Chemicals
Mercury chloride (HgCl₂; CAS No: 7487-94-7) and hesperidin (CAS No: 520-26-3, ≥ 80% (HPLC)) used in this study were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The ELISA kits employed in the experiments were supplied by YL-Biont (Shanghai, China) and included the Rat Malondialdehyde (MDA) ELISA Kit (YLA0029RA), Rat Superoxide Dismutase (SOD) ELISA Kit (YLA0115RA), Rat Glutathione (GSH) ELISA Kit (YLA1511RA), Rat Interleukin-1β (IL-1β) ELISA Kit (YLA0030RA), Rat Interleukin-6 (IL-6) ELISA Kit (YLA0031RA), Rat Interleukin-10 (IL-10) ELISA Kit (YLA0440RA), and Rat Tumor Necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α) ELISA Kit (YLA0118RA). All analyses were performed in accordance with the manufacturers’ instructions.
Groups and Experimental Procedure
Sixty male Sprague Dawley rats (220–250 g, 12 weeks old) used in this study were obtained from the Atatürk University Medical Experimental Research Center (ATADEM, Erzurum, Turkey). Following a 7-day acclimatization period, animals were housed in bedding-lined cages enriched with environmental stimulation materials. Throughout the experiment, temperature was maintained at 25 ± 2°C with 55 ± 10% relative humidity under a 12-h light/dark cycle, and food and water were provided ad libitum. Rats were allocated to experimental groups using a computer-based simple randomization method, and all procedures were performed at the same time of day to minimize circadian variability. The experimental protocol was approved by the Atatürk University Animal Experiments Ethics Committee (Approval No: 2024/13/299) and conducted in accordance with ethical guidelines. Hesperidin was dissolved in distilled water and administered intragastrically (1 mL/kg).
Control: Rats received 1 mL distilled water orally once daily for 7 days.
HES400: Rats received hesperidin at 400 mg/kg orally once daily for 7 days.
HgCl₂: Rats were administered HgCl₂ at 1.23 mg/kg intraperitoneally once daily for 7 days [14].
HgCl₂ + HES100: Rats received HgCl₂ (1.23 mg/kg, i.p.) followed 30 minutes later by hesperidin (100 mg/kg, oral) once daily for 7 days [15].
HgCl₂ + HES200: Rats received HgCl₂ (1.23 mg/kg, i.p.) followed 30 minutes later by hesperidin (200 mg/kg, oral) once daily for 7 days [15].
HgCl₂ + HES400: Rats received HgCl₂ (1.23 mg/kg, i.p.) followed 30 minutes later by hesperidin (400 mg/kg, oral) once daily for 7 days [15].
Following the completion of all treatments, rats underwent behavioral testing immediately before sacrifice. All behavioral assessments were performed on the same day by an investigator blinded to the experimental groups.
Behavioral Tests
Open Field Test (OFT)
This test was used to evaluate locomotor activity and anxiety-like behavior. The open field apparatus consisted of a square arena (42 × 42 × 42 cm) equipped with an infrared-based tracking system (MAY ACT 508, Commat, Ankara, Türkiye). No external light source was used during testing; locomotor parameters were detected exclusively through infrared sensors to prevent light-induced variations in activity. Each rat was gently placed in the center of the arena and allowed to explore freely for 10 minutes. Total distance traveled, immobility duration, and rearing activity were automatically automatically detected and quantified. After each trial, the arena was thoroughly cleaned with a non-scented disinfectant to eliminate any odors, fecal traces, or urine residues that could influence the subsequent animal’s behavior.
Elevated Plus Maze (EPM)
Anxiety-like behavior was further evaluated using the EPM test. The maze consisted of two open arms and two closed arms, each 10 cm wide and 1 m in length, intersecting at a central platform elevated above the floor. After each test session, the apparatus was cleaned to prevent odor-related bias. The time spent in open and closed arms, as well as the number of entries into open arms, was recorded for 5 minutes using EthoVision XT 10.0 video-tracking software.
