3.1 Time dependence of adsorption uptake
Figure 1 depicts the time-dependence of the adsorption uptake of individual hydrocarbons on ZIF-8 at 303 K, illustrating the relationship between the amount of adsorption and the square root of the adsorption time. Initially, all the vapor species exhibited a linear increase in the adsorption amount, which was proportional to the square root of time, suggesting that micropore diffusion was the primary mechanism governing the adsorption of individual solvent vapors on ZIF-8. These observations can be characterized using the Fickian diffusion model, which is applicable to spherical particles [40]. Assuming that the concentration of adsorbed molecules at the center of the particle is negligible (i.e., in the short diffusion time region), the model can be approximated as
$$\:m\left(t\right)={m}_{\text{e}\text{x}\text{t}}+{m}_{\infty\:}\frac{6}{\sqrt{\pi\:}}\sqrt{\frac{{D}_{\text{f},\text{i}\text{n}\text{i}}t}{{r}_{\text{a}\text{v}\text{e}}^{2}}}$$
1
where Df,ini denotes the Fickian diffusion coefficient, which is derived from the initial slope of the time-dependent adsorption curve; rave represents the average radius of the spherical particles; m∞ indicates the saturation adsorption amount; and mext refers to the adsorption amount present on the surface of the particle [41]. The diffusion coefficient Df,ini can be calculated from the slope of the linear portion depicted in Fig. 1, assuming that the saturation adsorption amount is known. The data indicated that BZ and 1,4-CHD achieved saturation during adsorption, whereas 1,3-CHD approached saturation. In contrast, the CHEN and CHEX did not reach saturation during this period. For convenience, the adsorption quantity recorded at the longest adsorption time was designated as the saturation adsorption quantity, m∞, at equilibrium. The Df,ini values for each adsorbed molecule were extracted from the linear segments, as shown in Fig. 1. Figure S6 (SI) presents the time-dependent adsorption amounts at 313 and 323 K. Table 1 summarizes the Df,ini values obtained at 303, 313, and 323 K. Notably, despite being structural isomers with identical molecular weights, 1,3-CHD and 1,4-CHD exhibited distinct diffusion coefficients. This finding suggests that ZIF-8 can differentiate between structural isomers based on their respective adsorption behavior through kinetic mechanisms. This observation is particularly significant, as it implies that ZIF-8 can potentially serve as a molecular sieve for structural isomers—an ability with important implications for separation applications.
Table 1
Diffusion coefficients of adsorbate molecule determined from the initial slope of adsorption uptake curve
Adsorbate | Df,ini / m2 s− 1 |
|---|
| | 303 K | 313 K | 323 K |
BZ | 1.3 (1) × 10‒19 | 2.2 (1) × 10‒19 | 2.8 (1) × 10‒19 |
1,4-CHD | 5.6 (1) × 10‒20 | 7.9 (1) × 10‒20 | 9.5 (1) × 10‒20 |
1,3-CHD | 3.2 (1) × 10‒20 | 3.5 (1) × 10‒20 | 5.4 (1) × 10‒20 |
CHEN | 1.2 (1) × 10‒20 | 1.8 (1) × 10‒20 | 2.2 (1) × 10‒20 |
CHEX (chair) | 8.2 (1) × 10‒21 | 1.1 (1) × 10‒20 | 1.7 (1) × 10‒20 |
The member in parentheses presents the experimental error.
