The patient’s APC germline PV at amino acid 1127 lies upstream of the first 20 amino-acid repeat that comprises one of the main β-catenin binding sites in the protein. It is unusual for a predicted truncating germline PV at this position in APC to be accompanied by LOH at the same locus, as there is a selective pressure to retain at least one of the 20 amino-acid repeats between residues 1265 and 1400 for effective tumour formation in the colon(7). The only other reported patient with FAP and WDFLAC never underwent germline or somatic genetic testing (4), so their tumour’s second APC somatic hit cannot be determined. While none of the WDFLAC cases presented by de Kock et al.(5) and Chong et al.(6) had confirmed co-diagnoses of FAP, the latter article did report one case with a clear loss of heterozygosity for APC at p.G871* (VAF 0.77), which, similar to our current patient, would also produce a protein missing its key β-catenin binding sites. Due to these findings, we postulate that LOH of the wild-type APC allele at residue 1127, accompanying the germline pathogenic variant, predisposed this patient to develop a WDFLAC.
A new report investigating biallelic inactivation of tumour suppressor genes (TSGs) across multiple cancer databases showed that amongst rare, mutated TSGs found in non-canonical primaries, biallelic loss of APC was commonly present in prostate adenocarcinomas and lung adenocarcinomas (LUADs) (8). Though the percentage of LUADs with LOH in APC was not always significantly higher than LUADs with wild-type APC, β-catenin protein levels were significantly elevated in the former. There was also a degree of mutual exclusivity in mutations of WNT pathway genes implicated in LUADs (8). This is in line with our finding of wild-type CTNNB1 in our patient’s tumour, but Chong et al.(6) did note a patient with both mutated CTNNB1 and APC. However, this patient did appear to retain one wild-type copy of APC, so the CTNNB1 mutation may have played a more significant role in tumour formation. These results, nonetheless, do lead to the question of why there are not higher rates of lung cancer in FAP patients. It points to the possibility of spatiotemporal factors, or that other pathways take precedence over WNT in LUAD pathogenesis.
The DICER1 NGS results corroborate our earlier findings on WDFLAC (5, 6) and that of several other groups (Table 1(9–12)). The two pathogenic DICER1 hits in the patient’s tumour, as well as its “fetal”-type morphology, are characteristic of other DICER1-related tumours (13). There are WDFLAC cases, however, where neither WNT-pathway nor DICER1 mutations were found (6), so there may be other pathways implicated in its development. However, an interaction between the two does appear to be exist in other types of tumours. Chong et al.(6) analyzed sequencing data to show that DICER1 and CTNNB1 pathogenic mutations often co-occur in the related tumor, pulmonary blastoma. To et al.(14) were able to establish directionality in the interaction within ovarian cancer metastases, showing that β-catenin downregulates the expression of DICER1 mRNA in highly metastatic ovarian cancer lines. Contrastingly, in Illiou et al.’s (15) study where they generated DICER1-impaired CRC cell lines, these lines were shown to have greater nuclear accumulation of β-catenin compared to their wild-type counterparts, though it must be noted that they already had deleterious mutations in CTNNB1 or APC.
Table 1
Findings from previous genetic studies of low-grade/well-differentiated fetal lung adenocarcinoma (WDFLAC), with a focus on those which tested for both the presence of WNT pathway and DICER1 gene variants. All listed variants are somatic unless otherwise mentioned.
Reference | Genes Tested | Case | Genetic Variant(s) (VAF) |
|---|
de Kock et al. (5) | CTNNB1, DICER1 | 1a | CTNNB1 p.S33C; DICER1 p.Y1180* (germline) and p.D1709G |
Liu et al. (9) | CTNNB1, DICER1, KRAS | 2a | CTNNB1 p.S33C (0.41); DICER1 p.S1470Lfs*19 (0.32) and p.D1709N (0.38) |
Zhang et al. (10) | Whole-exome sequencing (WES) | 3a | MYCN p.T58M (0.14) |
3b | CTNNB1 p.G34R (0.27); DICER1 p.D1810Y (0.25) |
3c | CTNNB1 p.S33C (0.29); DICER1 p.E1813G (0.37) |
Li et al. (11) | 1021 cancer-related genes (custom probes) | 4a | CTNNB1 p.S33C (0.43); DICER1 p.Q488* (0.40) and p.D1709V (0.37) |
4b | CTNNB1 p.S37F (0.38); DICER1 p.D1810F (0.36) and p.A1710del (0.293); MYCN p.P44L (0.45); RARA p.S287L (0.64); EGFR p.D247G (0.35); C15orf23 p.T47K (0.15) |
4c | CTNNB1 p.D32Y (0.48); DICER1 p.D1709A (0.84) |
4d | CTNNB1 p.S37F (0.38); DICER1 p.5096-1G > T (0.38) and p.D1810Y (0.35) |
Yanagawa et al. (12) | CTNNB1, DICER1, KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA and EGFR | 5a | CTNNB1 p.S33F |
5b | CTNNB1 p.S37F; DICER1 p.D1709G |
Chong et al. (6) | 592 genes (Agilent SureSelect XT Panel) | 6a | CTNNB1 p.D32Y (0.43); DICER1 p.Q1580* (0.47) and p.E1813D (0.38); APC p.R1640fs (0.41) |
6b | DICER1 p.Q1614* (0.23) and p.E1813Q (0.26); CDKN2A p.E88* (0.31); KRAS p.G12 (0.2); STK11 p.G171fs (0.35) |
6c | CTNNB1 p. S37F (0.38); DICER1 p.W400* (0.33) and p.D1810Y (0.31) |
6d | DICER1 p.G1809L (0.55); APC p.L2718_E2719delinsF* (0.54); FUBP1 p.Q628* (0.31); WRN p.Y1091* (0.35); TP53 p.E294* (0.65) |
6e | CTNNB1 p. L2718_E2719delinsRF (0.27) and p. S33C (0.09); DICER1 p.W1831* (0.29) and p.D1709N (0.56); STK11 p.D68fs (0.58); U2AF1 p.S34F (0.4) |
6f | DICER1 p.D1810Y (0.56); APC p.G871* (0.77); TP53 p.R273L (0.79) |
| * We also reviewed the recent study by Sun et al. (PMID: 38831114), but we noticed some inconsistencies in their findings. Firstly, their reported WDFLAC patient demographics (male, > 50 years old) were atypical, as WDFLAC is mostly diagnosed in females under 40. Their WES results also showed that BLTP1 was the only commonly mutated gene across four of the eight cases, a gene which has not been previously linked to WDFLAC. Two of the BLTP1 mutations were silent, and all the variants were sub-clonal mutations with a VAF < 0.20. Lastly, our internal enrichment analysis of their data revealed that only cigarette-smoking-affiliated genes were enriched in the set, which coincides with the reported patient histories and suggests that most of the reported variants are unrelated to the etiology of WDFLAC. Given the inconclusive results of the study, we chose to exclude it from our report. |
Taken together with the results of our current case, DICER1 and WNT pathway PVs appear to play a synergistic role in the tumorigenesis of several tumours and influence the cell morphology of non-small cell lung cancers. We believe the absence of full-length APC in this patient’s lung tumor may have set the stage for development of a WDFLAC, driven by somatic DICER1 PVs. As such, in diagnostically challenging cases, testing for DICER1 variants could provide value. Furthermore, if a germline DICER1 PV is found, screening for DICER1-associated tumors, which often present in childhood, could be instigated.