Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates
📽️ Media
|
Featured picture candidates Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Adding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate name, quality, image description, categories and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Nominations are time-sensitive and for one-time use only. An automatic clock starts as soon as they are created. Do not create them in advance, save them for later or re-activate them. Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using
An 'Alternative' is created by adding a sub-section to the nomination page: ====Alternative==== VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 100 constructive, stable edits on Commons (excluding user and talk pages) can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
| |||||||||||||||||||
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2026 at 10:18:50 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Uzbekistan
Info Magok-i-Attari Mosque, Buhara, Uzbekistan. UNESCO site. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 10:18, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Mile (talk) 10:18, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Crisp and angular lighting. The man on the left is a wee bit distracting . JayCubby (talk) 16:03, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 16:18, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2026 at 09:48:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Cemeteries#France
Info created by JackyM59 – uploaded by JackyM59 – nominated by JackyM59 -- JackyM59 (talk) 09:48, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- JackyM59 (talk) 09:48, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Weak support - I feel like a bit more breathing room would have benefitted the composition a lot. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:50, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice composition. --Laitche (talk) 12:56, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2026 at 09:03:15 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera/Nymphalidae#Genus : Charaxes
Info created by Anitava Roy – uploaded by Anitava Roy – nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 09:03, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Atudu (talk) 09:03, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Superb - JackyM59 (talk) 09:40, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Size of animal would be good to know. --Mile (talk) 10:04, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Excellent photograph. -- Kingshuk Mondal (talk) 10:21, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 12:50, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Though I wonder if a slightly tighter crop at the bottom (equidistant) and sides (for aspect ratio) would improve composition. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:53, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2026 at 02:57:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Rosales#Family : Moraceae
Info Flowers of Prunus mume (Armenaca mume ‘Setsugekka’) at Nagai Park. c/u/n by Laitche (talk) 02:57, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Laitche (talk) 02:57, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:53, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Beautiful and special! Radomianin (talk) 14:18, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Jan 2026 at 20:39:05 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Vietnam
Info created and uploaded by Dave Bunnell, nominated by Yann
Info Large stalagmites in the passage of Hang Sơn Đoòng in Vietnam. The tallest has been measured at 70 meters in height.
Support -- Yann (talk) 20:39, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Well-handled artificial lighting! JayCubby (talk) 21:18, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 03:02, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:32, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:43, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:58, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Jan 2026 at 11:32:00 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications/Germany#Baden-Württemberg
Info created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 11:32, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 11:32, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 13:18, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:02, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jan 2026 at 20:24:17 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#North Macedonia
Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 20:24, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 20:24, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support I like these kinds of pictures, and this is a good one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:13, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support It's nice to not see litter in places like this. Nice, classic compo. JayCubby (talk) 14:35, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
- I picked up some litter before taking this picture just to make sure it wouldn't be distracting, but it was generally cleaner than what one would expect for such an abandoned place. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:15, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment боји несе баш спец, на лево тоже изгорено. Пробај црно-бело. --Mile (talk) 14:38, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
- Tranalation:
- “The colors aren’t really anything special; on the left it’s also burned out. Try black-and-white.” JayCubby (talk) 15:52, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Alternative
Comment This is an alternative black-and-white version as suggested by Petar. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 19:15, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 19:43, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support this one too. JayCubby (talk) 20:17, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Awesome. Wolverine X-eye 21:16, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support I like both versions, and each one has a different feel. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:31, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mile (talk) 10:01, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support as creator and per Ikan's comment. Both versions are featurable on different merits. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:27, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:28, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:03, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jan 2026 at 18:47:28 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class_:_Anthozoa
Info Coral (Euphyllia ancora), Anilao, Philippines. Note: there are yet no FPs on Commons belonging to the family Euphylliidae, that contains at least 845 species. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 18:47, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 18:47, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Amazing! How big are the polyps? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:14, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Interesting subject, but a bit underexposed for my taste. What's the white streak in the bottom-middle
JayCubby (talk) 00:51, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
- I would also add more light. Yann (talk) 19:44, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
- I third this. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:06, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 13:19, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jan 2026 at 15:31:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Coraciiformes#Family_:_Meropidae_(Bee-eaters)
Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 15:31, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 15:31, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose A decent shot, but we have already better shots of this species in the FP gallery, like this one (among others). Poco a poco (talk) 15:52, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support I gotta say that's a superb shot. Wolverine X-eye 15:59, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support JackyM59 (talk) 16:17, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per Poco a poco —kallerna (talk) 17:29, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 17:44, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per Poco a poco – Julian Lupyan (talk) 18:18, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Now this crop is better. Good shot despite high ISO. Completely comparable with Charles shot. --Mile (talk) 20:09, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco is right that that photo is better than this one, but a cursory look at a few photos in the gallery seems to show that there are plenty of less sharp FPs of this bird. Therefore, I think the right thing to do is consider this excellent photo an FP and nominate some other FPs of this species for delisting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:21, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 07:25, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support I believe having more Fp's people get more image options to choose from, I don't understand why people are trying to limit it. - Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 08:35, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 19:45, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Ermell (talk) 20:20, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:26, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:30, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jan 2026 at 13:11:15 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Herpestidae_(Mongooses)
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:11, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:11, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Mongooses are apparently closer to felines than canines, but vulpine fits well. Great lighting and expression. JayCubby (talk) 14:35, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support - Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 15:17, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Lovely golden light. Wolverine X-eye 16:00, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support JackyM59 (talk) 16:15, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 17:36, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:44, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 17:45, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 18:18, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:48, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 20:19, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 21:31, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:24, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:33, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 07:25, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:29, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 08:37, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:02, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support per Wolverine. – Aristeas (talk) 19:15, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 02:43, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 06:55, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:30, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jan 2026 at 11:22:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus_:_Larus
Info A common gull (Larus canus) in flight – c/u/n by Alexis Lours -- Alexis Lours (talk) 11:22, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Alexis Lours (talk) 11:22, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Not so common a shot! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:17, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- Actually, not such a common gull.Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:55, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support JackyM59 (talk) 16:18, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Nice shot, but it's a common bird so I'm being picky: I find the background distracting. —kallerna (talk) 17:31, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 17:44, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support I feel the contrast in warmth between the colors of the right and left wing make the image very pleasant – Julian Lupyan (talk) 18:20, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Great photo of a bird in flight! I totally understand kallerna's opposition but feel that the excellence of the capture of the bird overrides such concerns, which I mean no disrespect in saying they feel petty to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:27, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 07:25, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:30, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support I hesitated when looking at the thumbnail, but when I view it in full size even the background works well for me. – Aristeas (talk) 19:17, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:24, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:29, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jan 2026 at 11:23:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Rallidae_(Coots,_Rails_and_Crakes)
Info A partially leucistic Eurasian coot (Fulica atra) walking on ice – c/u/n by Alexis Lours -- Alexis Lours (talk) 11:23, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Alexis Lours (talk) 11:23, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 11:44, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:34, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support DOF works well, good feather detail, cool coloration. The claws are quite a sight! JayCubby (talk) 15:05, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support - Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 15:18, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Decent shot. Wolverine X-eye 16:02, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support JackyM59 (talk) 16:16, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 17:39, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 17:46, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice capture. --BigDom (talk) 18:36, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:54, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Great picture. Looks mischievous! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:45, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:32, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support-- Ahad.F (talk) 04:07, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 07:26, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:31, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 08:37, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:00, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 19:13, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:14, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jan 2026 at 08:51:36 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Rail vehicles#United Kingdom
