This study was approved by the institutional review board of xxx Training and Research Hospital (date: 28.02.2024, number: 2024/241) and adheres to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from each subject. After approval by the Institutional Review Board, 30 patients who applied to the Urology Department of Buca Seyfi Demirsoy Training and Research Hospital and were diagnosed with erectile dysfunction and 30 age-matched healthy volunteers were enrolled in this study. In the urology department, the diagnosis was made by the same urologist (T.T.) by evaluating the IIEF-15 questionnaire. The questionnaire has 15 questions that assess five domains: erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire, intercourse satisfaction, and overall satisfaction. Through the IIEF-15 questionnaire, erectile dysfunction can be graded based on the erectile function domain. An erectile function score in the range of 26–30 is defined as no erectile dysfunction, a score in the range of 22–25 is defined as mild erectile dysfunction, a score in the range of 17–21 is defined as mild to moderate, a score in the range of 11–16 is defined as moderate, and a score in the range of 6–10 is defined as severe erectile dysfunction [3]. All information regarding the domains was recorded. In addition, the patients' testosterone levels were recorded.
To minimize potential confounding factors, stringent exclusion criteria were applied. Patients with established diagnoses of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or coronary artery disease were excluded from participation. Additionally, individuals with other systemic pathologies potentially affecting retinal or choroidal structures, or conditions that might alter ocular hemodynamics, such as smoking, were excluded. Patients undergoing any topical or systemic pharmacotherapy were similarly excluded. Ocular exclusion criteria encompassed any pathological conditions that could compromise measurement accuracy, including significant cataract, glaucoma, congenital or acquired retinal abnormalities, refractive errors exceeding ± 3 diopters, nystagmus, and corneal opacities. Furthermore, individuals with a history of ocular surgical intervention or trauma were excluded from participation.
The control group consisted of age-matched healthy individuals who presented to our ophthalmology outpatient clinic for routine ophthalmic evaluation during the study period. Potential control subjects underwent consecutive screening for eligibility based on the study's inclusion and exclusion parameters. Those who fulfilled all criteria and provided informed consent were enrolled as controls. Meticulous attention was directed toward ensuring demographic concordance between the control and erectile dysfunction cohorts to minimize potential confounding variables.
All patients incuded in the study, initially were performed a detailed ophthalmological examination including best corrected visual acuity determination with the Snellen chart, intraocular pressure measurement with applanation tonometry and anterior-posterior segment evaluation with slit-lamp biomicroscopy. After the examination, SD-OCT (DRI-OCT Triton, Topcon, Inc, Tokyo, Japan) images were taken to evaluate RNFL thickness values in 4 quadrants and GCL thickness values in 6 quadrants. EDI-OCT mode was preferred to measure SFCT and calculate CVI. To avoid diurnal variations, all EDI-OCT scans were performed at the same time of day, between 10:00 and 12:00, for each patient and the volunteer group. Two blinded physicians (P.K. and O.K.) conducted the SFCT measurements. The mean value of the two measurements was calculated, and the differences between the readings of the blinded physicians were found to be within 10 µm of the mean. In the event that the measurements differed by more than 10 µm, they were repeated. The inter-examiner reproducibility of the subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) measurements was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
To evaluate the RNFL and GCL thickness values in each group, SD-OCT device’s automatic calculation and reporting system was used, and the thickness values of 4 quadrants (superior, temporal, inferior and nasal) for RNFL, and 6 quadrants (superior, superotemporal, superonasal, inferior, inferotemporal, and inferonasal) for GCL were recorded.
For CVI analysis, the SD-OCT images through the fovea were selected for image binarization and segmented according to the protocol described by Agrawal et al [15] using Image J version 1.53 a (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). The polygon selection tool helped to detect the total choroidal area (TCA) between the retinal pigment epithelium and the choroid-scleral junction for the subfoveal region within a width of 1500 µm (750 µm either side of the fovea). Regions of interest (ROIs) were added to the ROI manager. After the image was converted to 8-bit, a Niblack autolocal thresholding tool was applied. This tool helped to obtain the mean pixel value with standard deviation (SD) for all points. The luminal area (LA) was defined using the color thresholding tool and was also added to the ROI manager. To determine the area of vascularity within the selected polygon, both areas were selected in the ROI manager and merged using an "AND" operation. The CVI value was defined as the ratio of LA to TCA.
In addition, the correlations between the SD-OCT measurements and the IIEF-15 results (erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire, intercourse satisfaction, and overall sexual satisfaction) and total testosterone levels were analyzed.
Statistical Analysis
IBM The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 25 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical purposes. Categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages, and numerical variables were expressed as means and standard deviations. Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests were used to determine whether the data were normally distributed. Independent t-test was used to evaluate differences in normally distributed data. Mann-Whitney U test was used to determine differences in non-normally distributed data. Pearson's correlation test and Spearman's correlation test were used to examine correlations in both normally and non-normally distributed data. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. For statistical purposes, values from the left eyes were analyzed in both the study and control groups. The sample size was calculated based on the findings of a previous study by Kim et al. (6), which observed that the Small Choroidal Vessel Layer (SCVL) thickness in patients with erectile dysfunction (ED) was significantly thinner than in the control group (control: 69.8 ± 24.3 µm vs. ED: 55.1 ± 19.9 µm; p = 0.017). The G*Power program was used for the sample size calculation. A 95% confidence interval and 80% power were targeted to detect a significant difference between the two groups. For 80% power (effect size: 0.5, alpha error probability: 0.05), the minimum required sample size was determined to be 26 patients.