The natural gas used for the experiments originates from the Karlsruhe city grid. To determine the composition, a gas chromatograph (GC) is used to analyse the concentrations of certain species in the natural gas. In this case, the natural gas consists of almost 94% methane and also contains relevant proportions of ethane (~ 4%), propane, and butane. (Table 6). In addition, the natural gas can also contain components that cannot be detected but which may impact the catalyst, such as sulphur. The fuel composition has an influence not only on the catalyst but also on the combustion process itself, which is why the methane number and the calorific values are calculated with the help of the measured concentrations.
A decisive factor for a reliable and efficient performance of tests in the context of exhaust gas aftertreatment is the adjustment of the test conditions. In catalysis, these are strongly influenced by the space velocity. In fluctuating operation, as is the case on an engine test bench (Fig. 5), manual adjustment would be very difficult and would require considerable effort, hence in this case a control concept (Chap. 2.2) must be developed. Since, as already explained in Chap. 2.1.2, many fluctuating measured variables are necessary for calculating the GHSV, there are quickly occurring and changing deviations to which a PID controller reacts sensitively, making the adjustment of the individual control components essential. In addition to the parameterisation of the controller, the input variables play an important role as well. Usually, space velocities are specified in 1/h and reach orders of magnitude of 105 1/h in engine applications. A control system that would have to control to the exact reference value could be overtaxed quickly, which is why in the control architecture described here the setpoint and actual values are rounded to the 1000s digit and transferred as input variables to the control system. On average, this results in a deviation between the setpoint and actual value of approx. 0.1% (Table 7).
3.1.1 Exhaust Gas Species
In the following, the results of the concentration measurements conducted for all operation points listed in Table 3 are examined in more detail, broken down by the individual species or species groups.
Under lean conditions, a late adjustment of the ignition timing from 50% Mass Fraction Burned (MFB50 = 8°CA to MFB50 = 19°CA) leads to a slight reduction of the CH4 raw emission level and an increase of the exhaust temperature by 30°C. (Table 8) Despite the increasing exhaust temperature, the CH4 conversion rate over the catalyst remains almost constant at approx. 80%. Similar trends are observed under stoichiometric conditions, however, with overall higher exhaust temperatures of up to 663°C, lower raw emissions, and a lower CH4 conversion of approx. 70%. The positive impacts of higher temperatures seem to be compensated by the higher water amount at altered ignition timing (except one outlier) and its increasing inhibitory effects (Gélin et al. 2003, Gholami et al. 2015). Gremminger et al. reported that Pd-based catalysts are most active in lean exhausts, whereas they exhibit only moderate CH4 conversion in stoichiometric exhausts (Gremminger et al. 2020). Our present findings join the latter corpus of work, since the almost 90°C higher exhaust temperature during stoichiometric engine operation cannot compensate lower catalyst activity. Dilution of the air and fuel mixture with EGR (10%) at λ = 1 leads to an only minor increase in raw emissions compared to undiluted operation, but results in a slightly lower exhaust temperature and thus in a slight drop in CH4 conversion. Dilution by air or also EGR leads to lower combustion temperatures as well as a higher heat capacity of the gas mixture in the cylinder and thus to overall lower combustion chamber temperatures. Thus, the time window in which conditions prevail that benefit methane oxidation is smaller. In addition, the flame speed is reduced. For these reasons, there is less time for the fuel to burn through and more unburnt methane (quenching effects) enters the exhaust gas than in undiluted operation. The late adjustment of the ignition timing leads to a higher temperature at the end of the working cycle, which benefits catalytic CH4 oxidation. This temperature effect could also be observed by (Lehtoranta et al. 2021). The excess oxygen in lean operation favours the oxidation of unburnt methane in the catalytic converter but also promotes water inhibition, whereas in rich conditions various reactions have to compete for the remaining oxygen. Theoretically there is enough oxygen available but the methane conversion is lower due to lower catalytic activity of Pd-based catalysts (Gremminger et al. 2020). Furthermore, it must be taken into account that sulphur in the exhaust gas has a considerable influence on the quality of the catalysis which will be discussed later (Gremminger et al. 2017, Lott et al. 2024).
