Materials used in research
Cefditoren pivoxil (gifted from Vista Labs, Narketpally, Nalgonda), HPMC K100M, Guar gum, Microcrystalline cellulose (MCC), Talc, Magnesium stearate, Sodium bicarbonate, Citric acid, Hydrochloric acid, Ethyl cellulose, Dichlormethane, Ethanol and Polyvinyl alcohol (purchased from Alkem Laboratories, Hyderabad).
Experimental methodology:
1. Drug compatibility in preformulation study for Nanosponges:
The possibility of Cefditoren pivoxil interactions with selected polymers and other excipients was checked in preformulation studies to confirm drug compatibility in designed formulation blend. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopic method was opted for this study. The generated FTIR spectra for both pure drug and its physical blend with other excipients were analysed to interpret peak regions of characteristic groups. The presence of any deviations with characteristic peaks of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) in physical blend spectrum was noticed to know the status of drug compatibility.7,8
2. Preparation of Nanosponges for Cefditoren pivoxil:
In this research, API has been entrapped in nanosponge mesh like structures using ‘Emulsion solvent diffusion’ method. The main experimental process that has been executed to get nanosponge forms is a controlled and dropwise addition of internal (dispersed) phase to external (aqueous) phase. The polymeric materials selected for this nano-formulation were Ethyl cellulose (EC) and Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA). EC was mixed with Cefditoren pivoxil at the ratio of 1:5 (drug to polymer) as it has been proved to be best optimized combination with promising results in previous literature.7,8 A blend of Cefditoren pivoxil (50 mg) and Ethyl cellulose (250 mg) was solubilized in an organic solvent mixture (20 ml) containing Dichlormethane and Ethanol in 1:1 ratio. A complete dispersed phase was obtained by enabling the complete dissolution of EC and drug in solvent blend. A practice of complete dissolution of Polyvinyl alcohol (500 mg) in distilled water (100 ml) was executed to obtain external phase. Then a slow addition of dispersed phase to external phase was implemented during stirring at 1000 rpm using a magnetic stirrer. The wet product was obtained through filtration of resultant mixture which has been previously homogenized for 2 hours. Hot air oven was opted to dry the filtration residue at 40˚C for 24 hours and dried drug loaded nanosponges were collected. Solvent traces, if any from the resulted nanosponges were eradicated by placing them in vacuum desiccator.7
3. Characterization of drug loaded Nanosponges
A) Experimental yield:
Experimentally produced nanosponges were weighed and compared with formulation theoretical mass to get production yield using below formula:

Practical weight was obtained by noting the mass of completely dried NS forms. The sum of individual weights of both drug and polymer was taken as theoretical weight.7,8
B) Drug entrapment efficiency:
Crushed powder of drug loaded nanosponges (weight equivalent to dose) was obtained by triturating them in a mortar using pestle. Ethanol (50 ml) was used to suspend the resultant for 24 hours and collected the filtrate after filtration of uniformly mixed suspension. Then scanning of duly diluted filtrate was executed in UV-Visible spectrophotometer to get the absorbance at λmax of 241 nm. Then drug’s calibration curve was used to calculated the amount of Cefditoren pivoxil entrapped in NS formulation. Drug entrapment efficiency in prepared NS forms was estimated using below mentioned equation:7,8

C) Particle size:
Aqueous dispersion of prepared NS product was scanned in Brookhaven instrument which works on dynamic light scattering principle to get mean size of drug loaded nanosponges.7–9
D) Compatibility analysis using FTIR method:
FTIR spectra of both pure Cefditoren pivoxil and NS forms were produced. The presence of characteristic peak regions that have been noticed in pure drug spectrum were searched in spectrum of nanosponges. This analysis enabled the prediction of drug interactions with other formulative ingredients incorporated to prepare nanosponges. Disc shaped pellet was prepared for each sample by mixing it with KBr and then scanned in FTIR instrument to get spectrum.8
4. Drug compatibility in preformulation study for Floating tablets:
The compatibility of Cefditoren pivoxil with polymers and other excipients used in tablet formulation blends, was confirmed using Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopic method as a part of preformulation studies for floating dosage forms. Spectra were generated for two types of physical blends i.e. i) Blend having pure drug, polymers and other excipients ii) Mixture containing NS form of API, polymers and other ingredients. The analysis of generated FTIR spectra for both pure drug and its physical blends was carried out to interpret peak regions of characteristic groups. The status of drug compatibility was known by identifying the presence of any deviations with characteristic API peaks in spectra of physical blends.7,8
