Study design
A cross-sectional study design was conducted among sexually active adolescents and young adults in Soroti City, Uganda in January 2025.
Study setting. The study was conducted in four health facilities that were purposively selected because they provide PrEP services to all at-risk populations in the city, and these include: Princess Diana Health Center IV, Kichinjaji Health Center III, Eastern Division Health Center III, and Western Division Health Center III. These are lower-level health facilities in the city providing comprehensive HIV prevention and treatment services to adolescents and young people. The facilities have adolescent and youth friendly services and so make it easy for young people to access PrEP when they visit the sites. Soroti city is in the Teso sub-region of Northeastern Uganda, 310km from and Northeast of the Uganda’s capital Kampala. Soroti city has a population of 133,774 persons, with 33,659 households and an average size of 3.9 persons per household [9]. The Major economic activity is a business hub of the Teso sub-region, in addition to agriculture, agro-processing and trade.[10].
Study population.
This study involved sexually active adolescents and young adults aged 18–24 years who attended adolescent and youth-friendly services at the selected health facilities in Soroti City at the time of study. These are young people, mostly out of school and living in a city with high HIV transmission rates.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Inclusion criteria. All sexually active adolescents and young adults aged 18 to 24 years with self-report of testing HIV negative within the previous 6 months, residents of Soroti City at the time of study who attended adolescent and youth-friendly services at the selected health facilities.
Exclusion criteria. Adolescents and young adults aged 18 to 24 years who were critically or mentally ill were excluded from the study.
Sampling procedure. Purposive sampling was done to select the 4 health facilities that provide adolescent and youth-friendly services, including PrEP, to the eligible PrEP candidates. The 421 study participants who had come to receive healthcare services from study sites were selected using a consecutive sampling approach till a predetermined sample size based on the population served was reached per site.
Data collection procedure. The data was collected through guided face to face interviews using semi-structured questionnaires in a simple private room by the trained research assistants (RAs).
Study variables.
Dependent variables.
The Primary outcome was PrEP utilization measured as the proportion of participants who have ever used PrEP for HIV prevention.
Independent variables included sociodemographic variables such as age, gender and education. Sociocultural factors included stigma, religious beliefs, and peer influence. Health system-related factors assessed included the accessibility and availability of PrEP services.
Data management analysis.
The data collected were entered into EpiData version 4.6, cleaned for missing data, duplicates, and unsound entries. The data was then exported to Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 27 for further analysis. Numerical data were summarized using mean and standard deviations for Continuous variables and into frequencies, percentages, and proportions for categorical variables. We then conducted a bivariate analysis using a binary Logistic regression Results were reported as adjusted odds ratios with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.