Info Jacobite Express on Glenfinnan Viaduct, Scotland. Сreated by Eric Kilby – uploaded/nominated by me Юрий Д.К. 08:51, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 08:51, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:21, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:35, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support - Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 15:18, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Impressive. Wolverine X-eye 16:03, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 17:41, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:45, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment There seems to be a bit of color noise when enlarged, especially on the front of the train and the background greenery – Julian Lupyan (talk) 18:11, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Done - denoised Юрий Д.К. 18:21, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Weak support Impressive architecture, lovely autumnal colours and a nice train. Shame about the level of detail—the high ISO and subsequent noise reduction are pretty evident—but it's a very nice scene nonetheless. --BigDom (talk) 18:39, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Scottish Highland magic. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:00, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 21:32, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Not perfect, but good enough. --Laitche (talk) 23:05, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Great to me, and I thought it was by Kabelleger until I looked at the author field. I take the point that many of Kabelleger's photos are more detailed, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:48, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 06:21, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 07:26, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:31, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 08:38, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:59, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:24, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Msb (talk) 17:59, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support per BigDom and Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 19:13, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:14, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jan 2026 at 04:26:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Brazil
Info created by Felipe Valduga – uploaded and nominated by Heylenny -- heylenny (talk/edits) 04:26, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- heylenny (talk/edits) 04:26, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose I believe it is just shy of the level of detail required. The background walls also have a bit of noise. – Julian Lupyan (talk) 18:31, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Not a bad photo but not an FP in my opinion. Attention to detail in the composition (e.g. chair leg cut off at the bottom, one light sconce hidden behind branches, ironwork spike just touching the top of the frame in the centre) and lack of life in the scene are the main issues for me. BigDom (talk) 18:45, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per BigDom and also because this is a nice but not obviously featurable scene and would require a really outstanding composition and execution for me to consider it an FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:02, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jan 2026 at 04:26:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors
Info created by Felipe Valduga – uploaded by HJGN2 – nominated by Heylenny -- heylenny (talk/edits) 04:26, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- heylenny (talk/edits) 04:26, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Attention to detail (light fixture on the left seemingly floating in midair, corner of the doorway cut off at bottom left) and boring light the main issues for me. --BigDom (talk) 19:00, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment It's also not a very attractive scene in certain ways, especially because the garbage bag is so prominently featured. That takes nothing away from the fact (to me) that it's a very good photo of a potentially featurable motif. I'm not sure whether it's an FP or not. I like the straight ahead view up the street very much. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:08, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Jan 2026 at 22:04:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Otariidae_(Eared_Seals)
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:04, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:04, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Expressive photo of great technical quality. I like the light coming in from the top-left. Are the colored stripes around the whiskers
chromatic aberration, camera artifacts, or processing artifacts? JayCubby (talk) 22:21, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Done, new file uploaded with CA fixed -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:05, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 02:57, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 04:30, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Great photo, but how do you know they're really fighting and not playing (play-fighting)? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:29, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- It's true that, at first sight, the one on the left seemed to want to play but the one one on the right was not happy about it and they bited each other in a quite agressive way and then the one from the right left so the whole scene looked more like a fight to me than playing. But since the photo was taken before the violent acts I could eventually rename the picture to change "seals fighting" to "seal wanting to play" but the thing is I'm not 100% sure the one on the left really wanted to play because it also looked like it was bullying the one from the right -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:05, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- The more I think about the scene the more the one from the left just seemed to be bullying the one from the right before their big violent bites so I don't think I will rename the file -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:46, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- Don't. You saw the whole scene. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:49, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- The more I think about the scene the more the one from the left just seemed to be bullying the one from the right before their big violent bites so I don't think I will rename the file -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:46, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- It's true that, at first sight, the one on the left seemed to want to play but the one one on the right was not happy about it and they bited each other in a quite agressive way and then the one from the right left so the whole scene looked more like a fight to me than playing. But since the photo was taken before the violent acts I could eventually rename the picture to change "seals fighting" to "seal wanting to play" but the thing is I'm not 100% sure the one on the left really wanted to play because it also looked like it was bullying the one from the right -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:05, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 11:40, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:22, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support - Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 15:18, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:24, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Interesting...Wolverine X-eye 16:05, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:03, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 17:42, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:46, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --BigDom (talk) 18:47, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:50, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:33, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support-- Ahad.F (talk) 04:22, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 07:27, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:32, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 08:38, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:58, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 12:21, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support per Jay. – Aristeas (talk) 19:11, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 03:10, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:12, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Jan 2026 at 19:38:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Others
Info Autumn leaves floating on the water of a little channel besides a water volcano in the Alameda dos Oceanos of the Parque das Nações, Lisbon, Portugal. Created and uploaded by Jules Verne Times Two, nominated by – Aristeas (talk) 19:38, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support I love many aspects of this photograph; it’s simple and complex at the same time. The autumn leaves (mostly oak leaves) appear to be carefully arranged, even if the arrangement is a work of chance. The light from the side nicely emphasizes their shapes and textures. The warm colours of the leaves contrast beautifully with the nuanced blue tones of the background; hence the hues of the image are diverse but harmonious. The leaves appear to hover above their shadow until we realize that they are floating on the clear water. So we have four levels: leaves, water, shadow, tiles, one of which – the water – is almost invisible. The shadow of the leaves echoes them and shows a luminous edge that gives the shadow a touch of three-dimensionality. Perhaps someone is offended by the many tiny things that appear on the surface of the water and as shadows on the tiles when zoomed in; but I think this is one of the rare cases in which dirt is important in a photo, because only these little things and their shadows make the water visible and show that this is a real photo and not a montage ;–). – Aristeas (talk) 19:38, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
- Aristeas, thank you for the nomination, and thank you for that beautiful description: it is a privilege to have someone studying one my images so intently. I remember this day well, I had just bought a new lens (recommended by you, incidentally!) and made my way to Parque das Nações at sunrise to learn how to use it. The light was warm and soft, and everything seemed worthwhile shooting, from flamingos to cats and from chairs to bridges. This image though, which involved some perilous wobbling at the edge of the water to get an overhead shot of the leaves, was my favourite for the day. Julesvernex2 (talk) 21:54, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support - Interesting play of colours between the browns of the leaves. I'm not a fan of the dirt, myself, but overall I feel like this image has a lot of power. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:54, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:38, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support per Aristeas's excellent explanation. The dirt helps give a sense of depth. The level of detail is fantastic, as evidenced by the clarity of the dead bugs (of which there are many). JayCubby (talk) 22:25, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 04:30, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Very good composition. Support per nom, Jay. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:32, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 08:54, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:14, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 14:13, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support I'll admit that I didn't read the rather lengthy description but the overall quality of this photo is the x-factor that brought me to this decision. Wolverine X-eye 16:13, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- That's perfectly fine, Wolverine – I admit that this time I didn’t know where to stop. ;–) It would only be bad the other way around, if we were to vote based on the nomination without looking at the photograph. It’s the picture that matters … – Aristeas (talk) 19:20, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:02, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 17:43, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Strong support per Aristeas's compelling impression. The colors really are beautiful. – Julian Lupyan (talk) 18:15, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Like it a lot, great colours and composition. BigDom (talk) 18:46, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support as per nomination. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:33, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 21:32, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:33, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:32, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:57, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 12:19, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 19:49, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:41, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:11, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Jan 2026 at 18:22:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues outdoors
Info created by Christian David – uploaded by Christian David – nominated by Christian David -- Espandero (talk) 18:22, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Espandero (talk) 18:22, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 04:31, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Very nice sculpture and lake panorama. The clouds are a little noisy, but nothing bad. It's slightly disturbing that the link to the camera location doesn't work: (Not found: The URL you have requested, https://geohack.toolforge.org/geohack.php?pagename=File:Jeunes_filles_jouant_sur_des_hippocampes_-_Fille_au_ballon.jpg¶ms=046.458985_N_0006.840003_E_globe:Earth_type:camera__&language=en, doesn't seem to actually exist.) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:36, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment Unfortunately many/most (all?) camera location links do not work right now (although the object location links work). Either there is a bug in the {{Location}} template resp. in some of the tools it relies on, or the geohack tool is partially broken. – Aristeas (talk) 09:30, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment Now the camera location links works again. Let’s hope the issue is fixed for good. – Aristeas (talk) 19:08, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment - For licensing purposes, please use Template:FoP-Switzerland for the underlying work. Information on the object itself (artist, year of installation) should also be included if available. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:25, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support and @ Chris Woodrich: For information about the artist, see my photo of the same object ;-) --Llez (talk) 11:09, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:48, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Very good environmental view of the statue; the framing, the clouds and the cool colours add a little touch of drama to the photo, very appropriate to this artwork. – Aristeas (talk) 19:08, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:22, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Thanks Llez for that bit of information; I've added it to the description. I also see that the tag is there now.
