Cell culture and treatment
NG108-15 cells (ATCC Cell Bank, Shanghai, China). All cell experimental procedures described herein follow established protocols routinely employed in our research facility, with comprehensive methodological descriptions available in previous reports [42].
Ultrapure water was used to dissolve the sodium fluoride (NaF) (> 99% purity, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and Sal (Guangzhou KKL Med Co., Ltd.) followed by dilution in DMEM medium to the target concentrations prior to experimental treatment. Based on prior IC50 data (80 mg/L NaF) [2], NG108-15 cells at 70–80% confluency, were treated with NaF at 0, 20 (1/4 IC50), 40 (1/2 IC50), and 80 mg/L (IC50) for 24 hours. To assess the impact of P2X7R/NF-κB/NLRP3 signaling on fluoride-induced neurotoxicity, Sal was administered in vitro. Dose-response optimization was performed via the Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8, MCE Company, USA) assay to determine the most biologically relevant Sal concentration. To minimize variability and confirm experimental validity, each assay was conducted at least three independent times.
To determine the non-cytotoxic concentration range of Sal, NG108-15 cells were treated with escalating doses of Sal (control, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, and 100 µmol/L) for 24 h. The CCK-8 assay results suggested that 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, and 100 µmol/L Sal treatments induced no cytotoxicity in NG108-15 cells. Therefore, based on the research results of others, a treatment concentration of 50 µmol/L was selected for intervention [35] (Fig. 4A). To evaluate Sal’s protective effect, cells were first exposed to a toxin for 24 hours; the medium was then replaced, with the treatment group receiving fresh medium containing 50 µmol/L Sal and control groups receiving Sal-free medium. After a further 24-hour incubation, cells were harvested for analysis (Fig. 4B).
Animals and treatments
We bought 16 pregnant SD rats from the Guizhou Laboratory Animal Engineering Technology Center (Certificate No SCXK 2023-0002 in Guizhou, Grade SPF). All rats were housed in plastic cages within an animal facility. Animals were housed under environmental conditions: temperature 22 ± 2°C, relative humidity 65 ± 5%, and a 12-hour light/12-hour dark photo period (light intensity: 278 lux). The animal care guidelines approved by the Ethics Committee of Guizhou Medical University (No. 2303017) to conduct animal experimental procedures.
The exposure doses were determined based on the acute oral toxicity (LD50 = 147.5 mg/kg) of NaF in rats. Sub-lethal doses corresponding to 1/20 LD50 (7.375 mg/kg), 1/10 LD50 (14.75 mg/kg), and 1/5 LD50 (29.5 mg/kg) were chosen to evaluate chronic effects. This dose aligns with previous research, which demonstrated dose-dependent neurotoxicity in Wistar rats exposed to fluoride ion concentrations of 25, 50, and 100 mg/L (equivalent to 55, 110, and 221 mg/L NaF, based on molecular mass ratio of NaF to F−) [43]. To further investigate the mechanisms of fluoride-induced neurotoxicity, rats in current study were assigned to four treatment groups: control, low-dose sodium fluoride (60 mg/L NaF), medium-dose (120 mg/L NaF), and high-dose (240 mg/L NaF).
The exposure method involved free drinking water administration across 2 generations. Sixteen pregnant SD rats were continuously exposed from parental gestation until postnatal day 21 (PND21) of their first generation (F1) offspring. From each group, 8 F1 rats (1:1 male-female ratio) were then selected by body weight and maintained on the same exposure regimen until sexual maturity (~ 90 days). Subsequently, 6 F1 rats per group (2 males:1 female) were co-housed for mating and continued exposure until their F2 offspring reached PND21. Finally, 8 F2 rats per group (1:1 male-female ratio) were then selected and exposed until PND 90 (Fig. 2A).