During lean operation, only minimal differences are shown with regard to the CO raw emissions with the ignition timing variation (Table 8). With later ignition, the emissions are slightly lower. With both ignition angles, the CO is almost completely eliminated by the catalytic converter. The raw emission level during dithering is significantly higher than in lean operation. With regard to the ignition timing adjustment, analogous effects are observed for stoichiometric and lean conditions. The CO conversion rate is reduced to slightly more than 70%. By using EGR the CO raw emissions are lower than in stoichiometric operation without EGR, but still significantly higher than in lean operation. The conversion rate is also just over 70%. In general, CO emissions indicate incomplete combustion, as the flame goes out especially near the wall or there may be a local lack of oxygen as a result of inhomogeneities in the combustion chamber. The late adjustment of the ignition timing leads to a longer combustion. Consequently, the temperatures required for combustion of the hydrocarbons in the fuel are also present for longer and under lean conditions there is thus more time for oxidation. Under stoichiometric or rich conditions, there are locally more areas of oxygen deficiency, so that the occurrence of incomplete combustion is favoured (Pischinger et al. 2009). The lack of oxygen in the exhaust gas also leads to an increase in emissions after the catalytic converter, as unburnt hydrocarbons cannot be completely oxidised to CO2 and H2O. It is well known from three-way catalysts that CO is converted well under lean conditions, but its conversion decreases under stoichiometric and rich conditions (Farrauto and Heck 1999, Raj 2016).
During lean operation a late adjustment of the ignition timing leads to a reduction in NO raw emissions due to the resulting later combustion and thus lower peak temperatures in the combustion chamber (Table 8). In addition, the late adjustment seems to result in a slight increase of the NO concentration measured after the catalyst sample. Under stoichiometric conditions, slightly more than half of the NO is converted by the catalyst. A later ignition under stoichiometric conditions shows the same effect as in the lean. However, the raw emission level is significantly higher due to the higher combustion temperatures, which means that the emissions after catalyst are even partly higher than the raw emissions under lean conditions. The use of EGR leads to a similar raw emission level as in lean, but shows the same conversion rate as without EGR. Peak combustion temperatures and excess oxygen play a decisive role in the formation of NO. The latter is also present globally under stoichiometric conditions without EGR due to lambda control and locally with the use of EGR due to incomplete mixing. In general, dilution increases the heat capacity and therefore lowers the peak temperatures during combustion. A late adjustment of the ignition leads to lower peak pressures and thus also to lower maximum temperatures, which also lowers the emissions. The temperature dependency of the NO formation in engines has been sufficiently researched. The main pathway in the engine context is the Zeldovich mechanism describing the NO formation under high temperatures. (Baulch et al. 1994, 2006, Pischinger et al. 2009, van Basshuysen 2015) In lean conditions, no conversion takes place in the catalyst (similar to three way catalysts (Farrauto and Heck 1999, Raj 2016) due to the lack of reducing agents and the inhibitory effect of oxygen on NO reduction that could be observed on Pd-based methane oxidation catalysts (Andersson et al. 2000). However, this changes in stoichiometric operation but with higher raw emissions so that it at least compensates for the increase in NO emissions due to the enrichment.
While operating lean at early ignition and thus lower exhaust gas temperatures, NO2 is formed (Table 8). A late adjustment, however, shows a trend reversal and an increase in the NO2 conversion rate over the catalyst. The raw emissions show no significant influence of the ignition timing. In contrast to lean conditions, the increase of post-catalyst concentration is significant, but is somewhat smaller with a late adjustment of the ignition. The use of EGR shows no difference compared to the measurements under stoichiometric conditions without EGR. The level of the raw emissions decreases significantly during lean operation and thus shows an opposite behaviour to NO. The excess oxygen in lean combustion favours the oxidation of NO to NO2, which is why the concentrations are higher than in stoichiometric engine operation. Although additional NO2 is produced in the catalytic converter due to NO oxidation also in stoichiometric exhausts, the engine-out NO2 levels are substantially lower and thus the post-catalyst NO2 concentrations always remain below those found under lean operation.
Traces of N2O (detection limit of the MG 2030 FTIR spectrometer according to the manufacturer at 0.75 ppm) are present especially after the catalytic converter at lean conditions. The late adjustment of the ignition and the associated higher temperatures seem to eliminate the N2O proportions in the raw exhaust almost completely (Table 8). Compared to lean conditions, the raw emission level is slightly increased and the production rate is significantly higher. The use of EGR shows no significant difference to the corresponding operating point without dilution.