Tissue Collection
Twenty-four hours after the final administration, all rats were sacrificed under moderate sevoflurane anesthesia (Sevorane®; Queenborough, UK), and brain tissues were collected for biochemical and molecular analyses. A portion of the brain tissue was gently rinsed with physiological saline and fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for histopathological and immunohistochemical examinations. The remaining tissues were again rinsed with physiological saline, rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at − 80°C until further biochemical and molecular analyses were performed.
Biochemical Analyses
Oxidative, antioxidant, and inflammatory parameters—including malondialdehyde (MDA), superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione (GSH), and the cytokines TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, and IL-10—were quantified spectrophotometrically using a BioTek EPOCH2 microplate reader at a wavelength of 450 nm. Brain tissues were homogenized in ice-cold phosphate buffer, centrifuged, and the resulting supernatants were analyzed. All biochemical measurements were normalized to gram of tissue to ensure accurate comparison across samples.
Histopathological Examinations
Brain samples collected at the end of the experiment were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 48 hours and subsequently processed through routine tissue preparation procedures before being embedded in paraffin blocks. Sections of 4 µm thickness were obtained from each block, stained with hematoxylin–eosin (H&E), and examined under a light microscope (Leica, Flexacam i5). Histopathological evaluation focused on detecting neuronal degeneration and necrosis in the cerebral cortex. Observed alterations were graded semi-quantitatively according to severity as absent (−), mild (+), moderate (++), or severe (+++) [16].
Immunohistochemical Examinations
For immunohistochemical analyses, tissue sections mounted on adhesive (poly-L-lysine–coated) slides following routine tissue processing were deparaffinized and rehydrated. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by incubating the sections in 3% H₂O₂ for 10 minutes. Antigen retrieval was then performed by heating the tissues in 1% TRIS-EDTA buffer (pH 6.1, 100X), followed by cooling to room temperature. To prevent nonspecific background staining, the sections were incubated with a protein block for 5 minutes. Subsequently, primary antibodies—BDNF (Cat. No: DF6387, dilution 1:100, Affinity) and GFAP (Cat. No: ab7260, dilution 1:100, Abcam)—were applied and incubated according to the manufacturers’ instructions. After the application of secondary antibodies, 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole (AEC) chromogen was applied for visualization. Stained sections were examined under a light microscope (Leica, Flexacam i5). Following microscopic evaluation, ImageJ software was used to quantify immunopositive staining intensity [17].
Immunofluorescence Examinations
For immunofluorescence analysis, tissue sections mounted on adhesive (poly-L-lysine–coated) slides were deparaffinized and rehydrated. Antigen retrieval was performed by heating the sections in 1% citrate buffer (pH 6.1, 100X), followed by cooling to room temperature. To reduce nonspecific background staining, the sections were incubated with a protein block for 5 minutes. Primary antibodies—BAX (Cat. No: sc-7480, mouse monoclonal, 1:100), Bcl-2 (Cat. No: sc-7382, mouse monoclonal, 1:100), and Caspase-3 (Cat. No: sc-56053, mouse monoclonal, 1:100)—were then applied and incubated according to the manufacturers’ protocols. After primary incubation, a fluorescent secondary antibody, fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC; Cat. No: sc-2359, mouse monoclonal, 1:1000), was applied and the sections were kept in the dark for 45 minutes. Subsequently, mounting medium containing 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Cat. No: ab104140, 1:200) was added, and the sections were incubated for 5 minutes in the dark before coverslipping. The stained tissues were examined under a fluorescence microscope equipped with appropriate fluorescence attachments (Zeiss AXIO, Germany) [18].