When larger molecules are adsorbed onto ZIF-8, they must navigate through the 6MR aperture, which consists of six zinc (Zn) atoms and 2-methylimidazole bridging ligands. A previous study established that, for benzene and its derivatives adsorbed on ZIF-8 [30], traversal through the 6MR aperture represents the rate-limiting step in the diffusion process. Furthermore, the movement of bulky molecules through the 6MR aperture is primarily governed by configurational diffusion, which is characterized by a restricted molecular orientation and rotation. Consequently, the temperature dependence of Df,ini should be assessed using the following equation derived from Eyring's transition state theory [42] rather than the traditional Arrhenius equation:
$$\:{D}_{\text{f},\text{i}\text{n}\text{i}}=\text{e}{\lambda\:}^{2}\frac{kT}{h}{\text{e}}^{\varDelta\:{S}^{\ddagger}/R}{\text{e}}^{{-E}_{a}/RT}$$
2
where Ea signifies the diffusion activation energy, ΔS‡ represents the diffusion activation entropy, h denotes Planck's constant, k is Boltzmann's constant, and λ indicates the distance between the molecular jumps. During the diffusion process, molecules jump between adjacent lattices via 6MR apertures with λ = 31/2a/2. The lattice constant a is 1.701 nm at 298 K [22], resulting in a λ of 1.473 nm.
Figure 2 illustrates a logarithmic representation of Df,iniꞏT ‒1 versus the reciprocal temperature (Eyring plot). The slope and intercept of the graph correspond to the activation energy and entropy, respectively. The activation parameters for each adsorbed molecule are listed in Table 2.
Table 2
Diffusion coefficients at 303 K and activation parameters determined from the temperature dependence of the diffusion coefficients.
Adsorbate | σaverage /nm | Ea / kJ mol− 1 | ΔS‡/ J K− 1 mol− 1 |
|---|
BZ | 0.525 | 28 (2) | ‒172 (5) |
1,4-CHD | 0.537 | 19 (2) | ‒208 (10) |
1,3-CHD | 0.538 | 18 (2) | ‒217 (10) |
CHEN | 0.548 | 24 (2) | ‒205 (6) |
CHEX (chair) | 0.558 | 27 (1) | ‒200 (3) |
| ‒ |
Figure 3 presents the molecular size dependence of Df,ini at 303 K and the activation parameters Ea and ‒ΔS‡ for individual hydrocarbons. The semi-logarithmic plot of Df,ini shows a linear decrease with increasing molecular size, whereas the standard plots of Ea and ‒ΔS‡ exhibited a V-shaped dependence on the molecular size. Specifically, Ea reached its minimum for 1,4-CHD and 1,3-CHD, which possessed intermediate molecular sizes, and attained its maximum values for BZ and CHEX, representing the smallest and largest molecular sizes, respectively. This observation suggests that the passage of adsorbed molecules through 6MR aperture is governed by the combination of molecular size and specific host-guest interactions at the 6MR aperture site. The activation energy Ea can be lowered by stabilizing the transition state or raised by stabilizing the adsorbed molecules within the pores. A lower Ea enhances the likelihood of adsorbed molecules overcoming the diffusion energy barrier at a specific temperature. Conversely, ΔS‡ exerts an opposing influence on Df,ini. The substantial negative activation entropy indicates a pronounced restriction on the degrees of freedom of the adsorbed molecule within the diffusion transition state, which leads to a reduced diffusion frequency. In BZ, the effect of ΔS‡—despite having the smallest absolute value—surpasses that of the largest Ea, resulting in the highest Df,ini value among the compounds. For 1,4-CHD and 1,3-CHD, the Ea values are less than 20 kJ mol‒1; however, their ΔS‡ values reach up to ca. 210 J K‒1 mol‒1. The competing effects of these opposing factors may result in the contribution of activation entropy surpassing that of activation energy, thereby causing a decline in Df,ini as the molecular size increases. In BZ, 1,4-CHD, and 1,3-CHD, Ea and ΔS‡ exhibited a trade-off relationship. In contrast, for CHEN and CHEX, both the high Ea values and the relatively large absolute values of ΔS‡ decrease the Df,ini values. In the following sections, we examine the pronounced effects of molecular orientation on the diffusion of adsorbed molecules through the 6MR and identify the specific intermolecular interactions that significantly influence the Ea.