In principle, there are two sources of N2O, one from combustion in the cylinder and the other from exhaust gas aftertreatment. In the formation of NO in the combustion chamber, the path via N2O plays an important role in Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition (HCCI) applications (Amnéus et al. 2005). Similar mechanisms could explain the occurrence in the raw exhaust gas. (Li et al. 2012) observed that incomplete combustion of n-heptane leads to an increase in concentrations in the order of magnitude observed here (approx. 1 ppm). The other source of N2O emissions are processes in the catalyst. Essentially, the following gross reactions play a role in the conversion, which depend on the catalyst composition, temperature and partial pressure of the individual components:

The first reaction is the desired reduction of NO by CO, the second describes the undesired formation of N2O. The decomposition of N2O with CO acting as a reducing agent is described by the third reaction, and the last one shows a simple dissociation that typically occurs once temperatures exceed 600°C. It was possible to identify a temperature at which N2O was no longer formed when syngas was fed to a three-way catalyst (Pd/Rh), independent of the fuel-air mixture, since it dissociates at this temperature. Furthermore, it was shown that only the front zone of the catalyst is important for conversion. N2O is formed during the incomplete reduction of NO, whereby CO or HC are possible reaction partners. This reaction is favoured by slight excess air, since CO and HC then react first with the atmospheric oxygen. Therefore, fewer CO and HC molecules remain for the reaction with NO than are required for complete reduction. N2O formation thereby outweighs the degradation mechanisms at catalyst temperatures of about 200°C to 400°C (Gifhorn and Meyer-Pitroff 1998).
At higher excess air, NO reduction and thus N2O formation becomes almost irrelevant. When there is a lack of air, N2O is formed. At higher temperatures, N2O degradation with CO or HC dominates (Hausberger 1999). In (Adams et al. 2015, Adams et al. 2016), the influence of lean-rich alternations on N2O formation was investigated. It was shown that N2O was formed mainly in the rich-lean alternations. Moreover, (Gifhorn and Meyer-Pitroff 1998) report on a maximum of N2O formation in slightly lean operation, which is related to the resulting increased NOx concentration. In the case of the stoichiometric experiments, the lambda oscillation with deflections into richness as well as the increased nitrogen oxide concentrations in the raw exhaust gas due to the higher combustion temperatures could thus have a reinforcing effect on the N2O formation in the catalytic converter. Significant leaning is shown to be a preventive measure. Despite the higher exhaust gas temperatures compared to 400°C discussed in (Gifhorn and Meyer-Pitroff 1998), the maximum temperature permitted for formation over the Pd/Al2O3 catalyst sample investigated in this publication seems not to be reached.
Under lean conditions, ammonia plays a role neither in raw nor post-catalyst emissions. (Table 8) In contrast, catalyst-induced ammonia formation is observed under stoichiometric conditions. Notably, a late adjustment of the ignition timing in the exhaust gas leads to a decrease in ammonia formation. In addition, EGR results in reduced ammonia formation in the catalytic converter compared to the pure stoichiometric point without EGR.
If H2 and NO are present in a certain ratio under stoichiometric conditions, ammonia is formed in precious metal catalysts according to the following reaction equation:
The reaction equation above underscores that in addition to NO, which is often contained in the exhaust gas, the presence of hydrogen is also necessary for ammonia formation. Hydrogen originates from the water contained in the exhaust gas, which reacts with CO according to the so-called water-gas shift reaction (WGS) (Adams et al. 2015):
-

In another study, a positive influence of the modification of Pd/Al2O3 with cerium on ammonia formation was observed when H2O serves as the H2 source, as this stimulates the WGS. The addition of barium instead of cerium, on the other hand, shows no influence (Adams et al. 2016). Note that NH3 forms only during rich phases when H2 evolving from WGS is not oxidized due to the lack of oxygen. Furthermore, in these phases, more nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide as well as water are available as required species. In this regard, the lower ammonia formation in case of a late adjustment of the ignition may be explained by the lower NOx content in the raw emissions.