- Just to clarify my rationale.... To be some of the "best" on Commons, a work should reflect our policies as best as possible. For works that capture something with an underlying copyright (i.e., derivative works in countries that allow freedom of panorama), as per Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Uploading_images_covered_under_Freedom_of_Panorama_to_the_Commons that means acknowledging the FOP exception at the very least. Acknowledging the artist, where possible, is best practice, given their moral rights, our need for a detailed description, and the fact that some countries legally require it in FoP cases. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:00, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Jan 2026 at 17:51:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class : Anthozoa
Info Bubble coral (Plerogyra sinuosa), Anilao, Philippines. The "bubbles", of up to 2.5 cm (1 in) in diameter, are grape-sized which increase their surface area according to the amount of light available: they are larger during the day, but smaller during the night, when tentacles reach out to capture food. This species requires low light and a gentle water flow. It ranges from the Red Sea and Madagascar in the western Indian Ocean to Okinawa and the Line Islands in the Pacific. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 17:51, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 17:51, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support: fascinating fauna. I think the image is a bit too blue, though. Other photos show the coral as closer to cream-white. JayCubby (talk) 18:38, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 19:06, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 19:39, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:33, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:13, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 02:53, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 04:32, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice, detailed photo of an interesting creature I never knew existed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:38, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:38, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose The WB needs to be fixed. —kallerna (talk) 17:35, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- I uploaded a new version, —kallerna, happy now? FYI, too JayCubby. Poco a poco (talk) 21:29, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- Yes, thank you! JayCubby (talk) 21:46, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- I uploaded a new version, —kallerna, happy now? FYI, too JayCubby. Poco a poco (talk) 21:29, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 17:45, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:49, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:33, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Great capture of a species I didn't know about before; thank you very much for the improved white balance! -- Radomianin (talk) 09:04, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:55, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 12:16, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 02:46, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Jan 2026 at 13:54:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Japan
Info Wide view of Mount Fuji at sunset. 108 sec exposure. Created by Romain Guy, uploaded/nominated by me Юрий Д.К. 13:54, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 13:54, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Well done, but also very nice. --Harlock81 (talk) 14:40, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 16:41, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support per Harlock81. I wish there was a wee bit more space on the right, though. JayCubby (talk) 18:40, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:13, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 02:55, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 04:31, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support per Harlock81. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:40, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:37, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:28, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:23, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:00, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Weak support The CA should have been removed better. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ermell (talk • contribs) 17:48, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 21:33, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 07:28, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:54, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 12:15, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Weak support per Ermell. – Aristeas (talk) 19:05, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Wonderful. --Laitche (talk) 21:33, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:45, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support even though it'd look better with shorter exposure. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:59, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Jan 2026 at 21:45:21 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Procyonidae (Raccoons and Allies)
Info White-nosed coati at the beach in Yucatán. Created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 21:45, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Zquid (talk) 21:45, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice work, Giles. Good handling of the presumably harsh light. The level of detail is incredible. Is the eye reflection of a building? JayCubby (talk) 22:00, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
- Not 100% sure on the eye reflection but it's possibly a building yes. There was a bunch of wild coatis in a touristic area and they were stealing food from trash cans and begging tourists for food. Unfortunately there were also some tourists giving food to them. I took picture of the coatis because the background with the sea was beautiful but I'm against feeding wild animals like these tourists did... Giles Laurent (talk) 22:37, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Thank you for the nomination! -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:34, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 01:12, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 03:05, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 03:29, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support VitorFriboquen :] (Talk) 04:03, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:12, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Pretty animal and excellent picture, as usual. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:57, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:15, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 08:34, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:04, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:40, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Amazing colors – Julian Lupyan (talk) 16:42, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 19:06, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Goodness me! Wolverine X-eye 20:21, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support-- Ahad.F (talk) 21:26, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:37, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:29, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support - Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 15:19, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:22, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:59, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:51, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --BigDom (talk) 18:54, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support as per Ikan. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:52, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:34, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 08:39, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:52, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 19:02, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Jan 2026 at 20:28:00 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Primates#Genus : Macaca (Macaques)
Info A hybrid between a common species and the langur which is Critically Endangered. All by Charlesjsharp-- Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:28, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:28, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support JayCubby (talk) 21:21, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 01:11, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 03:28, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Beautiful. How far away were you from this thoughtful-looking monkey? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:59, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
- Just a couple of metres I guess, as I didn't use full zoom. Uncropped and focus-stacked from 5 images. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:32, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:16, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:05, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 02:56, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:36, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Harsh light, awkward background. —kallerna (talk) 17:39, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 22:01, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 03:41, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:18, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Jan 2026 at 19:24:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#France
Info created by JackyM59 – uploaded by JackyM59 – nominated by JackyM59 -- JackyM59 (talk) 19:24, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- JackyM59 (talk) 19:24, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Good compo; half cut trees on sides throw your eyes straight to the castle. Also good colors and sharp. --Mile (talk) 20:43, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 03:28, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Good photo of this fanciful castle. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:03, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:41, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:05, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 17:38, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:11, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 02:58, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:36, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Good perspective and quality, effective light, and the natural framing makes it special. – Aristeas (talk) 11:14, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:31, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice framing Poco a poco (talk) 15:22, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:59, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:51, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --BigDom (talk) 18:54, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support as per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:47, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 21:58, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:51, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 12:09, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Jan 2026 at 16:10:29 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Doors
