metabolism, alpha-Linolenic acid metabolism, Glycerophospholipid metabolism), Endocrine system (Insulin/GnRH signaling pathway), Signal transduction (Apelin/Hedgehog/MAPK signaling pathway), and Gap junction, Ferroptosis pathway were significantly enriched (p < 0.05). Furthermore, in the Amuc group, the overall expression of the pathways of Primary bile acid biosynthesis and Insulin signaling pathway tended to be upregulated, while the overall expression of the pathways related to lipid synthesis, such as Linolenic Acid/alpha-Linolenic acid/Glycerophospholipid metabolism, tended to be downregulated.
A. muciniphila shifted tryptophan regulation, activating the AhR
A. muciniphila modulates the community structure of the gut microbiota. It has been demonstrated that three gut microbiota metabolites, including secondary bile acids metabolism, SCFA metabolism, and tryptophan are crucial to the host's physiological metabolism (Nicolas et al., 2019). Given that HFD can induce drastic changes in tryptophan metabolism, we conducted a study to investigate whether the administration of A. muciniphila has an impact on the pathways associated with the tryptophan-related differential metabolites (Figure 7). Three main metabolic processes catabolized tryptophan when it enters the gastrointestinal tract: the host kynurenine and serotonin pathway, and the gut microbial system which directly converts tryptophan into its distinct metabolites, indole and IDs (Agus et al., 2018). Tryptophan metabolites were therefore examined both before and after the administration of A. muciniphila. We found the metabolites of the AhR pathway, which represents the microbial metabolism of tryptophan, have increased, including indole (p < 0.05), indole-3-acetaldehyde (IAAId) (p < 0.05), 5-hydroxylindoleacetylglycin (p < 0.05), ILA (p < 0.05), while indoleacetaldehyde and indolepyruvate had no notable alteration. The metabolites in KP such as kynurenic acid and 5-hydroxykynurenine showed no discernible differences, while quinic acid (p = 0.056) exhibits a considerable downward trend. Serotonin levels significantly decreased although the 5-hydroxy-L-tryptophan in serotonin pathway remained unchanged. Consistently, the Amuc group showed a marked reduction in the expression of key enzymes in the KP and 5-HT pathways compared to the HFD group, including IDO1 (p < 0.05), TDO2a (p < 0.05), Kynu (p = 0.067), and TPH1 (p = 0.074) (Figure 7). In summary, the intake of A. muciniphila inhibited several key enzymes in the KP and 5-HT pathway, consequently driving the tryptophan metabolic pathway towards a microbiota-dependent direction.
Metabolomics studies confirmed that mucin phage significantly altered tryptophan metabolites. These metabolites, in turn, activate AhR, which plays a role in maintaining intestinal homeostasis and regulating metabolism (Yano et al., 2015). To determine its effect on intestinal AhR signaling, we first conducted detection using qRT-PCR. It is as expected that A. muciniphila can successfully counteract the HFD-induced decrease of AhR1 and AhR2 at the mRNA level (p = 0.06, p < 0.05; Figure 8A, B). To clarify AhR's effect on downstream targets, we detected IL-17 and IL-22 expression (Figure 8D, E). HFD tended to reduce IL-17 (p = 0.06) and IL-22 (p = 0.32) levels, while A. muciniphila addition significantly increased IL-22 levels (p < 0.05). AhR plausibly contributes to the interaction between metabolism and the proinflammatory state during the onset of obesity and in T2D patients (Carcia-Villatoro et al., 2017). Moreover, IL-22 maintains intestinal integrity and barrier functions, and is linked to insulin resistance in obesity. Therefore, A. muciniphila alleviates HFD-induced intestinal inflammation and barrier by activating AhR and downstream target gene IL-22.
Correlation analysis among intestinal microbiota and metabolites
Subsequently, Figure 9 provides a clear representation of the outcomes derived from the pathway analysis. We discovered that the treatment with A. muciniphila enhanced the gut microbiota's capacity to metabolize tryptophan. This enhancement potentially led to the generation of higher levels of 5-hydroxyindole acetic acid (5-HIAA), ILA, IAAId and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA). Consequently, the A. muciniphila intervention potentially augmented the metabolism of tryptophan along the serotonin pathway (5-HT) and the AhR pathway. In line with the latest and most comprehensive literature accounts, the tryptophan metabolites elevated through these two metabolic pathways are intrinsically dependent on the gut microbiota (Zhang et al., 2024; Du et al., 2024). Therefore, A. muciniphila's activation of AhR and its target gene depends on its regulation of gut microbiota-mediated tryptophan metabolism.
For a more profound exploration of the microorganisms involved in the regulatory effect of A. muciniphila on tryptophan metabolism, Spearman analysis was employed to establish the connection between the altered bacteria and tryptophan-related differential metabolites. As depicted in Figure 10,
treatment with A. muciniphila up-regulated indole, indolepyruvate, IAAId, and 5-HIAA, which positively correlated with Plesiomonas, Vibrio, unclassified_f_Vibrionaceae, and Staphylococcus. Specifically, relative abundances of these bacterial taxa were elevated in the Amuc group compared to HFD group (p = 0.1; p < 0.05; p < 0.05; p < 0.01). Nevertheless, quinic acid and kynurenic acid, which are products of the host's tryptophan metabolic pathway, either had no association or a negative correlation with these bacteria. In contrast, they showed a positive correlation with chloroplasts. Furthermore, a negative correlation was detected between ILA and both Bradyrhizobium and Massilia. Remarkably, the relative abundances of these two bacterial taxa were substantially reduced in the Amuc group (p < 0.01; p < 0.05). In contrast, serotonin levels were down-regulated in the Amuc group. This neurotransmitter displayed a significant positive correlation with Massilia, Bradyrhizobium, Acinetobacter, Perlucidibaca, and Sphingobium. Significantly, the Amuc group demonstrated considerably reduced relative abundances of these bacterial taxa in comparison to the HFD group (p < 0.05). In summary, A. muciniphila may promote the abundance of Plesiomonas, Vibrio, unclassified_f_Vibrionaceae, and Staphylococcus while reducing that of Bradyrhizobium, Massilia, thereby regulating tryptophan metabolism.