This study provides the largest and most detailed report on the characteristics of CML in Yemen to date, offering crucial insights from a resource-limited setting. Our findings reveal a distinct epidemiological and clinical profile compared to data from Western countries.
The most striking finding is the median age at diagnosis of 43.4 years. This is approximately two decades younger than the median age of 64-66 years reported in the United States and Europe [5, 6]. Our results are, however, consistent with observations from other developing countries, such as India (median age ~35 years) and Pakistan [7, 11]. This significant age difference suggests the influence of genetic, environmental, or socioeconomic factors that may lead to earlier disease onset in our population. The younger age at diagnosis has profound implications for long-term management, productivity loss, and healthcare resource allocation in Yemen. Table 3 and Figure 3 provide a comparative overview.
Table 3: Comparison of Median Age at CML Diagnosis
|
Study (Region)
|
Median Age (years)
|
|
Current study (Yemen)
|
43.4
|
|
Lokesh et al. (India) [8]
|
35
|
|
Kalmanti et al. (Europe) [12]
|
54
|
|
Jabbour et al. (USA) [1]
|
64
|
|
SEER Registry (USA) [6]
|
66
|
The clinical presentation in our cohort was characterized by advanced disease features, with marked leukocytosis (mean 129.8 ×10⁹/L), high prevalence of anemia (77.1%), and splenomegaly (90.3%). These findings suggest that patients in Yemen often present late in the disease course, likely due to a combination of low public awareness, limited access to primary healthcare, and socioeconomic barriers. Despite this, it is noteworthy that all patients were diagnosed in the chronic phase, which is a testament to the diagnostic capability of the tertiary center and offers a crucial window for effective therapeutic intervention.
The successful implementation of RT-PCR for BCR-ABL1 detection, with a high confirmation rate of 94.3%, underscores the feasibility and critical importance of molecular diagnostics even in resource-constrained environments. This molecular confirmation is the cornerstone of modern CML management, as it confirms eligibility for targeted therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) [1, 9]. The 5.7% of patients who were BCR-ABL1-negative despite a CML-like morphology highlight the importance of molecular testing to differentiate classic CML from other Ph-negative myeloproliferative or myelodysplastic neoplasms, which have different prognoses and treatment pathways.
The distribution of BCR-ABL1 transcript types in our cohort (64.2% e14a2, 33.9% e13a2) aligns with global data, where e14a2 is typically more common [16, 17]. Recent evidence suggests that transcript type may have prognostic implications, with some studies reporting faster molecular responses in e14a2-positive patients [17]. However, the clinical significance of transcript type remains debated, and current treatment guidelines do not recommend different management strategies based on transcript variants [18]. The low rate of co-expression of both transcripts (1.8%) in our cohort is consistent with published literature, which reports co-expression in 1-5% of CML cases [16].
While treatment outcome data were not available for this retrospective analysis, the successful implementation of molecular diagnostics in our center provides a foundation for future prospective studies. The International CML Foundation has emphasized the importance of establishing diagnostic infrastructure in resource-limited countries as a prerequisite for improving treatment outcomes [20]. Our experience demonstrates that high-quality molecular testing is feasible even in challenging settings, which is crucial given that BCR-ABL1 monitoring is essential for assessing treatment response and detecting resistance [18].
This study has several limitations. Its retrospective nature may have resulted in missing data. As a single-center study, it may not be representative of the entire country, although the hospital is a major national referral center. Furthermore, quantitative PCR for monitoring treatment response and sequencing for TKI resistance mutations were not available, representing a key area for future development.