Info Carved doors Said Mahruyjan Complex (двери Мавзолей Саид Мухаммад Махирий), Khiva, Uzbekistan. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 16:10, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Mile (talk) 16:10, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 16:13, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 16:42, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 17:23, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support I like the contrast of ornate, traditional woodwork and the austere lock. JayCubby (talk) 18:52, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 19:06, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:42, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support per Jay – Julian Lupyan (talk) 16:42, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:36, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:34, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 21:55, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:34, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:50, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support per Jay. – Aristeas (talk) 19:01, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Jan 2026 at 15:30:19 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Switzerland#Valais
Info Sphinx Observatory (3,571 m / 11,716 ft), Jungfraujoch, Switzerland – created and uploaded by Roy Egloff – nominated by Augustgeyler -- August (talk) 15:30, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- August (talk) 15:30, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice compo Poco a poco (talk) 15:43, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:52, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Сombo of colors is good. --Mile (talk) 16:12, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 16:17, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:00, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support but with a
Request for Roy: Could you please reduce the JPEG artifacts? They are rather prominent around the wires. JayCubby (talk) 17:09, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support as per Poco and Jay. -- Radomianin (talk) 17:12, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 17:23, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:13, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 19:05, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Awesome sight! Wolverine X-eye 21:10, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:11, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 01:05, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:43, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment As AI-based upscaling is currently under discussion at AI-based processing, I personally do not consider AI-based upscaling acceptable for FP. If this image was produced using multi-image stitching, I would be happy to support it; however, the file description does not specify the processing method. --Laitche (talk) 13:28, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:35, 7 January 2026 (UTC)--Laitche (talk) 11:21, 7 January 2026 (UTC) P.S. By repeatedly applying AI-based upscaling to this image as the source, it would even be possible to reach 30,000 × 20,000 px. At that point, it would effectively be an AI-generated image itself. The only way to prevent that is to say ‘no’ at the very first instance of AI-based upscaling. --Laitche (talk) 11:32, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose If it turns out that this photo is a multi-stitch panorama, I will switch this {{O}} to {{S}}. For now, I am provisionally judging it as AI-based upscaling. In that case, it has been enlarged by AI from 20 MP to 39.3 MP. Since accepting AI-based upscaling by an area factor of about 1.97 is difficult for me.- This image is a crop of a multi-stitch panorama. Roy Egloff (talk) 22:02, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- Very good. Could you please add this statement to the image (for example by using the panorama template)? August (talk) 22:04, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Roy Egloff: Thanks, so I change to
Support --Laitche (talk) 22:57, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- This image is a crop of a multi-stitch panorama. Roy Egloff (talk) 22:02, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment We know this author and his high resolution imagees for a long time now. He is providing high resolution images here for many years now, most of them created long before AI-based upascaling was even possible. --August (talk) 11:45, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- The author has stated that AI-based upscaling was used for this image. The original image was taken on April 1, 2007. The nominated image was taken on April 20, 2021, but the upload date is March 27, 2024, and I am also concerned that the author has emptied their user page. --Laitche (talk) 12:16, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- OK, that's a thing. So what do you think about this large image: CH.ZH.Zurich Hotel The-Dolder-Grand 3x2-R 15K.jpg? It was taken in 2021 and uploaded in 2023. It became FP in 2023 as well. It was taken with a 21 Megapixel camera. But the published image has 157 Megapixels. There is no template about stitching. But the second edit indicates the clearing of a stitching error. So I assume it was well combined out of many images. That was the reason why I still think his images are good examples of well stitched compositions. Therefore I still believe this nomination is legit. It looks like a great stitching example shot on the same camera.
- But the newest developments including the deletion of his user page are raising my concerns. August (talk) 21:59, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you for the information. This issue has been resolved, but these days we are seeing various issues surrounding AI. In particular, for photos that may be confusing, it would be advisable to note in the file description whether the stitching was done manually or using AI-based tools. --Laitche (talk) 23:26, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- I deleted my user page because it was outdated and overloaded with way too much boring stuff. Since time is limited, the user page had to go. I’ll replace it someday with a simpler, maintenance-free version. Roy Egloff (talk) 23:28, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment @Laitche anycase you could make Template: Donwsized, Upsized, AI Upsized etc. No joke. Where will cams set, what MPx will be ideal ? You know, i am sure we passed some AI, strong edited photos here. Who can cover 30 shots just like that, needs time. Wont be long, wont be long... --Mile (talk) 11:47, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Mile I’ve added a provisional approach (my personal proposal) as a comment at the end of the AI-based processing section here, so please refer to that. --Laitche (talk) 12:42, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- The author has stated that AI-based upscaling was used for this image. The original image was taken on April 1, 2007. The nominated image was taken on April 20, 2021, but the upload date is March 27, 2024, and I am also concerned that the author has emptied their user page. --Laitche (talk) 12:16, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support - While I see and understand Laitche's concerns, elements of the image lead me to believe this was likely not AI upscaled. Resizing the image to 20 MP, the mesh on the right-side peak is invisible and the mesh on the net is undefined. On the 40 MP image, there is clear detail on both, which I don't think would be inferred by AI based on the 20 MP version. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:47, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- I think it must have been created by stitching many images into one. Do you see any evidence for or against this theory? August (talk) 22:01, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --BigDom (talk) 18:55, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Excellent. Roy has explained that this is ‘a crop of a multi-stitch panorama’, see above. – Aristeas (talk) 19:00, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:16, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Jan 2026 at 14:05:28 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info An FP of this species was promoted in October. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:05, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:05, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Great feather detail, good choice of 'horizon', good-looking bird. JayCubby (talk) 15:07, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:43, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:52, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support You could cut few pixles above. --Mile (talk) 16:15, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 16:17, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 17:24, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:15, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 18:49, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 19:07, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:10, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 01:04, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 03:05, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:13, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:43, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:42, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:35, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --BigDom (talk) 18:55, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 21:52, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 08:39, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:48, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 18:59, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Jan 2026 at 08:32:15 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Geraniaceae
Info created, uploaded, nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:32, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:32, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Beautiful flower. What is the background? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:28, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks. The background is a fabric textured paper painted with matt acrylic paint. The flowers are illuminated by the sunlight from my window. -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:52, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 09:59, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:12, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 10:48, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mile (talk) 16:13, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 19:06, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 01:14, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:34, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:51, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:38, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, I fail to see anything special here. —kallerna (talk) 17:45, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 18:59, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Jan 2026 at 07:37:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Cuculidae_(Cuckoos)
Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 07:37, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 07:37, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:36, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 10:48, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 19:07, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 03:05, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:11, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Not as sharp as some bird photos but still quite detailed, you got him while he was singing, and the composition is good. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:44, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:34, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support per Ikan. – Aristeas (talk) 11:12, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:37, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 21:50, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 08:39, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:46, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Jan 2026 at 05:22:07 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Others
Info Oak leaf gall apple an oak leaf at the bottom. Focus stack of 12 photos. found on December 16th on the underside of an oak leaf.
