Preregistration in Animal Experimentation – A Qualitative Study on Researchers’ Views in Switzerland
The Ethical Dimension of Peer Review: Insights from Editors of Philosophy Journals in Spain
Possibilities for the peer review of interdisciplinary research: a small-scale qualitative study
Lost in Documentation: Professional Norms and the Gaps in Survey Translation Transparency
Gender imbalances of retraction prevalence among highly cited authors and among all authors
Speed of ethics and governance approvals in Australia before and after the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study
Enhancing reporting through structure: a before and after study on the effectiveness of SPIRIT-based templates to improve the completeness of reporting of randomized controlled trial protocols
A structured mentored review program improves the quality of peer review: a pre-post intervention study
Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other Large Language Models in scholarly peer review
A checklist to assess Trustworthiness in RAndomised Controlled Trials (TRACT checklist)
Learn more about Research Integrity and Peer Review