3.2 Monte Carlo simulation for 6MR passage of adsorbate molecules
Monte Carlo simulations were employed to elucidate the potential energy profile and molecular orientation of the adsorbed molecules as they traverse the 6MR aperture. In this context, the 6MR aperture, characterized by a tilted angle (Δθ = 0) as derived from the crystal structure, presents an activation energy required for molecular passage with activation energies ranging from several hundred to several thousand kJ mol‒1. Consequently, it is nearly impossible for molecules to pass through the aperture using only the thermal energy available at room temperature. This observation implies that the 6MR aperture must undergo enlargement to facilitate the passage of target molecules. To quantify this, we evaluated the activation energy required for molecular passage as a function of the tilted angle of the bridging ligand by systematically varying this angle. By employing polynomial interpolation on the acquired data, we identified a tilted angle that aligned with the experimentally measured values. Figure 4 illustrates the energy profile associated with passage through the 6MR aperture, corresponding to the experimental activation energy for each adsorbate, as determined by the time dependence of the adsorption uptake. Two minima were observed on either side of the 6MR aperture. The energy minimum at the CH3 neck (Z/Å ~ − 2) was deeper than that at the CH neck (Z/Å ~ +3). This finding suggests that the passage of molecules trapped in the CH3 neck through the 6MR aperture is energetically unfavorable. Consequently, the passage of molecules through the 6MR aperture is only considered when they approach from the CH neck side [30]. In this case, the energy barrier encountered by an adsorbed molecule navigating through the 6MR aperture is defined as the difference (ΔE = ECH,max − ECH,min) between the maximum energy (ECH,max) located near the CH neck (+ 0.5 ≤ Z/Å ≤ +1) and the minimum energy (ECH,min) at the CH neck (Z/Å ~ +3). Notably, in the case of CHEX, an additional energy maximum was detected on the outside of the CH neck (Z/Å ~ +2). The presence of the dual maxima in the energy profile aligns with the findings from previous studies. This behavior supports the use of a model that incorporates pre-equilibrium adsorption at the CH neck, represented as: A(g) + M(s) ⇌ AM*(s) ⇌ AM(s) [30]. In this model, the apparent activation energy can be expressed as ΔE = Ea,a – Ea,d + Ea,in, where Ea,a denotes the energy barrier for pre-adsorption at the 6MR aperture, Ea,d is the energy barrier for the desorption of the pre-adsorbed molecule, and Ea,in is the energy barrier for passage through the CH neck. The activation energy evaluated by MC simulation, the resulting tilted angle of the bridging ligand, and the aperture opening diameter are listed in Table 3. The correlation between the tilted angle and the opening diameter of the 6MR aperture, which reproduces the experimental values, appears to align more closely with MIN-1 than with MIN-2, as proposed by Webster et al. [43] (see Scheme S1 and Table S1 in the SI). This suggests that the energy barrier for the passage of the adsorbed molecule through the 6MR aperture is significantly influenced by the cross-sectional area of the adsorbed molecule, indicating that the molecular orientation is highly constrained during this process. This conclusion was consistent with the findings of our previous study.
Table 3
Experimental and simulated activation energies of adsorbed molecules passing through the 6MR aperture, tilted angles of the bridging ligand, and average diameters of the 6MR aperture.
Adsorbate | ΔE / kJ mol− 1 | Δθc / deg. | dp,ave / nm | MIN-1b)/nm | MIN-2 b)/nm |
|---|
BZ | 27.6 | 17.0 | 0.47 | 0.3277 | 0.6628 |
1,4-CHD | 19.3 | 21.1 | 0.49 | 0.3845 | 0.6612 |
1,3-CHD | 17.5 | 19.9 | 0.49 | 0.3845 | 0.6612 |
CHEN | 24.2 | 20.55 | 0.49 | 0.4414 | 0.6595 |
CHEX (chair) | 27.0 a) | 24.05 | 0.52 | 0.4982 | 0.6580 |
a. This value corresponds to the apparent activation energy when adsorption pre-equilibration occurs: ΔE = Ea,a – Ea,d + Ea,in.
b. Critical dimensions of adsorbate molecule for entry into zeolite pores. In the slit-shaped pores, the size of the adsorption in the minimum dimension, MIN-1, was determined. In the cylindrical pores, the size of the molecule in two directions is considered: the minimum dimension, MIN-1, and the next smallest dimension, MIN-2.