all by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:22, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:22, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Well done. The hole on the right suggests it is old, or that something happened to the larva inside; interesting and educational. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:11, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:36, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:30, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 09:58, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 11:49, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 16:53, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 19:08, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 00:23, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 16:44, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Pretty nature colours, and the soft light has a nice glow which adds a tiny touch of magic. – Aristeas (talk) 16:58, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:11, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:33, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --BigDom (talk) 18:55, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 21:49, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jan 2026 at 14:27:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo_techniques/Styles_and_Techniques#Minimalism
Info Flowers of Prunus mume at Nagai Park. c/u/n by Laitche (talk) 14:27, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Laitche (talk) 14:27, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Balanced composition, with natural light emphasizing form and structure. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:27, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 20:19, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 21:34 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 23:55, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:37, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Pretty subject and composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:32, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 09:58, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:13, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 19:07, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 03:06, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:13, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:19, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 16:44, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Very beautiful composition which emphasizes the delicate beauty of the flowers and the natural elegance of the twig. – Aristeas (talk) 16:53, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:10, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:33, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:35, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 08:40, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jan 2026 at 11:34:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Composites and Montages#Montages (Multiple images shown side-by-side)
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 11:34, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 11:34, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support A carefully structured, high-resolution collage that brings together colour, form and surface into a coherent whole. The individual doors remain distinct, yet together they create a strong visual rhythm and a compelling documentation of this art project in Funchal. -- Radomianin (talk) 11:54, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support per Radomianin – Julian Lupyan (talk) 15:42, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support and it is great that FoP allows this on Commons. Yann (talk) 16:17, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 16:18, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support per anderen.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:48, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Awesome, thank you for painstakingly documenting this Madeiran project! --Julesvernex2 (talk) 17:39, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Fantastically done composite. JayCubby (talk) 18:08, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 19:56, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Wow!! Wolverine X-eye 20:01, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support per Yann. --Terragio67 (talk) 21:31, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:35, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 00:08, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Info This was a downsampled version, because I did not found any possibility to upload the full resolution. I just found a way! Now this file has the full resolution! I'm happy. -- XRay 💬 07:34, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
- Awesome! JayCubby (talk) 12:58, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:47, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:37, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 08:58, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 10:48, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:44, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support, but it's interesting that this is within the rules as a montage but would not be accepted as a set of individual photos of some painted (etc.) doors. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:52, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
- I thought about it for a while. Since I've been interested in photo series lately, I looked for a way to put together a suitable collection of images. This collection is part of a creative process. Unlike a set, only certain doors are possible here so that the format is consistent. -- XRay 💬 18:07, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 19:08, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 21:56, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Strong support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 16:50, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:10, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:32, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support - But please also include Template:FoP-Portugal, given the plethora of underlying copyrights. Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Portugal also indicates that the names of artists shall be provided where possible. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:03, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Done It's done. However, my bot would have done that in the next few days anyway. Due to a small configuration error, the template was forgotten. I fixed the error a few days ago. The template will also be added to the source files. Incidentally, all artists known to me are named in the source files. Unfortunately, the project website is not entirely up to date and there are no descriptive labels. What was possible has been done. Incidentally, this is my standard practice: if I can find out who the creator is, I name them. I think that's fair. -- XRay 💬 21:29, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks! Good to know about the bot; I appreciate you being diligent in recording FoP considerations... it makes navigating the licenses a lot easier. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:08, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 21:47, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:32, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jan 2026 at 11:29:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Portugal
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 11:29, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 11:29, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Overprocessed image of easy subject. —kallerna (talk) 07:08, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment I like it, but I'd like to hear from you on how it is overprocessed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:54, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 10:47, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 19:08, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:35, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:32, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 21:46, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support I'm still waiting to hear how it's overprocessed, but it's an exciting composition to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:55, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:14, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 13:03, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Jan 2026 at 16:54:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Palaces#Germany
Info Fountain at Seehof Castle in Memmelsdorf near Bamberg, orthophoto. Distance to the ground approx. 100 m. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 16:54, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Ermell (talk) 16:54, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Support At first, I was struck by the brightness of the sun on the water. Very good, and an interesting view. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:19, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 08:40, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 10:22, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 11:21, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:47, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Harsh light & shadows. —kallerna (talk) 17:52, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:31, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:37, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Weak support per Kallerna. --heylenny (talk/edits) 19:10, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Too tight crop at the sides. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:35, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Weak support With this subject (in Germany I would call it ein grafisches Motiv) the high contrast works very well, so IMHO the light and shadows are fine. But I have to agree that the photo would gain by a slightly wider crop at the left and right. @Ermell: Any chance for some extra pixels at the left and right? – Aristeas (talk) 16:43, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you for your vote. Since the cascades only run on the hour, the ideal time is actually between 2 pm and 3 pm. Here at 3 pm, the shadows of the tall trees unfortunately get in the way when you look straight down from above. I've tried several options, but unfortunately haven't found a way to get the entire fountain in the picture yet. Ermell (talk) 09:06, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- I understand this is not an easy shot. – Aristeas (talk) 09:45, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you for your vote. Since the cascades only run on the hour, the ideal time is actually between 2 pm and 3 pm. Here at 3 pm, the shadows of the tall trees unfortunately get in the way when you look straight down from above. I've tried several options, but unfortunately haven't found a way to get the entire fountain in the picture yet. Ermell (talk) 09:06, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:31, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose - Agree with Sebring; the sides need breathing room. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:15, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose crop. --BigDom (talk) 18:50, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jan 2026 at 21:38:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Doors
Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:38, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:38, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
