3.1. Early CMI exposure disrupts sexual behavior in female rats
a) Proceptive behavior
Female adult rats exposed to CMI in postnatal period do not exhibit differences in hops between treatments [F (1, 40) = 0.73, p = 0.41, NS] nor during the sessions of sexual behavior evaluation [F (4, 40) = 0.00, p = 1.0, NS]. Moreover, the interaction of postnatal treatment x session was not significant [F (4, 40) = 0.97, p = 0.43, NS], see Fig. 1a. Regarding to darts behavior, statistical analysis did not found differences neither between treatments [F (1, 40) = 0.08, p = 0.78, NS] nor during sessions [F (4, 40) = -0.00, p = 1.0, NS]. Also, the postnatal treatment x session interaction was not significant [F (4, 40) = 0.28, p = 0.88, NS], see Fig. 1b.
Insert Fig. 1 about here
b) Receptive behavior
Figure 2 shows the effect of CMI postnatal treatment on adult female in five consecutive sessions of sexual behavior. The one-way RM ANOVA did not reach differences between the treatments [F (1, 40) = 0.01, p = 0.90, NS] or during the sessions [F (4, 40) = -0.00, p = 1.0, NS]. Moreover, the treatment x session interaction was not significant [F (4, 40) = 0.05, p = 0.99, NS].
Insert Fig. 2 about here
Regarding the intensity of lordosis (Fig. 3), the two-way RM ANOVA analysis showed differences between groups [F (1, 40) = 14.41, p < 0.0004]. The Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc indicated that CMI rats display less lordosis reflex during the ten mounts performed by the male rat compared with control rat (p < 0.05). The lordosis factor was also significant [F (3, 40) = 10.36, p < 0.00003], regardless the group, rats did not display lordosis or present normal lordosis compared marginal and exaggerated lordosis (SNK, p < 0.05). Moreover, the treatment x lordosis interaction was significant [F (3, 40) = 3.11, p < 0.03]. The post hoc test indicated that CMI group fail to display lordosis behavior (L0) in most of the times that the male rat was mounted. The rest of the times they showed normal (L2), exaggerated (L3) and marginal lordosis (L1). On the contrary, control rats tended to have L2 and L3 rather than L1 or L0 (Fig. 3a). Additionally, the interaction between sessions and lordosis was significant [F(12, 160) = 4.22, p = 0.00001]. Despite the treatment, during the first session rats did not show lordosis in most of the contacts with the male, but as many of sessions as less L0 rats shows, particularly in session 4 whilst in the last session rats returned to their basal condition. In contrast, during the first session, rats performed less normal lordosis or L2, but intensity was increased as the sessions advanced, with the fourth session being the maximum expression of L2. Moreover, a slight increase of L3 lordosis was observed in the second and third sessions; meanwhile, L1 lordosis did not change during the sessions (SNK p > 0.05), see Fig. 3b.
Insert Fig. 3 about here
3.2. Effect of CMI postnatal treatment on reproductive organs
a) Morphometric analysis of the ovaries
Figure 4 showed the effect of CMI postnatal treatment on the ovarian follicle in the ovary. The t-test analysis indicated that CMI rats have fewer number of total follicles compared to control rats [t = 5.190, gl = 7, p < 0.001]. These significant reduction in the number of follicles is due to the reduction in primordial [t = 4.813, gl = 7, p < 0.002] and primary follicles [t = 7.188, gl = 7, p < 0.001] in rats exposed to CMI in early life. Also, although it is not significant, we observed a tendency to have fewer secondary follicles in CMI rats compared to the control group [t = 2.114, gl = 7, p = 0.072, NS]. No statistical differences were found in the number of antral follicles [t = 1.697, gl = 7, p = 0.133, NS] and corpora lutea [t = 0.542, gl = 7, p = 0.604, NS] between groups.
Insert Fig. 4 about here
As shows in Table 1, no differences were found in the perimeter of primordial [t = − 0.640, gl = 7, p = 0.542, NS], primary [t = 1.450, gl = 7, p = 0.190, NS], secondary [t = 1.961, gl = 7, p = 0.091, NS] and antral [t = -0.082, gl = 7, p = 0.937, NS] follicles between groups. Likewise, no statistical differences were found in the diameter of primordial [t = -1.681, gl = 7, p = 0.137, NS], primary [t = -0.099, gl = 7, p = 0.353, NS], secondary [t = 1.373, gl = 7, p = 0.212, NS] and antral [t = -0.599, gl = 7, p = 0.568, NS] follicles between CMI and control rats.
Table 1
Perimeter and diameter (m) of ovarian follicles in control and CMI rats
µ |
|---|
| | Perimeter | Diameter |
|---|
Follicular stage | Control | CMI | Control | CMI |
Primordial follicle | 377.85 ± 9.95 | 385.22 ± 2.62 | 120.20 ± 3.38 | 126.80 ± 0.94 |
Primary follicles | 975.12 ± 41.68 | 887.20 ± 43.22 | 321.87 ± 14.00 | 299.95 ± 17.41 |
Secondary follicle | 975.12 ± 41.68 | 887.20 ± 43.22 | 798.01 ± 70.91 | 675.78 ± 43.42 |
Antral follicle | 4885.14 ± 630.41 | 4959.00 ± 616.90 | 1638.15 ± 214.90 | 1466.44 ± 172.11 |
All values are shown as mean ± SEM. CMI: clomipramine |
Insert Table 1 about here
b) Morphometric analysis of the uterus
Regarding the diameter of the uterus, no differences were found in endometrium [t = -1.49, gl = 7, p = 0.17], myometrium [t = -1.16, gl = 7, p = 0.28] and perimetrium diameter [t = -0.89, gl = 7, p = 0.40] compared to control rats. Moreover, statistical analysis indicated no differences in the endometrium [t = 0.47, gl = 7, p = 0.64], myometrium [t = 0.93, gl = 7, p = 0.38] and perimetrium thickness [t = 1.91 gl = 7, p = 0.09] in comparison with control group, see Fig. 5.
Insert Fig. 5 about here