Study Design
This qualitative study used a narrative research approach, as described by the Clandinin and Connelly (2000), where narrative inquiry is viewed as “a way of understanding experience” and involves studying the lived experiences of individuals as they are expressed in stories. The researcher and participant often engage collaboratively in co-constructing the narrative.14
Data were collected through Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) and In-Depth Interviews (IDIs). FGDs provided insights into shared perceptions and social dynamics influencing participants’ acceptance of new diagnostic tools, while IDIs allowed for detailed exploration of individual experiences, professional opinions, and policy-level considerations.
Study Site and Duration
This study was conducted at the Projahnmo surveillance area in Zakiganj sub-district, Sylhet district, Bangladesh. The site was established in 2001 through a partnership between Johns Hopkins University, the Bangladesh Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MOHFW), Bangladeshi academic institutions and non-government organizations (NGOs) including Projahnmo Research Foundation. The study was conducted from March to April 2025. The location map of the study site is shown in Fig. 1.
Study Population
For the FGDs, the study population were the caregivers (male and female) of children under 2 years old, community health care providers (CHCPs), and community leaders. CHCPs are trained health workers, and staff of Community Clinics (CCs)—small, government-established health centers at the village level. Each community clinic typically serves about 6,000 people. CHCPs are responsible for providing basic health services. Community leaders are individuals who hold influence, authority, or respect within their local communities and often play critical roles in social mobilization, dispute resolution, and local development.
Under-2 children’s caregivers were divided into male and female FGD groups separately to encourage more open and honest discussion. In many cultural contexts, especially those with traditional gender roles, participants may feel uncomfortable or restrained discussing sensitive topics—such as child health, caregiving practices, or household dynamics—in mixed-gender settings. By conducting gender-specific groups, the study aimed to create a safe and comfortable environment where participants could express their views freely without fear of judgment, social pressure, or embarrassment.
Four IDIs were conducted with key stakeholders, including a national-level policymaker, a national-level policymaker and implementer, a division-level health administrator, and an upazila (subdistrict)-level health administrator.
The study used purposive sampling to select participants with relevant knowledge and experience regarding child health and healthcare service delivery.
Data Collection Procedures
Data collection was conducted for the four FGDs and four IDIs. Each FGD lasted between 1.5 to 2 hours, while IDIs lasted approximately 30–45 minutes.
A semi-structured interview guide was used across all FGDs and IDIs to ensure consistency in topics while allowing flexibility to explore emerging themes. The guides were tailored to each participant group (e.g., we would ask carers about their experiences in bringing their children with respiratory symptoms to the community clinics and ask CHCPs about their experiences in treating these children). Prior to the discussions, participants received a verbal explanation (detailed below) of the proposed idea of AI-based tool to ensure conceptual understanding. These explanations were not part of the data collection, and the AI tool hasn’t been developed yet.
The proposed AI tool included:
Digital stethoscope: To record lung sounds at four chest positions (two front, two back), each lasting ~ 10 seconds (total ~ 60 seconds), capturing 3–4 full breathing cycles (inspiration and expiration) per site. An example of a digital stethoscope is shown in Fig. 2.
Video image recording: A 60-second video of the child’s breathing from nose to lower chest wall, potentially captured via mobile phone. An example of video-based recording of chest movements is shown in Fig. 3.
Research Team and Training
A qualitative researcher led data collection with a background in anthropology and experience in conducting qualitative methods, including FGDs, IDIs, data analysis, and reporting. A Research Assistant (RA) with a social science background and some research experience supported data collection. The RA received specific training and was supervised by the qualitative researcher. TS and AMK conducted an orientation session on the study protocol for the research team.
Ethical Considerations
All participants provided written informed consent before participation. All discussions and interviews were conducted in Bangla, and audio-recorded with participant permission. The study received ethical approval from Edinburgh Medical School Research Ethics Committee (EMREC) with reference number 24-EMREC-078 and Projahnmo Research Foundation Institutional Review Board (PRF IRB) with reference number PR-25001.
Data Management and Analysis
Audio recordings were transcribed verbatim and translated into English. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis, identifying key themes and sub-themes. The process began with a thorough, line-by-line reading of the data, during which initial codes were assigned to segments that appeared meaningful or relevant. These codes were then reviewed to identify connections and group similar ideas together. Through this process, broader patterns emerged, leading to the development of potential themes that captured significant aspects of the data in relation to the research question. This approach facilitated the transition from raw data to more organized and interpretable findings.
A matrix table was developed to organize, compare, and analyze data across participant groups.
Grounded Theory was used for this study as it enables the inductive development of a conceptual model grounded in the perspectives and experiences of healthcare providers, caregivers, and stakeholders regarding the implementation of AI-driven video and digital auscultation tools in diagnosing respiratory distress in young children. Given the limited existing research on the adoption of such technologies in low-resource settings like Zakiganj, Sylhet, this approach allows for the identification of emergent themes and processes related to feasibility and acceptability. By systematically analyzing qualitative data, Grounded Theory facilitates a nuanced understanding of contextual factors and user interactions, thereby informing strategies for effective integration and broader application of these innovative diagnostic tools.