The environmental anthropization generated by humanity is recurrent and imminent. Actions that mitigate and remedy degradation and pollution status are the main strategies for maintaining a more sustainable development that is less harmful to the environment (Twardowska et al., 2007). Among the main agents of environmental degradation, environmental pollution stands out, as it poses a significant risk to human health and food safety (Macedo et al., 2022). Technological development generates large amounts of waste throughout its production chain, from the primary chain, in the generation of inputs such as agriculture and mining, to the final product for the consumer, before going through processing and industry (Almeida et al., 2013). In addition to the waste generated during the process, there is also solid waste and disposal after use and consumption.
Pollution by chemical and organic elements occurs all the time. Chemical pollution, unlike organic pollution, hardly has any efficient decomposer organisms in the environment (Okoye et al., 2022). This makes it challenging to manage the restoration and remediation of environments polluted by chemical elements, commonly referred to as potentially toxic elements (PTEs) (Okoye et al., 2022; Nieder & Benbi, 2024). Free PTEs in the environment can be harmful to human health and the environment. In general, most chemical elements in high concentrations have potential toxicity, but PTEs in even lower concentrations are dangerous and harmful, especially xenobiotic elements, such as some heavy metals (MPs) like lead, cadmium and mercury, for example, which are highly incompatible with biological life (Štefanac et al., 2021; Nieder & Benbi, 2024).
Lead (Pb) has been widely used in various industrial-technological sectors since the Industrial Revolution, such as in the manufacture of batteries, paints, pigments, fuel additives, and metal alloys (Eichler et al., 2015). Obtaining lead ore and separating it generates a large amount of highly toxic waste, and during the smelting process, it contaminates an entire area with a radius of up to 5 miles (Chen et al., 2016). Since exposure to lead is mainly through inhaling contaminated dust and ingesting contaminated water and food, the whole process of the Pb production chain is a potential pollutant and requires remediation measures (Levin et al., 2021). Lead contamination is currently a significant global problem, with an estimated 300 million tons of lead having been exposed to the environment over the last five millennia, especially in the last five centuries (Paoliello, 2001).
Remediation of contaminated areas can be carried out using physical, chemical, and biological techniques. Physical strategies are usually quite costly and risky, followed by chemical strategies which, in addition to being unattractive, can cause other types of contamination due to the chemical reagents that would remediate or neutralize the PTEs in the environment (Liu et al., 2018). Currently, biological techniques for soil and water remediation have shown great potential for large-scale applications, particularly in bioremediation. This is because numerous studies have been conducted in recent decades on biological agents, such as plants and microorganisms capable of enhancing the degradation of PTEs in the environment and/or their removal by some biological mechanisms of these organisms (Bhanse et al., 2022; Azhar et al., 2022).
A primary current tool of these biological strategies is phytoremediation, which consists of using plants that can grow through the phytotoxicity of PTEs; as in the case of Pb, the plant will tolerate the Pb-toxicity, will grow in the contaminated soil, and during its cycle will phytoaccumulate, phytoextract and phytostabilize the Pb ions present in the soil (Etim, 2012; Liu et al., 2024). In addition, the roots optimize the microbial community in the soil, where the rhizosphere area becomes an active agent for degrading or stabilizing Pb ions, and some plant species can emit exudates capable of enhancing these activities (Gavrilescu, 2022; Breton-Deval et al., 2022).
Some species have been used in Pb phytoremediation techniques, but many do not show potential, despite developing under Pb phytotoxicity; they do not have the capacity to bioaccumulate PTE, nor to optimize secondary interactions such as phytostabilization (Pasricha et al., 2021; Sladkovska et al., 2022). Plants that, in addition to tolerating the abiotic stress generated, can absorb and accumulate metal ions are hyperaccumulators, and in the case of HMs, they have been called metallophyte species (Fernández-Fernández et al., 2008; Fernando et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2022). Examples applied to Pb are vetiver grass (Vetiveria zizanioides) (Yoga & Tangahu, 2022), pigeonpea (Canavalia ensiformis) (Pereira et al., 2010), sunflower (Helianthus annuus) (Yoga & Tangahu, 2022), and castor bean (Ricinus communis) (Bauddh et al., 2015), used in the phytoremediation of lead-contaminated soils.
More recent studies have pointed out some tropical grasses as potential HMs-hyperaccumulators, common in the phytoremediation of soils with cadmium (Cd) and nickel (Ni) (Rabêlo et al., 2021). Potentialities have also been noted for Pb in species of the genus Penisetum, Megathyrsus, and Urochloa (Das et al., 2017; Rabêlo et al., 2021; Farnezi et al., 2022), especially species that have C4 metabolism. However, the efficiency of bioremediation by the plant does not depend solely on its characteristics and potential; it can vary due to other factors, such as soil conditions and the concentration of lead present (Butcher, 2009). The chemical composition, pH, texture, and the presence of other contaminants in the soil can affect the ability of grasses to absorb HMs (Rabêlo et al., 2021). In addition, at very high concentrations, some plants may be unable to absorb and accumulate lead efficiently, leading to less effective bioremediation (Egendorf et al., 2020).
Seeking to fill gaps and look for trends in phytoremediation by grasses (Rabêlo et al., 2021; Sladkovska et al., 2022), we investigated the phytoremediation of Pb by a cosmopolitan grass, Urochloa brizantha Hochst. ex A.Rich. cv. Marandú, using two contaminated soils, one with a clayey texture and the other with sandy texture. We also varied the Pb concentrations according to the guideline values proposed by the Brazilian Environmental Resolution (Brazil, 2023). This study aims to deepen our understanding of how the grass species resists Pb phytotoxicity in the soil by analyzing plant development in its physiological and metabolic aspects, thus being able to optimize the management of the species during the phytoremediation technique.
Our main questions to outline the study were: i) Do physiological and metabolic strategies occur for the species to develop in the face of abiotic stress generated by Pb? ii) Will soils of contrasting textures provide different levels of Pb-availability and toxicity? So, a controlled contamination trial of contrasting textured soils with different Pb concentrations was conducted, after which U. brizantha grasses were grown to phytoremediate the soils. In this way, this study model can be analysed to understand photosynthesis, metabolism, growth, and Pb-bioaccumulation in the face of Pb contamination levels in soils with different textures.