*{{o}} It might be QI because the sharpness is good, but I'm not sure because the detail isn't good enough. I think it's below what you'd expect from an FP image. Why wov? --Lmbuga (talk) 22:55, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- I’m unsure why do you think the detail isn’t good enough when the ornaments are clearly visible at full size (even the curves around the greened areas of the copper can be carefully observed). As for the wow factor, this is an unusual example of an Eastern Orthodox Church door with neo-Baroque decoration, and the motif is missing from the FP category. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 05:32, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
- I'm sorry. I may be mistaken. Now I have a better impression: I withdraw my vote--Lmbuga (talk) 15:52, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 07:46, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 11:22, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Striking in its simplicity, the image captures light, texture, and form with quiet honesty; there is a slight blur towards the top, likely from perspective correction, but it is minimal and does not detract from the overall quality. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:04, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:18, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 21:38, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, nothing special IMO. —kallerna (talk) 07:10, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:29, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 10:48, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per Kallerna, though it looks like we'll be outvoted, and that's OK. It's possible I might find a photo of this door special in warmer light, but maybe not. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:20, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 19:12, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 16:24, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose A nice door but I would also like to see better light for FP. --BigDom (talk) 18:52, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jan 2026 at 19:25:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Poland
Info created by Mike Peel – uploaded by Mike Peel – nominated by Mike Peel -- Mike Peel (talk) 19:25, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Mike Peel (talk) 19:25, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment As a first impression, I don't like the gray on gray, and I'm likely to oppose for that reason. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:22, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment FPs in the Gallery Astronomy all show stars and other views of the skies. The Gallery for this image should be Buildings. --Tagooty (talk) 08:37, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Calm composition and very good quality. I've fixed gallery link Юрий Д.К. 10:27, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:19, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 16:16, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Dull light, no wow. —kallerna (talk) 17:48, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Nothing wrong with this image, but still missing something special here that would make it extraordinary Poco a poco (talk) 15:49, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per my comments and others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:56, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jan 2026 at 16:25:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/1900s#1940-1949
Info created by Russell Lee, restored by Adam Cuerden, uploaded and nominated by Yann
Support I cropped the left and right sides. I think it makes a much better composition. -- Yann (talk) 16:25, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Question At Wikipedia FPC, there was a comment:- 'it's an image taken by a renowned photographer, imposing our own crop on it may be antithetical to our values'. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:06, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- The framing at the time of shooting is rarely the same as that of the final print. Whether the photographer is renowned or not doesn't change it. Yann (talk) 19:47, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose anyway. You've cropped out part of a building that is labeled on the photo you've extracted this from. I'd rather support Adam's photo. Consider offering it as an alt. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:29, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
- OK, please see below. Yann (talk) 08:40, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Very high quality even for such old photo and nice composition Юрий Д.К. 06:49, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 11:27, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 20:14, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Yann's crop is good (as is Adam's restoration), though I'd be curious how prints of this were cropped. JayCubby (talk) 23:09, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:05, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I don't see anything special here. —kallerna (talk) 17:46, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice vanishing point. --heylenny (talk/edits) 19:15, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Alternative
Support, and thanks for offering this as an alt. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:52, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Also supporting this one. --heylenny (talk/edits) 19:15, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support I prefer this. Adam Cuerden (talk) 22:54, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:17, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Jan 2026 at 13:37:56 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Germany
Info created by New York-air – uploaded by New York-air – nominated by New York-air -- New York-air (talk) 13:37, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- New York-air (talk) 13:37, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Beautiful fireworks! Юрий Д.К. 16:29, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 17:05, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Super, dass Du dabei warst ;) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 17:11, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:27, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment Original is better, crop to tight here. --Mile (talk) 17:48, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:49, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support I like this better than the original. :-) Zquid (talk) 22:40, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 11:25, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Average image of fireworks, nothing featurable imo, sorry. —kallerna (talk) 17:50, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support I think this is about as good as the original. I wouldn't have cropped so much, though: the sweet spot to me would have been to leave everything originally on the right and crop slightly on the left. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:46, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:55, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 04:38, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Neutral Very nice, but like others the crop (esp. at the top) irritates me. IMHO the crop suggested by Ikan would be perfect. – Aristeas (talk) 16:10, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Neutral as per Aristeas and Mile. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:52, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Jan 2026 at 03:54:34 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/People#Others.
Info created by Lmbuga – uploaded by Lmbuga – nominated by Lmbuga -- Lmbuga (talk) 03:54, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Info Taken in 2014. "Childrens in danger, and granite rocks on the beach of San Vicente do Mar, O Grove, Galicia, Spain".
Comment The picture was downscaled so that the standing child could not be recognized. --Lmbuga (talk) 04:43, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- I think that's unsuccessful. I believe he is very recognizable. It would probably work better to revert the downscaling and blur his face. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:03, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Lmbuga (talk) 03:54, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -Petro Stelte (talk) 10:52, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 16:48, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:27, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:03, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Missing value & the description is nothing meaningful —kallerna (talk) 17:56, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I agree, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 15:54, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 04:37, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Weak support Юрий Д.К. 17:52, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Jan 2026 at 21:26:57 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Greece
Info created by Petro Stelte – uploaded by Petro Stelte – nominated by Petro Stelte -- Petro Stelte (talk) 21:26, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support I wish you all a happy new year. -- Petro Stelte (talk) 21:26, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment Some CA visible. JayCubby (talk) 21:32, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
- How far did you zoom in to see that? Petro Stelte (talk) 21:39, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
- 1:1 JayCubby (talk) 00:41, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- JayCubby I tried removing the CA. Would that be better? [1] Petro Stelte (talk) 16:33, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
- 1:1 JayCubby (talk) 00:41, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- How far did you zoom in to see that? Petro Stelte (talk) 21:39, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support It seems good to me, but at 1:1, I've seen more obvious minor CAs right at the end of the handrails (In the lower area of the angled handrails). --Lmbuga (talk) 04:26, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Lmbuga I tried removing the CA. Would that be better? [2] Petro Stelte (talk) 17:11, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
- Much better, thanks--Lmbuga (talk) 19:43, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, I fail to see anything special here, no wow. —kallerna (talk) 09:03, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 09:12, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:15, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:09, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support I find the scene interesting – Julian Lupyan (talk) 16:48, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:59, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support I love these Greek rock chapels, and the photo shows the dared location of that sanctuary very impressively. – Aristeas (talk) 17:35, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support as per Julian and Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:25, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Remembers this chapel on Fuerteventura --Llez (talk) 11:01, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- That's a very nice photo. Petro Stelte (talk) 15:25, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- Yes, it's a beautiful photo, but it's much more difficult to take than it looks. It's quite an achievement.--Lmbuga (talk) 00:02, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
- That's a very nice photo. Petro Stelte (talk) 15:25, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Info I have uploaded a new version in which I have removed the CA. I hope you all agree. --Petro Stelte (talk) 19:17, 3 January 2026 (UTC) --
- Much better. Thanks --Lmbuga (talk) 19:48, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:58, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Nothing wrong with the compo but I fail to see sometzhing special here. The subject seems to be very modern so it isn't probably of big historic value, either. Poco a poco (talk) 15:57, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