5. Preparation of Floating tablets
In this research, preparation of floating matrix tablets has been done using two separate approaches. In one approach, pure Cefditoren pivoxil was used as an API, whereas in other, pure medicament has been replaced with Nanosponge form of drug. Preparation of tablets was executed using direct compression method. Homogeneous mixing of all the ingredients like pure drug or NS form, MCC, rate controlling polymer and effervescent materials i.e. sodium bicarbonate, citric acid was done in a polybag. Then lubrication of resulted blend was done with magnesium stearate and talc before compression on eight station rotary punching machine using 9 mm flat faced punches (Table 1).10
Table 1
Formulation composition of Cefditoren pivoxil floating tablets
| Formulative Ingredients (mg) | Formulation Code |
| F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | F6 | F7 | F8 |
| Cefditoren pivoxil (pure) | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | - | - | - | - |
| Cefditoren pivoxil (as NS forms) | - | - | - | - | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 |
| HPMC K100M | 200 | 250 | - | - | 200 | 250 | - | - |
| Guar Gum | - | - | 200 | 250 | - | - | 200 | 250 |
| MCC | 132.5 | 82.5 | 132.5 | 82.5 | 132.5 | 82.5 | 132.5 | 82.5 |
| Citric acid | 37.5 | 37.5 | 37.5 | 37.5 | 37.5 | 37.5 | 37.5 | 37.5 |
| NaHCO3 | 150 | 150 | 150 | 150 | 150 | 150 | 150 | 150 |
| Mg. Stearate | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| Talc | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
6) Evaluation of prepared gastroretentive tablets
A) Characterization for physicochemical properties: In-vitro methods were applied to perform the evaluation tests like weight variation, hardness, thickness, friability and drug content as per reported methodology in literature.
10 The compliance of obtained results with pharmacopoeial limits was confirmed after their thorough checking and comparison with standards.
B) Floating properties: Buoyant properties were predicted in 0.1 N HCl (pH 1.2) medium. Estimation of floating lag-time and log-time values was carried out for buoyancy characterization of prepared dosage forms. A beaker (1 litre capacity) containing 900 ml of medium was used for these tests. A dosage unit was placed in medium in which it sinks to bottom instantly and floating lag-time was recorded by noting the time taken by tablet to float on surface of liquid. The duration of buoyancy for this floated tablet after its lag-time was noted as floating log-time.10
C) In-vitro dissolution study: Simulated gastric fluid i.e. 900 ml 0.1N HCl (pH 1.2) at 37˚C temperature was opted as medium to estimate the percentage of drug released from floating matrix dosage units. USP type-II (paddle) apparatus was used for this in-vitro testing. The speed of paddle rotation was maintained at 50 rpm. This dissolution test was performed up to 12 hours & the periodic time points to collect 5 ml sample during study were at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 12-hour. UV-Visible spectrophotometer was used for scanning of collected samples at λmax of 210 nm and absorbances were recorded. API’s calibration curve was used to calculate the cumulative % of drug release at each time point with obtained absorbance values.11
D) Drug release kinetics and mechanism: Fitting the obtained in-vitro drug release data into different equations of zero order, first order and Higuchi, Korsmeyer-Peppas, Hixson-Crowel models & plotting the relevant linear curves, has enabled the confirmation of release-kinetics and release-mechanism of medicament from polymer matrix. The obtained regression values (R2) of every straight line were compared to select the best fit linear curve with highest value and that selected respective model was used to explain the drug release kinetics and mechanism.10,11
E) FTIR analysis of best formulation for drug compatibility: FTIR analytical method was opted to check the possibility of drug interaction with other excipients in selected best formulation. The dosage unit was converted to powder by grinding it in a mortar. The ground tablet powder was mixed with KBr to prepare it as disc shaped pellet and scanned in spectrophotometer to get spectrum. The characteristic peaks of pure drug (as found in API spectrum) were verified in resulted spectrum for their presence and deviations to confirm the status of compatibility.10–12