At the end of treatment, urine, serum and brain were collected for biochemical analysis. Following euthanasia, brain tissue was rapidly extracted on ice, rinsed in chilled saline, and dissected to isolate the striatum. For this, the cerebral cortex was gently retracted bilaterally, and the striatal region excised. The cortex of the brain was divided for further multiple analyses.
radial arm maze (RAM) test
Spatial learning and memory in F2 rats were assessed using RAM (XR-XB102, Shanghai Xinruan). Adapt the animals to the experimental environment for one week. Weigh the animals and fast them for 24 hours. The maze consisted of eight arms and a connected central platform. Among these eight arms, arms 1, 2, 4, and 5 were designated as baited arms, while the remaining arms 3, 6, 7 and 8 were termed unbaited arms. Each arm was distinguished by a piece of paper featuring a different geometric shape, pasted at the end of the arm. During the training phase, food pellets were scattered throughout the entire maze on the first day for a 5-minute animal exploration period. On subsequent days, food was only placed within the baited arms. During the final seven days of the treatment schedule, memory parameters were recorded during the 5-minute exploration sessions. These parameters included the time taken to consume all four baits (TTB), working memory errors (WME), and reference memory errors (RME). WME were calculated as the total number of re-entries into arms where the bait had already been consumed. Entries into arms that were never baited were counted as RME.
Measurements of fluoride concentrations
Fluoride concentrations in urine, brain tissue, and serum were determined using ion-selective electrode analysis in accordance with following standardized protocols. Measurement of urinary fluoride adhered to the Chinese national standard WS/T 89-2015: a standard curve (0.1–10.0 mg/L NaF) was prepared, diluted with total ion strength adjustment buffer (TISAB), and analyzed using a fluoride ion electrode, with a detection limit of 0.1 mg/L [44]. Brain tissue (0.2 g per sample) was ashed in a muffle furnace, dissolved in HCl, neutralized with NaOH, mixed with TISAB, and fluoride levels were calculated via electrode readings against a standard curve. Serum fluoride was determined following WS/T 212–2001: blood samples were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min, and the supernatant was mixed with TISAB prior to electrode measurement. Double-deionized water was used as the reference matrix. Sample analyses included technical replicates, and data represent averaged values.
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) examination
For TEM analysis of striatal tissue, striatal tissue was dissected and sectioned into 1 mm³ blocks, immediately fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde and 2% paraformaldehyde at 4°C for 4 h, and rinsed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Next, post-fix in 1% osmium tetroxide at room temperature for 2 h, protected from light, and rinse again three times with PBS. Dehydrate the samples through a graded ethanol series, then transition to 100% acetone. Subsequently, ultrathin sections (70 nm in thickness) were prepared using an ultramicrotome and mounted onto formvar-coated copper grids. Following sectioning, grids underwent staining with 4% uranyl acetate for 15–30 minutes and 0.5% lead citrate for 3–15 minutes. Striatal ultrastructure was then examined using a transmission electron microscope (Japan, hitachi, HT7800).
Histopathological examination
Striatal tissues from F2 SD rats were fixed for HE staining through 24-hour fixation in 4% paraformaldehyde, trimming, sequential dehydration (70%, 95%, 100% ethanol; xylene), and final paraffin encapsulation. Sections (5–7 µm thick) were cut using a microtome, floated on warm water (40°C), mounted on slides, and dried. After differentiation and bluing, sections were counterstained with eosin for 6 min, dehydrated, cleared in xylene, and mounted with neutral gum. Histopathological alterations were examined using a Nikon Eclipse E100 upright optical microscope (Nikon Corporation, Japan)
Western blot analysis
All Western blot procedures described herein follow established protocols routinely employed in our research facility, with comprehensive methodological descriptions available in previous reports [42]. The antibodies used were as follows: NLRP3 (1:2000, Proteintech Group, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), ASC (1:2000, Proteintech Group, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA.), Caspase-1 (1:2000, Biogot technology, co, Ltd.), GSDMD (1:2000, Baijia Biotechnology Co., Ltd), GSDMD-N (1:2000, Baijia Biotechnology Co., Ltd), IL-1β (1:1000, Baijia Biotechnology Co., Ltd), IL-18 (1:1000, ABclonal Biotechnology Co., Ltd.), P2X7R (1:2000, Biogot technology, co, Ltd. Biogot technology, co, Ltd. MA, USA), NF-κB (1:2000, Huabio Biotechnology Co., Ltd), and β-actin (1:5000, Zen-Bioscience Co., Ltd.).
The gray values were determined using ImageJ 1.53. This software is a widely - used and reliable tool for analyzing digital images.
Reverse transcription-quantitative real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR)
The RT-qPCR utilized in this study are standard protocols routinely implemented in our laboratories and have been extensively detailed in prior publications [42]. The primer sequences utilized in this study are summarized in Tables 1 and 2. Sample were normalized to GAPDH. RT-qPCR was performed on a CFX96 real-time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad, USA). The fluorescence threshold in the real - time quantitative PCR experiments was analyzed using the software of the quantitative PCR system (Bio-Rad, Singapore). This software is specifically designed to process and interpret the fluorescence data generated during the PCR amplification process, providing a basis for further quantitative analysis.
