We demonstrate that a lower relative amount of organized nervous tissue within neuromas is significantly associated with increased pain intensity, suggesting that structural preservation plays a key protective role, regardless of the underlying source of nociceptive input.
While prior studies have focused on inflammatory infiltrates or mechanical stressors like connective tissue proliferation as primary drivers of neuroma pain [25, 9, 26, 11, 12], our findings shift attention toward the internal nerve architecture itself. Although connective tissue was present in both neuromas and control nerves, we observed no significant differences in its relative or absolute amounts between groups. This supports previous findings that while connective tissue is commonly seen in neuromas, its abundance is not necessarily pathognomonic [27]. Notably, our segmentation approach did not differentiate between intrafascicular and extrafascicular connective tissue neither distinguished between perineurial cells and fibroblasts, which could influence its pathological relevance. Moreover, connective tissue proliferation may be influenced by prior surgical interventions [28] , possibly explaining inconsistencies across studies. In our cohort, however, connective tissue quantity showed no correlation with reported pain intensity, suggesting that its presence and implication in the generation of aberrant signaling alone is insufficient to account for inter-individual differences in neuroma pain.
Further, our findings highlight significant disparities in the relative amount of adipose tissue between control nerves and those affected by neuromas, challenging the traditional view that does not consider adipose tissue a key factor in neuroma-related pain. This observation prompts consideration of lipid metabolism's impact on nerve injury and repair processes. Research indicates elevated levels of specific lipids, like phosphatidylcholine, sphingomyelin, and ceramides, in injured nerve tissues, with ceramide levels notably correlating with the severity of diabetic neuropathy [29, 30, 31, 32]. Yet, it remains uncertain whether these changes in lipid metabolism are unique to neuromas or represent a universal response to (peripheral) nerve damage. A comparative analysis revealed no significant difference in the absolute amount of adipose tissue between the control and neuroma groups, suggesting that the total adipose tissue content remains unchanged. However, neuroma growth appears to reduce the proportion of other tissues relative to adipose tissue. Beyond serving as energy storage, adipose tissue may offer protective benefits, as evidenced by the pioneering work of Millesi et al., who utilized adipose pad grafts in nerve surgery to mitigate the risk of postoperative neuromas and shield the nerve from external pressures [33]. The adipose pad provides a cushioning effect around the nerve, isolating it from surrounding tissues and reducing the risk of neuroma formation and pain [34, 33]. Several other studies could show that an increased amount of adipose tissue surrounding the transected nerve (e.g. by fat grafting) accelerates neuronal regeneration and prevents disorganized axonal outgrowth because of increased vascularization and reduced inflammatory processes, and secondary decreased fibrosis and hypertrophy of the connective tissues. Additionally, adipose tissue prevents strangling of the transected nerve by contraction of the surrounding tissues and entrapment [35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40] Finally, adipose tissue has also recently been shown to play a paracrine role in promoting a metabolic shift in Schwann cells that is necessary for an appropriate repair response to injury [32].
Despite the localization of adipose tissue within rather than surrounding, the nerves in our study, its potential protective role for nerve fascicles cannot be discounted. The diminished cushioning from increased neuroma pressure could enhance spontaneous afferent signals to the spinal cord, potentially heightening sensitivity in nociceptive fibers and promoting both peripheral and central sensitization. Yet, our findings reveal no distinction in pain experience between patients with or without neuromas, indicating that the presence of adipose tissue within the neuroma does not directly influence pain perception.
In our study, we observed that the balance between organized and unorganized nervous tissue was closely associated with pain intensity. Patients reporting neuroma pain were noted to have a predominance of unorganized over organized nervous tissue, a disparity underscored by comparing the absolute areas covered by each tissue type. Remarkably, the area occupied by organized nervous tissue was substantially larger in patients without neuroma pain.
However, when correlating these morphological characteristics with pain levels, no significant relationship was found with the absolute nor relative measures of the identified criteria. Nonetheless, a significant negative correlation was observed between pain levels and the relative amount of organized nervous tissue, as well as the ratio of organized to unorganized tissue. This suggests a complex interplay between tissue organization within neuromas and the manifestation of pain, highlighting the intricate dynamics of neuropathic pain mechanisms.
An explanation for the observed phenomenon might rely on the Gate Control Theory of Pain [41], which suggests that pain perception is modulated by the interplay between pain-inhibiting and pain-facilitating impulses in the nervous system. According to this theory, intact organized nervous tissue post-peripheral nerve injury plays a crucial role in preserving sensory information integrity, thereby mitigating the risk of chronic pain through accurate transmission of tissue damage signals to the central nervous system. Conversely, a decrease in organized nervous tissue may elevate the likelihood of transmitting distorted signals, enhancing pain sensitivity and potentially leading to chronic pain conditions.
If the ratio between nociceptive and non-nociceptive fibers in nerves and fascicles, which is highly variable [42], was maintained in neuromas, the Gate Control Theory would not explain the correlation between organized nervous tissue and neuroma pain. However, it was shown that unmyelinated C- and thin Aδ-fibers are predominant in neuromas [43, 44] (some studies suggesting a massive predominance of unmyelinated fibers by 20:1 [43]). The increase in the proportion of unmyelinated fibers is induced by the upregulation of neurotrophic factors during nerve regeneration like neuron growth factor (NFG), which promote their regeneration [10]. Therefore, a higher relative amount of unorganized nervous tissue would highly increase the proportion of nociceptive signals to the dorsal horn and at the same time decrease the amount of counteracting signals from myelinated non-nociceptive fibers.
To conclude, while most studies addressed the origins of aberrant nociceptive signaling, our results suggest that the degree of preserved internal nerve organization plays a critical role in modulating pain perception. This structural integrity may act as a buffer against the functional consequences of neuroma degeneration, offering a new morphometric biomarker for predicting pain severity.
Importantly, while our approach captures static structural features, it does not account for dynamic neural signaling or central sensitization, which most probably also contribute to pain variability. In addition, our study is limited by its focus on a single region of transversely cut nerves, leaving open the question of how other regions might contribute to inter sample variability, and by its reliance on purely morphological rather than molecular characterization. However, the observed associations between structural integrity and pain perception remain robust.