To further analyze the orientation of the adsorbed molecules, we defined two order parameters:
\(\:{S}_{\perp\:}=\frac{1}{2}\left(3⟨{\text{cos}}^{2}\alpha\:⟩-1\right)\) | (3a) |
|---|
\(\:{S}_{\parallel\:}=\frac{1}{2}\left(3⟨{\text{cos}}^{2}\beta\:⟩-1\right)\) | (3b) |
where α and β defined the angles formed by the vectors perpendicular and parallel to the molecular plane, respectively, with respect to the perpendiculars passing through the center of the 6MR aperture. The characterization of these vectors and their orientation within the reference coordinate system are shown in Figure S7 (see SI). Figure 5 presents the order parameter for each molecule as it traverses the 6MR aperture. An animation depicting the molecular passage through the 6MR is provided in the SI. When the molecular orientation is isotropically distributed, the order parameter is zero. However, as each molecule passed through the aperture, both S⊥ and S|| deviated from zero, indicating that the orientation of the molecules was constrained by the aperture. Notably, the negative value of S⊥ suggests that the molecules navigate the aperture in an orientation in which the molecular plane is nearly perpendicular to the aperture plane. This behavior was exhibited by all the adsorbate molecules. This indicated that the passage of adsorbed molecules through the 6MR aperture was accompanied by significant orientational constraints. In other words, the translational and rotational degrees of freedom of the adsorbed molecules were considerably restricted during their traversal through the 6MR aperture. Consequently, the observed significant negative activation entropy can be attributed to the transition of molecules in the vapor to a diffusion transition state, in which the molecular orientation is markedly constrained at the 6MR aperture.
Conversely, S|| represents the variation in the rotational orientation of the molecules around an axis perpendicular to the molecular plane and exhibited different behaviors for each adsorbate molecule in the range − 3 ≤ Z/Å ≤ +3. For BZ, 1,4-CHD, CHEN, and CHEX, the values ranged from − 0.5 < S|| < +0.5, whereas for 1,3-CHD, 0 < S|| < +1. In BZ and 1,4-CHD, S|| exhibited a bipolar change centered at Z = 0, indicating that the molecule turned its orientation around an axis perpendicular to the molecular plane and then turned it back. In the CHEN and CHEX, the variation in S|| showed a similar trend, although the range of the Z-axis was narrow. This feature implies that these molecules undergo twisting and wiggling around the axis perpendicular to the molecular plane when traversing the 6MR aperture (see the animation provided in the SI). In contrast, for 1,3-CHD, S|| varied continuously from 0 to + 1 during the passage through 6MR, suggesting that the molecular orientation around the perpendicular axis changes progressively throughout the diffusion process. That is, the 1,3-CHD molecule rotates around the axis as it moves through the aperture (see the animation in the SI). This rotation is believed to minimize steric hindrance within the 6MR aperture by reducing friction between the molecule and the framework. This behavior differs from that of other molecules and may partly explain why 1,3-CHD exhibits a lower activation energy for diffusion than the other molecules. Distinguishing between 1,3-CHD and 1,4-CHD is crucial for understanding the factors influencing the diffusion coefficient of ZIF-8. The differences in the Ea and S|| behaviors observed in the MC simulations between 1,3-CHD and 1,4-CHD may reflect the slight differences in the molecular cross-sections and arrangement of π bonds within the molecules.