I was worried about you.Here is the story about the church. [3] Simply translate it in your browser.. Petro Stelte (talk) 16:07, 5 January 2026 (UTC)- I'm not seeing anything that says how old the traditions relating to the church or the church itself are. And are you truly worried about Poco or engaging in the type of ad hominem comment we need not to engage in on this board? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:02, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
- I apologize. This is also my last post here on FPC. Petro Stelte (talk) 18:09, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
- That seems like an overreaction. No-one is suggesting for you not to post here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:32, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Petro Stelte: Reconsider it, please (I know those feelings, and I can only tell you that they are rarely justified. Even if justified or partially justified in some cases, there are many of us who are there: Problems are as important as you make them).--Lmbuga (talk) 01:27, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
- I would like to second the plea to reconsider your retreat. I understand your feelings, but I am sure neither Poco’s nor Ikan’s comment was meant as an attack or personal reproach to you, especially not as an attempt to exclude you from FPC. – Aristeas (talk) 16:07, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
- That seems like an overreaction. No-one is suggesting for you not to post here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:32, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
- I apologize. This is also my last post here on FPC. Petro Stelte (talk) 18:09, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
- I'm not seeing anything that says how old the traditions relating to the church or the church itself are. And are you truly worried about Poco or engaging in the type of ad hominem comment we need not to engage in on this board? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:02, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
- I would like to add my voice to the recent comments. A retreat really isn't necessary here - FPC thrives on exchange, on differing viewpoints, and sometimes on friction or misunderstandings that can be resolved through discussion. It is precisely this diversity that sustains FPC: different photographic approaches, individual visual languages, and new perspectives on subjects that may seem familiar at first glance. We need new reviewers, photographers, and nominators who are willing to no longer hide their photographic sensitivity, but instead bring it into the Wiki projects and share their own way of seeing the world. Every sincere contribution enriches the project - even, and perhaps especially, when opinions differ. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 18:28, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
- Differences of opinion are great; ad hominem remarks are not, and I won't beg someone who's sore about being called on them to stay here. I hope they stay and contribute their photos and opinions on photography, but I don't appreciate this drama. Stay or don't, but don't attack people ad hominem. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:50, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek What drama are you talking about? I only said that this is my last post here so everyone knows they shouldn't expect any further replies from me. You and your constant "ad hominem" are the reason for my decision, not Poco's vote. I can't help it that you take every word so literally. Just to be clear. Petro Stelte (talk) 06:49, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- The drama of you posting that and people begging you to stay. And no further comment from me about this. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:55, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- That's exactly what I mean. Petro Stelte (talk) 06:59, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- The drama of you posting that and people begging you to stay. And no further comment from me about this. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:55, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek What drama are you talking about? I only said that this is my last post here so everyone knows they shouldn't expect any further replies from me. You and your constant "ad hominem" are the reason for my decision, not Poco's vote. I can't help it that you take every word so literally. Just to be clear. Petro Stelte (talk) 06:49, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- Differences of opinion are great; ad hominem remarks are not, and I won't beg someone who's sore about being called on them to stay here. I hope they stay and contribute their photos and opinions on photography, but I don't appreciate this drama. Stay or don't, but don't attack people ad hominem. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:50, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Petro Stelte: Some of the tension here seems to come from different readings of tone and wording, which is easy to happen in written exchanges. At that point, discussions often drift away from the image itself. For me, it is important that FPC discussions stay on the level of the subject. Personal attributions or ad hominem readings - whether intended or not - don't help the photographic evaluation and tend to create unnecessary friction. Support and opposition stand on their own. Different viewpoints are part of what keeps FPC alive, and I hope we can let the personal aspect rest and return to the photograph. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 08:30, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- I would like to add my voice to the recent comments. A retreat really isn't necessary here - FPC thrives on exchange, on differing viewpoints, and sometimes on friction or misunderstandings that can be resolved through discussion. It is precisely this diversity that sustains FPC: different photographic approaches, individual visual languages, and new perspectives on subjects that may seem familiar at first glance. We need new reviewers, photographers, and nominators who are willing to no longer hide their photographic sensitivity, but instead bring it into the Wiki projects and share their own way of seeing the world. Every sincere contribution enriches the project - even, and perhaps especially, when opinions differ. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 18:28, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 04:39, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Jan 2026 at 20:50:32 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Abstract
Info Light through a window and venetian blinds, making shadows. Posted on Flickr by author Sheila Sund. Created by Sheila Sund – uploaded from Flickr by Jon Kolbert – nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 20:50, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment First I placed this photo under "Photo techniques/Black and White#Objects"... but I think "Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Abstract" is a better choice. What do you think? Zquid (talk) 20:50, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Zquid (talk) 20:50, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Low quality for such an easy shot, overprocessed —kallerna (talk) 09:04, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 09:12, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:08, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice find! Very interesting abstract(ish) composition. Both the limited DoF and B&W harmonize with that subject and help to emphasize its abstract beauty. B&W images often work well with more contrast and sharpening than colour photos, IMHO the processing is appropriate. – Aristeas (talk) 17:32, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Convincing use of light geometry. The interplay of window light and blinds creates a balanced, almost architectural abstraction. Black and white strengthens structure and visual tension. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:23, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:35, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Paracel63 (talk) 20:10, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose 1- The area in focus is the central upper part, and it's full of hot pixels, in my opinion (evaluate after reading point 4). 2- The picture is oversharpened, IMO. 3- Wov?, why?, beacuse it's rare. 4- The picture seems downscalled: 2,048 × 2,048 pixels and Canon EOS 5D Mark III, not with 4 like the picture, with 22,3 megapixels. --Lmbuga (talk) 01:10, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose per others. Interesting, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:19, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:22, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I concur with Lmbuga Poco a poco (talk) 15:58, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Weak support Nice photo, but it's small... --heylenny (talk/edits) 04:41, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Flickr become bad, now you can download just downsized shots, even your own. If not paying. That so. Sometime ago they jumped to 200-300 photos. Photo, could be repeating pattern, but not so convincing in this compo. --Mile (talk) 11:37, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Jan 2026 at 17:35:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues outdoors
Info Created, uploaded, and nominated by Julian Lupyan – Julian Lupyan (talk) 17:35, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Info I found the difference in lighting between the statue and the background interesting, as the subject is in almost cold shadow, while the background is brightly sunlit. As I have been disclaiming, this was taken with my former camera so there is a slight lack of detail, and I'm hoping that the local sharpening, the scene, and some of the textures I found appealing can compensate. – Julian Lupyan (talk) 17:35, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 17:35, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support per nom. JayCubby (talk) 21:15, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 04:40, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Statue is is shade and OOF. I fail to see the speciality in this composition. —kallerna (talk) 09:06, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 09:11, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support It seems someone didn't have a good start to the new year. --Petro Stelte (talk) 10:49, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- It seems like someone is making ad hominem remarks. Stick to criticizing the picture. As for me, I find the photo interesting, but I don't know whether it should be considered an FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:22, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:14, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:58, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:57, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Often the main subject of a photo is bright and the background is darker, but of course it also works the other way around, like here – the statue nicely stands out against the architecture, also because the sculpture appears a bit more bluish that the dark areas of the background. – Aristeas (talk) 17:27, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Agree with Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:40, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Per kallerna, the subject innshadow in the front with the lit columns in the back doesn't work for mw Poco a poco (talk) 22:43, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support You could easily go 2 stops down, with ISO, rellay no need for pushing and i doubt it was from camera. However 1st its was strange, i would do opposite shadow/light, but after day-two i accept this kind too, more due to colors. --Mile (talk) 16:36, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