At lean conditions, there is almost no influence of the ignition timing adjustment on the formaldehyde raw emission level (Table 8). The emissions under stoichiometric operation are almost completely converted by the catalyst. Compared to lean conditions, this results in a lower raw emission level, but barely impacts the conversion in the catalyst. The use of EGR results in lower raw emissions than in lean and is about the same level as in undiluted stoichiometric operation. Formaldehyde is an intermediate product in methane oxidation, hence its occurrence in exhaust gas suggests incomplete combustion (Mitchell and Olsen 2000, CIMAC WG17 2014). Consequently, increased formaldehyde emissions always occur along with increased methane emissions and thus the interpretations for raw methane emissions with regard to the influence of dilution by EGR as well as by air also apply in case of formaldehyde.
Regardless of the operating conditions, the Pd/Al2O3 catalyst used herein shows an almost complete conversion of the formaldehyde. In (Gremminger et al. 2020), various noble metal-based catalyst formulations including Pd-based samples were examined for their ability to oxidise formaldehyde under different (simulated) engine operating conditions. Irrespective of the catalyst composition, almost complete CH2O conversion was found for temperatures of 350°C and above. Since all measurements carried out in the present study are well above this temperature, high formaldehyde conversion rates are achieved. However, despite the high catalytic activity, few ppm of CH2O were detected post catalyst for all conditions tested, which we attribute to the strong transport limitation of formaldehyde oxidation over noble metal catalysts (Torkashvand et al. 2019, Wan et al. 2020).
In the engine context, SO2 is the product of combustion of sulphur-containing media that enter the combustion chamber. Gas engines that rely on natural gas or biogas as fuels usually contain sulphur. In the case of natural gas from the city grid, sulphur-containing odorants are added for safety reasons. According to analyses by the Karlsruhe municipal utility, there are about 5 ppm of sulphur in the natural gas used when it reaches the end consumer. Another source of raw SO2 emissions can be sulphur-containing engine oil. According to the oil analysis, the SAE40 engine oil used contains 0.14 mass % sulphur. As can be seen in Table 4, the concentrations are max. 4 ppm and thus below or at the detection limit of 4 ppm specified for the FTIR spectrometer used herein for gas analysis, which means that the absolute value should be viewed with caution. However, the pre- and post-catalyst measurements always show the same tendency, so that at least the direction of a change in concentration due to the catalyst can be reliably determined. The comparison between the emissions pre- and post-catalyst under lean conditions shows a repeating pattern. The SO2 level in the raw emissions is always lower than the SO2 level that is detected at post catalyst position (Table 8) The exhaust temperatures have no influence on this. Compared to lean conditions, SO2 is included in the raw emissions at stoichiometry. Emissions after catalyst are also increased. Just as in lean, a late adjustment of the ignition causes no change in the emissions. A minor influence with the addition of EGR is seen in the raw emissions, where the proportion is between the stoichiometrically undiluted and the lean in terms of amount.
As explained at the beginning, two possible sources play a role in SO2 formation in the combustion chamber. However, neither seems to play a role in lean-burn, whereas SO2 is present in the measurements under stoichiometric conditions. The difference between the two operating modes lies in the charging and thus the pressure in the cylinder. To realise the lean conditions, more air must be added with the help of boost pressure while maintaining the load. The cycle thus starts at a higher level than in uncharged operation during the stoichiometric measurements. When analysing the cylinder pressure curves, it was noticed that at the stoichiometric operating points the pressure is at times below ambient pressure, which sucks oil into the cylinder and therefore results in SO2 formation during combustion. Conversely, this also indicates that odorisation of the fuel itself plays an only minor role in SO2 formation, at least for the conditions subject to the present study.
According to the case that sulphation has already taken place, the increase in SO2 emissions after the catalytic converter under rich conditions could be due to regeneration. In (Lott et al. 2020) it was observed that SO2 is desorbed under rich conditions and in the presence of water vapour. The lower increase under lean conditions can possibly also be attributed to the same effects, only much more inhibited. In order to clarify this conclusively, experiments could be carried out under rich conditions without falling below the ambient pressure in the cylinder by means of charging. In this way, sulphur could be prevented from entering the exhaust gas through combustion of the engine oil and influencing the catalytic activity. Another reason for the increase could be an oxidation of sulphur species in the catalyst which cannot be quantified by the FTIR.