3.3 Analysis of adsorbate-adsorbent interactions by spectroscopies
3.3.1 FT-IR spectroscopy
Figure 6 displays the symmetric C–H stretching bands associated with the 2-methylimidazole group. The full wavenumber regions of the infrared spectra are shown in Figure S8 (SI). Notably, no shift was observed in the band upon cyclohexane adsorption, while a pronounced redshift was observed over the wavenumber range of 1–2 cm‒1 upon benzene and cyclic alkene adsorption. This shift was more pronounced for 1,3-CHD, 1,4-CHD, and BZ than for CHEN. This observation suggests the elongation of C–H bond, which is attributed to the attractive interaction between the π-electrons of the adsorbed molecules and the C–H bond of 2-methylimidazole [31]. One plausible attractive interaction is the CH-π interaction, which has been reported for various organic compounds, metal complexes, and molecular assemblies [33]. It has been established that CH-π bonding induces stretching of the C–H bonds, resulting in a redshift of the CH stretching band [44, 45]. Additionally, the protons of the methyl group may function as proton donors in CH-π interactions, thereby leading to an anticipated redshift of the CH symmetric stretching band in the methyl group of the 2-methylimidazolate moiety [31]. However, the symmetric CH stretching band of the methyl group overlaps with the CH stretching bands of the adsorbate molecules. Deconvolution of the infrared bands potentially confirmed the redshift of the CH symmetric stretching band of the methyl group. However, the accuracy of the resultant redshift from this deconvolution was insufficient for a meaningful discussion of the minor wavenumber shifts observed in this study. The elongation of the C–H bonds and the corresponding redshift of the CH symmetric stretching band were also qualitatively corroborated by the molecular assembly of 2-methylimidazole with benzene, 1,3-CHD, and 1,4-CHD, optimized using DFT calculations (Figure S9, Figure S10, and Table S3). Generally, intermolecular CH-π interactions occur within 3 Å [33] and exhibit a high degree of directionality, with the orientation of the C–H bond aligned with that of the π-orbital. Consequently, the C–H and π bonds tend to be oriented nearly perpendicular to each other. Following the formation of the CH-π bond, the adsorbed molecules were arranged such that their molecular planes were positioned at an angle that was nearly perpendicular to the 6MR aperture plane. This orientation facilitates the ingress of adsorbed molecules into the 6MR apertures. Thus, the CH-π interaction between the 2-methylimidazole ring and the adsorbed molecules is crucial for governing the molecular orientation necessary for the effective passage through the 6MR aperture for benzene and cyclic alkenes.
3.3.2 13C CP/MAS NMR spectroscopy
The 13C CP/MAS NMR spectra of ZIF-8, both in its pure form and with various adsorbates are shown in Fig. 7. Cross-polarization (CP) measurements are particularly effective for highlighting immobile molecular segments within solid matrices while attenuating signals from more mobile components. Consequently, the highly mobile adsorbed molecules appeared as minor signals in the spectra. The predominant peaks are attributed to the 2-methylimidazole moiety, suggesting that the ZIF-8 framework exhibited greater rigidity and reduced mobility than the adsorbate molecules. Specifically, the resonance lines at approximately 14, 124, and 151 ppm correspond to the methyl group, CH carbon of the imidazole ring, and quaternary carbon of the 2-methylimidazolate moiety, respectively. Figures 8(a), 8(b), and 8(c) provide enlarged views of these spectral components. Notably, the adsorption of benzene and cyclic alkenes resulted in downfield shifts of 0.5–1.3 ppm in the resonance lines associated with the methyl group and CH carbon of the imidazole ring, whereas the adsorption of cyclohexane did not elicit such shifts. The resonance lines corresponding to quaternary carbons remained largely unchanged after adsorption. These observations suggest a significant interaction between the π-electrons of the adsorbed molecules and both the methyl group and the CH carbon of the 2-methylimidazolate moiety. Our previous studies indicated that both the methyl and CH protons of the imidazole ring can act as proton donors in