In this secondary analysis of the VITAL trial, we assessed feasibility and uptake of mHealth support options to people with HIV taking ART in Lesotho. Both the uptake of SMS support options and the technical success rate of SMS delivery were high. Uptake of other telemedical support, such as enhanced adherence counseling via phone or callbacks by a nurse for any medical concerns were relatively low. Success-rate of automated tuberculosis symptoms screening calls were extremely low due to technical problems making it impossible to conclude on their acceptability in our study. Overall, our findings show that for a majority, using SMS notifications as adherence and visit reminder and to directly communicate viral load results to patients appears to be highly acceptable and feasible in the rural context of Lesotho.
Our findings regarding SMS communication align with previous studies from low and middle income countries, demonstrating the feasibility and acceptance of SMS-based communication in delivering HIV-related health information, particularly in supporting adherence to ART and attendance at pharmacy visits in HIV care (1, 3, 30). Evidence across diverse settings, including Lesotho, South Africa, and Kenya show that ART adherence SMS reminders have been found to be feasible and acceptable(3, 17, 30–32). There is less evidence on direct viral load results communication to people with HIV. This approach was reported to be acceptable in small explorative studies in southern Africa (3, 33, 34). To our knowledge, this is the largest scale study testing this approach in such a setting. Considering that viral load results may often get lost, not communicated to patients or communicated too lately, reporting it automatically directly to the patient may potentially increase result awareness and make sure unsuppressed viral loads are followed by an action (35).
Enhanced adherence counselling through a phone call was not widely utilised, with only 11 (2.5%) of participants with viremia opting for this service. This is in contrast to a previous pilot study where participants were asked hypothetically about preferred enhanced adherence counselling mode and all participants requested adherence counselling by phone (36). Further studies report voice and interactive calls in HIV management to be popular (1, 10, 37). For instance, a study in Nigeria with 484 participants from key populations with HIV found that phone-based enhanced adherence counselling was slightly more effective than conventional in-person enhanced adherence counseling in achieving viral re-suppression (38). In contrast, in our study the anticipated benefits of remote counselling, such as reduced travel time and cost savings, may not have been significant enough to influence participants’ choices. Furthermore, phone co-ownership might have limited the utilisation of remote enhanced adherence counselling. Finally, there is a possibility that clinic nurses deviated from VITAL guidelines/protocol by not offering remote enhanced adherence counselling as an option to eligible participants, resulting in low uptake of the remote counselling interventions.
Similarly, the callback service option to the study nurse was not used very frequently. This is in contrast to the findings of the VITAL pilot study, where 97% of participants stated that they would like a callback option in the future (36). A cross-sectional study conducted at an HIV clinic in Durban, used an opt-out process enabling participants to send a free "Please Call Me" message to a specific clinic mobile phone. Participants of this study reported that the approach was easy to use (31). Similarly, to our study, a trial in Kenya established two-way SMS communication with professional nurses, but only 3.3% of participants per week actively requested a call from the nurse (39).
Automated remote tuberculosis screening calls have the potential to identify individuals with tuberculosis symptoms for further clinical evaluation and diagnosis. However, in our study, technical constraints do not allow to conclude on their acceptability or usefulness. Among 31 successfully contacted participants, almost 40% self-reported symptoms. But among those identified to have tuberculosis symptoms, none thereafter attended the clinic for tuberculosis work-up, indicating a potential large gap in the diagnostic cascade. Cell phone turnover, as observed at an HIV clinic in South Africa (31), could have impacted the accessibility of our remote tuberculosis screening calls, which underscores the importance of regularly updating participants contact information to maintain the feasibility of mobile health interventions. Another way to leverage the success of the SMS uptake would be to propose providing TB symptom screens by SMS instead of automated calls.
Limitations of the study
This study had several limitations. First, we were unable to verify whether delivered SMS messages were read by participants. Second, automated tuberculosis screening calls faced significant technical challenges, which did not allow us to evaluate their uptake. Third, this study only assessed technical feasibility and uptake, thus not allowing to conclude on the effectiveness of these mHealth interventions in improving health outcomes.