Table 1
Sequences of primers used in RT-qPCR for mRNA detections in SD rat cortex
Gene name | Accession number | Sequence( 5'-3' ) |
|---|
NLRP3 | NC_086028.1 | F | CTTTATCCACTGCCGAGAG |
| | | R | AGCTCATCAAAGCCATCC |
ASC | NC_086019.1 | F | AACCAGGAGGCAGAGGA |
| | | R | AGACAGGAGTTCCCAGAGC |
Caspase-1 | NC_086026.1 | F | GCCGTGGAGAGAAACAAG |
| | | R | TGAAAAGTGAGCCCCTGA |
GSDMD | NC_086025.1 | F | TTGAAGGGTGAAGGCAAG |
| | | R | AGCCAATAAGCAGTTGGG |
IL-1β | NC_086021.1 | F | AGTGTGGATCCCAAACAATACC |
| | | R | AACTGTGCAGACTCAAACTCCA |
IL-18 | NC_086026.1 | F | CGACCGAACAGCCAACGAATC |
| | | R | TCACAGCCAGTCCTCTTACTTCAC |
P2X7R | NC_086030.1 | F | GCCTGAGCTACATCGCA |
| | | R | GGGGTCCAACACTCTCTTC |
NF-κB | NC_086019.1 | F | TGCCAAGAGTGATGACGA |
| | | R | CCCATGTCCTGCTCCTT |
GAPDH | NC_086022.1 | F | GACATGCCGCCTGGAGAAAC |
| | | R | AGCCCAGGATGCCCTTTAGT |
Table 2
Sequences of primers used in RT-qPCR for mRNA detections in NG108-15 cells
Gene name | Accession number | Sequence( 5'-3' ) |
|---|
NLRP3 | NC_000077.7 | F | ATTACCCGCCCGAGAAAGG |
| | | R | CATGAGTGTGGCTAGATCCAAG |
ASC | NC_000073.7 | F | GACAGTGCAACTGCGAGAAG |
| | | R | CGACTCCAGATAGTAGCTGACAA |
Caspase-1 | NC_000075.7 | F | AATACAACCACTCGTACACGTC |
| | | R | AGCTCCAACCCTCGGAGAAA |
GSDMD | NC_000081.7 | F | ATGCCATCGGCCTTTGAGAAA |
| | | R | AGGCTGTCCACCGGAATGA |
IL-1β | NC_000068.8 | F | GAAATGCCACCTTTTGACAGTG |
| | | R | TGGATGCTCTCATCAGGACAG |
IL-18 | NC_000075.7 | F | AGTGCCAGTGAACCCCAGACC |
| | | R | ACAGAGAGGGTCACAGCCAGTC |
P2X7R | NC_000071.7 | F | GCACCGTCAAGTGGGTCTT |
| | | R | CAGGCTCTTTCCGCTGGTA |
NF-κB | NC_000069.7 | F | TGCGATTCCGCTATAAATGCG |
| | | R | ACAAGTTCATGTGGATGAGGC |
GAPDH | NC_000072.7 | F | AGGTCGGTGTGAACGGATTTG |
| | | R | GGGGTCGTTGATGGCAACA |
Cell viability assay
Following 24 hours of fluoride treatment, 10 µL of the CCK − 8 (MCE Company, USA) detection solution was carefully added to each well. This step initiated the chemical reaction that would ultimately allow for the determination of cell viability based on the resulting absorbance readings. Sal intervention concentrations were determined by preparing a 10 mmol/L stock solution (10 mg Sal dissolved in 3.33 mL ultrapure water under dark conditions, stored at − 80°C) and diluting it to test doses (6.25–100 µmol/L). Absorbance measurements of the samples were conducted at 450 nm.
Statistical analysis
To ensure the reliability and reproducibility of the findings, each experimental procedure was carried out independently and replicated a minimum of three times. This multiple - repetition approach helps to minimize the impact of random errors and provides a more robust basis for data interpretation. All outcomes are reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) served as the primary statistical tool to assess intergroup variations, followed by Least Significant Difference (LSD) tests for pairwise contrasts under conditions of equal variances. For all statistical comparisons in the study, a significance level was predetermined. The chosen significance level was set at α = 0.05.