CH-π bond. According to Pople's point magnetic dipole model [46, 47], the shielding effect of carbon along a perpendicular line through the center of the molecular plane of the benzene ring is described by the equation ΔσC = 51.96/R3, where R represents the average distance between the carbon nucleus of interest and the molecular plane in angstroms (Å). For the optimized structure of the 2-methylimidazole-benzene complex derived from DFT calculations (see Figure S9), R was determined to be 3.27 Å, which yielded a shielding effect of approximately 1.5 ppm. In the case of CH-π bond, the C-H bond is anticipated to elongate owing to the attraction of the proton by the π electrons, resulting in an anti-shielding effect on the 13C nucleus. Scheiner reported an anti-shielding effect of 200 ppm/Å for the tetrel bond of a methyl group [48]. To account for the observed downfield shift, an average elongation of approximately 0.01–0.015 Å in the C-H bond is necessary, which is consistent with the expected bond-length increase associated with a strong CH-π bond. In summary, the downfield shifts in the resonance lines resulting from the adsorption of benzene and cyclic alkenes can be attributed to the CH-π bond between the CH protons of the methyl group and imidazole ring and π electrons of the adsorbed molecules.
3.4 Local structure of molecular passage through 6MR
This study elucidates the intermolecular interactions that dictate molecular orientation during the adsorption of bulky molecules onto ZIF-8, particularly as these molecules navigate through 6MR apertures. The results suggest a specific configuration for benzene and six-membered-ring alicyclic hydrocarbons as they traverse the 6MR aperture (Fig. 9). The CH-π bond are pivotal in influencing the molecular orientation of benzene and cyclic alkenes during their passage through the aperture. As these molecules approach the CH bottleneck of the 6MR, they form CH-π bonds with the CH groups of the 2-methylimidazole ring at this bottleneck. This highly directional CH-π bonding results in an nearly perpendicular (T-shaped) alignment of the imidazole ring and adsorbed molecule. This arrangement ensured that the adsorbed molecules maintained a configuration that minimized their molecular cross-sectional areas (molecular planes) upon entering the 6MR aperture. After successfully passing through the aperture, the adsorbed molecule is stabilized by forming an additional CH-π bond with the methyl group on the methyl bottleneck side (Figure S10).
In contrast, cyclic alkanes such as cyclohexane primarily engage in dispersion-force interactions. The optimal molecular orientation for enhancing these interactions occurs when the plane of the adsorbed molecule is parallel to the 2-methylimidazole ring, as this alignment maximizes the contact area between them. Consequently, a molecule approaching the CH bottleneck side of 6MR is captured by dispersion force interactions with the methyl group and quaternary carbon in the 2-methylimidazolate moieties. This results in the adsorbed molecule orienting its minimum molecular cross-section (molecular face) towards the 6MR aperture, thereby facilitating its entry. After passing through the 6MR aperture, the molecule stabilizes through dispersive force interactions with the three methyl groups on the methyl bottleneck side. Cyclohexene, being a cyclic alkene, also exhibits significant contributions from dispersion force interactions due to its substantial proportion of saturated hydrocarbon components, in addition to the CH-π interactions (see Figure S10).
Finally, ZIF-8 exhibited remarkably different diffusion coefficients for 1.3-CHD and 1,4-CHD. This result is of particular interest because it highlights the potential of ZIF-8 as a molecular sieve for isomer separation. Further investigation is necessary to elucidate these detailed mechanisms. However, the isomer distinction may involve the symmetry of the phonon modes associated with the swing effect of the bridging ligands that constitute the 6MR, as well as the symmetry of the adsorbate molecule. Additionally, considering the aspect of configuration diffusion, this isomer distinction might be linked to the internal arrangement of π electrons through the CH-π bond, which controls the molecular orientation with respect to the 6MR aperture.