Western Blot Analyses
Western blot analysis was conducted to determine protein expression levels in brain tissues. Approximately 50 mg of brain tissue was homogenized in RIPA lysis buffer supplemented with a protease inhibitor cocktail (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-24948, USA), followed by centrifugation at 16,000 g for 20 minutes at + 4°C to obtain the supernatants. Total protein concentrations were quantified using the BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Scientific, Pierce BCA, 23225, USA) based on a BSA standard curve. Equal amounts of protein were separated by SDS-PAGE using acrylamide/bis-acrylamide solution (Bio-Rad, 161 − 0156, USA) under reducing conditions. Proteins were transferred onto PVDF membranes (Bio-Rad, 162–0177, USA) using a wet transfer system, after which membranes were blocked in TBST containing 5% non-fat dry milk. Membranes were then incubated overnight at + 4°C with primary antibodies targeting GRP78 (≈ 55–90 kDa, sc-13539), IRE1α (≈ 90–132 kDa, sc-390960), XBP1 (≈ 20–37 kDa, sc-8015), PERK (≈ 130–200 kDa, sc-377400), CHOP (≈ 23–34 kDa, sc-7351), ATF4 (≈ 45–55 kDa, sc-390063), and β-Tubulin (≈ 45–55 kDa, sc-5274). β-Tubulin served as the internal loading control.
Following primary incubation, membranes were washed and incubated with HRP-conjugated Goat anti-Mouse IgG-HRP secondary antibody (1:1000, sc-2005, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA). Protein bands were visualized using Clarity™ Western ECL Substrate (Bio-Rad, 170–5061, USA) and imaged using the ChemiDoc™ Imaging System (Bio-Rad, USA). Densitometric quantification of band intensities was performed in Image Lab 6.1 software, and target protein expression levels were normalized to β-Tubulin.
qRT-PCR Analyses
Primers required to quantify the mRNA transcript levels of Beclin-1, LC3A, and LC3B genes were designed using the Primer-BLAST tool (Table 1).
Table 1
Gene | Sequences (5’-3’) | Accession No |
|---|
LC3A | F: GACCATGTTAACATGAGCGA R: CCTGTTCATAGATGTCAGCG | NM_199500.2 |
LC3B | F: GAGCTTCGAACAAAGAGTGG R: CGCTCATATTCACGTGATCA | NM_022867.2 |
Beclin-1 | F: TCTCGTCAAGGCGTCACTTC R: CCATTCTTTAGGCCCCGACG | NM_053739.2 |
B-actin | F: CAGCCTTCCTTCCTGGGTATG R: AGCTCAGTAACAGTCCGCCT | NM_031144.3 |
Total RNA was extracted from 100 mg of brain tissue using QIAzol Reagent (QIAGEN, USA). Tissue samples were homogenized in 1 mL of QIAzol, followed by phase separation with 200 µL chloroform and centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 20 minutes at 4°C. The upper aqueous phase was mixed with 500 µL isopropanol and centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 10 minutes to precipitate RNA. The resulting pellet was washed with 75% ethanol, recentrifuged at 7,500 × g for 5 minutes, air-dried, and dissolved in RNase-free DEPC-treated water. RNA concentration and purity were determined spectrophotometrically at 260/280 nm, and samples with A260/280 ratios between 1.8 and 2.2 were used for subsequent analyses.
To eliminate genomic DNA contamination, total RNA was treated with DNase I (Thermo Scientific, USA). A total of 1 µg RNA per sample was reverse-transcribed into cDNA using the miScript Reverse Transcription Kit (QIAGEN, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Synthesized cDNA was quantified spectrophotometrically, diluted to equal working concentrations, and used for quantitative real-time PCR.
qRT-PCR was performed using a QIAGEN Real-Time PCR System with SYBR Green 2X Rox Master Mix (QIAGEN, USA). Each reaction was carried out in triplicate and included gene-specific primers (Beclin-1, LC3A, LC3B) together with β-actin as the housekeeping reference gene. The thermal cycling conditions consisted of an initial activation at 95°C for 10 minutes, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 15 seconds, annealing at 60°C for 30 seconds, and extension at 72°C for 30 seconds. Melt-curve analysis was performed to verify amplification specificity (Table 1).
Gene expression levels were calculated using the 2^−ΔΔCt method after normalization to β-actin [19].
Statistical Analysis
All data were expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). The normality of data distribution was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. For normally distributed variables (biochemical, behavioral, immunohistochemical, and immunofluorescence measurements), group differences were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. Non-normally distributed data, including H&E histopathological scores, were evaluated using the Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison test. To minimize type I error related to multiple testing across numerous outcome variables, the false discovery rate (FDR) approach (Benjamini–Hochberg procedure) was applied where appropriate. All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 9.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA), and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.