- I agree, I must have made a mistake when adjusting my settings after exiting the cathedral – Julian Lupyan (talk) 21:08, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 04:43, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support I ultimately agree that this photo should be featured, because the contrast in light and color and the angle of the shot gives the statue of St. Paul rhetorical power. It's an interesting, thoughtful photo, not run of the mill. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:37, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jan 2026 at 10:10:18 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Boats
Info created by Kingshuk Mondal – uploaded by Kingshuk Mondal – nominated by Herpking -- Kingshuk Mondal (talk) 10:10, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Kingshuk Mondal (talk) 10:10, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Not sharp, and the sky is grainy. --heylenny (talk/edits) 15:14, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Paracel63 (talk) 20:23, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per Heylenny, and it probably shouldn't be a QI, either. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:23, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jan 2026 at 06:41:57 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Nectariniidae (Sunbirds_and_Spiderhunters)
Info No FP of Cinnyris hellmayri. created by Saudi Press Agency – uploaded by Ahad.F – nominated by Ahad.F -- Ahad.F (talk) 06:41, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Ahad.F (talk) 06:41, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment Had you noticed this photo? Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:31, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, I did. Ahad.F (talk) 15:06, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Charlesjsharp and Ahad.F: This one should be nominated too, IMO. heylenny (talk/edits) 16:15, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
- I agree, another beautiful image of this bird. Ahad.F (talk) 16:23, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 15:12, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Needs much tighter crop. —kallerna (talk) 09:07, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Kallerna A new version with a tighter crop has been uploaded. Thank you Ahad.F (talk) 15:39, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks! It is better, but the bird still forms only maybe 5% of the image area. —kallerna (talk) 19:24, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- I see. I avoided cropping further to prevent loss of image quality, but I can upload a more tightly cropped version if needed. Ahad.F (talk) 01:47, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks! It is better, but the bird still forms only maybe 5% of the image area. —kallerna (talk) 19:24, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 09:11, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:17, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Agree with kallerna Poco a poco (talk) 18:05, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you for your feedback, @Poco a poco and Kallerna: I uploaded a more tightly cropped version! Ahad.F (talk) 22:48, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:06, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Not sharp enough, IMO, especially considering how much sharper Hobbyfotowiki's photo is. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:28, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
- I agree, the crop is better but the detail remains the same. You needed more mm. Btw, it would be good to see that kind of information in the EXIF or in the desc. Poco a poco (talk) 16:02, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
- What do you mean by mm? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:03, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
- I agree, the crop is better but the detail remains the same. You needed more mm. Btw, it would be good to see that kind of information in the EXIF or in the desc. Poco a poco (talk) 16:02, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Sun 04 Jan → Fri 09 Jan Mon 05 Jan → Sat 10 Jan Tue 06 Jan → Sun 11 Jan Wed 07 Jan → Mon 12 Jan Thu 08 Jan → Tue 13 Jan Fri 09 Jan → Wed 14 Jan
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Wed 31 Dec → Fri 09 Jan Thu 01 Jan → Sat 10 Jan Fri 02 Jan → Sun 11 Jan Sat 03 Jan → Mon 12 Jan Sun 04 Jan → Tue 13 Jan Mon 05 Jan → Wed 14 Jan Tue 06 Jan → Thu 15 Jan Wed 07 Jan → Fri 16 Jan Thu 08 Jan → Sat 17 Jan Fri 09 Jan → Sun 18 Jan
Closing nominations manually
The following description explains how to close nominations manually. Normally this is not necessary, as FPCBot takes care of counting the votes, closing and archiving the nominations. When the Bot has counted the votes, a user needs to check and approve the result; everything else is done by the Bot. Therefore, the following instructions are normally only needed for delist-and-replace nominations that the Bot cannot (yet) process, and in case the Bot malfunctions. The closing can be done by any experienced user. If you need help, just ask on the FPC talk page.
Closing a featured picture nomination
- On Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the nomination, then [edit].
- Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=(“yes” or “no”)|gallery=xxx|sig=~~~~}}
(You can leave thegalleryparameter blank if the image was not featured. If the nomination contains alternatives, you must add thealternative=xxxparameter with the name of the selected image between thegalleryand thesigparameter. See {{FPC-results-reviewed}} for examples and more explanations.) - Edit the title of the nomination and add
featuredornot featuredafter the link – for example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Add the picture to the appropriate featured picture gallery page and section. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images on Commons:Featured pictures, list to find the gallery page, and search for the correct section. (An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.)
- Add the template
{{Assessments|featured=1}}to the image description page.- If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the
com-nomparameter. For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted in the nominationCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use{{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}You also need thecom-nomparameter if the image gets renamed. - If the image is already featured on another Wikipedia, just add
featured=1to the {{Assessments}} template. For instance,{{Assessments|enwiki=1}}becomes{{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the
- Head over to the structured data for the image and add the “Commons quality assessment” claim (P6731) “Wikimedia Commons featured picture” (Q63348049).
- Add the picture to the chronological archives of featured pictures. Place it at the end of the gallery using this format:
File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Title'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]<br> {{s|xxx}}, {{o|xxx}}, {{n|xxx}}- The
#should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other entries on that page for examples. (If you want to do everything perfectly, link that number to the nomination subpage, just like FPCBot does this. It allows users to jump directly to the nomination.) - The
Titleshould be replaced by the bare name of the featured picture, without the ‘File:’ or the file extension (such as .jpg .tif .svg). - The
xin{{s|x}}, {{o|x}}, {{n|x}}should be replaced by the count of support, oppose, and neutral votes respectively. - If the nomination was a set nomination, use this format:
File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Set: Title (Z files)'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]<br> {{s|x}}, {{o|x}}, {{n|x}}
Replace theZin(Z files)by the count of images in the set, and use the name of the first image from the set instead ofFile:xxxxx.jpgand for the title.
- The
- Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the nominator. For set nominations, use:== Set Promoted to FP ==, using the names of the set files instead of the XXXXXX and the title of the set instead of YYYYY.
<gallery>
File:XXXXXX.jpg
File:XXXXXX.jpg
</gallery>
{{FPpromotionSet2|YYYYY}} - Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedUploader|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the user who has uploaded the image, if that user is not the same as the nominator. - Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedCreator|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the creator, if the author is a different Commons user than nominator and uploader.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}-d, {{FPD}}-d and {{Withdraw}}-n nominations), you have to move the transclusion (the {{ }} and the text within those) of the nomination to the current log page.
- To find the current log page, visit the first page of the log for this month. If the header of that page contains a link with the text “Next part of this month”, the log for this month has been split into several parts because it contains too many entries. Click on the “Next part …” link and repeat this until you reach a page where the header does not offer a “Next part …” link; that’s the last and current log page.
- Now open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you are closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}or:{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/XXXXX}}. - Copy that line to the bottom of the current log page and save that page. Then remove the same line from the candidate list and save that page.
Closing a delisting nomination
- On Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):{{FPC-delist-results-reviewed|delist=x|keep=x|neutral=x|delisted=yes/no|sig=~~~~}}
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Ensifera ensifera (22271195865).jpg) - Edit the title of the delisting nomination and add
delistedornot delistedafter the image title; for example:=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Move the transclusion of the nomination to the current log page; please see above for an explanation how to find the current log page and how to move the nomination to it.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- In the {{Assessments}} template on the image description page, change
featured=1tofeatured=2(do not remove the {{Assessments}} template; do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes). If the image description page uses the old {{Featured picture}} template, replace it with{{Assessments|featured=2}}. - Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris); but not from categories about featured pictures on specific Wikipedia editions, like Category:Featured pictures on Wikipedia, English.
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" (Q63348049) from the picture's Structured data.
- In the {{Assessments}} template on the image description page, change
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in the chronological archive of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1–6) with (1–6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture must not be removed from the chronological archives.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the section above. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Archiving a withdrawn nomination
If a nomination has been withdrawn by the nominator by using {{Withdraw}} or is cancelled with {{FPX}} or {{FPD}}, wait 24 hours after the nomination was last edited. If there has been no objection to the cancellation within this time, the nomination can simply be archived. Just move the transclusion of the nomination to the current log page; please see above for an explanation how to find the current log page and how to move the nomination to it.
